Profile for Najosz Thjsza Kjras

Error message

Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /var/www/pied-piper.ermarian.net/includes/common.inc).

Recent posts

Pages

AuthorRecent posts
History in the making... in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #3
Can't it be edited out? That would solve for both problems, presumably.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
SW & DM2 Fusion! in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #8
What, so Slarty gets a berth and I don't? :P
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Starting Charcoal in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #2
I prefer a gas grill myself. Nice and efficient.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Help me!!! It's urgent!!! in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #11
XP is fairly complicated, but it actually seems to have a slimmer resource profile than I remember 2000 having; it's got less loose ends, less random resource problems, and is a LOT more stable.

I've gotten maybe a dozen system crashes since I installed XP a couple of years ago, whereas with 2K the dreaded blue screen of death was a daily occurrance.

I'd definitely update, even with a somewhat old computer - it's just hands-down a better OS.

It's a little expensive, though.

(And if you got a shortage on RAM - that stuff's like 5 dollars for a bajillion GB nowadays, isn't it?)
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Help me!!! It's urgent!!! in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #8
I'm not certain about NTFS being a feature as early as Win2K, but I'm certain it's probably not advisable to change formats - NTFS is more exclusive and has compatibility issues, whereas FAT has been market-standard forever and would not cause any problems were one to revert to an older version of Windows. (98 > 2000 stability-wise.)
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Help me!!! It's urgent!!! in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #6
No, this doesn't belong in Tech Support: it's in the right place where it is. (Tech Support is for specifically SW-related issues.)

You can format your hard drive by bringing up a DOS prompt and entering

FORMAT X:\*.*

Where X is the name of your drive.

Depending how Windows 2000 syntax works, you may have to type FORMAT X, FORMAT X:, or FORMAT X:\ instead. Don't worry - mis-syntaxing the parameter will do nothing nasty. (But make sure X is a drive you want deleted!)

If it says bad command or file name or something like that, navigate to your Windows directory first.

Back up ANYTHING important first, and make sure you have an install CD for your OS and any vital programs ready at hand. Expect to spend a few hours setting your computer up afterward.

If you don't know how to get to a DOS prompt, it should be reachable as follows:

START > ALL PROGRAMS > ACCESSORIES > COMMAND PROMPT

Windows 2000 may require that you first boot into DOS to format. To do that, go to START > SHUT DOWN, selecting 'Quit To DOS' or whatever equivalent item there is.

I strongly recommend you get a better OS in the future - Windows 2000 is terrible. XP is much more stable and user-friendly. In the meanwhile, I hope this helps!

[ Friday, July 21, 2006 17:30: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ]
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
I'm a Runescape freak how about you? in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #3
Runescape is retarded and if you play it you should be deeply ashamed of yourself.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Time for another, most embarassing moments thread. in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #66
Man, you boring English-diasporan bastards are all the same. Beat up peoples more interesting than you, drive them into marginal land, mock their grammar when the vague advantages you hold over them decay because you're too lazy to finish the job.

Sad.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Where are the Geneforgers? in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #6
It's past their bedtime.

Let them stay up any later and they get colicky.

[ Tuesday, July 18, 2006 08:38: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ]
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
V for Valkyr in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #9
First you claim to be a victim of combat-based post-traumatic stress, now you claim to be a drug addict.

Let me tell you what you are.

You're a child of fortune pantomiming the pain of society's most unfortunate victims. You are not only beneath pity, but beneath contempt; the only response you merit is nausea.

And I do not have another word to say to you.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Time for another, most embarassing moments thread. in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #33
How unusual we talking?
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Oh my God, you just can't make this **** up. in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #129
quote:
Originally written by Nepharim:

And some wonder why America is overweight.
I love you.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Oh my God, you just can't make this **** up. in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #126
quote:
Originally written by GremlinJoe:

That was the holy spirit.
Funny that the Holy Spirit just happens to be as much a dumb, unctuous jackass as you are.

[ Saturday, July 15, 2006 00:18: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ]
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Israel - Lebanon conflict in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #63
What I like is that the swarm of convenient Eurotrash have arrived in the topic and made it easy for the dumb vengeance-obsessed Zionists herein to pounce on them instead of addressing my contention that the Hz. militants are a God-damn tar baby. Vengenace, hell - this is exactly what they want.

Cheer the Israeli government on and you're cheering on the inevitable destruction of Israel.

Period.

Even ignoring the moral issues at stake here - a big even, but a necessary one - understand that this is a remarkable strategic blunder on the behalf of the Israeli government and will bring only ruin to Israel in the long term.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Israel - Lebanon conflict in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #47
quote:
Originally written by Sir David:

If the situation were in the hands of PM Olmert's detractors, Israel would sit back and whine to the rest of the world while allowing avowed racists and terrorists to destroy its people, its buildings and its morale one shell at a time. That is if it hadn't already been destroyed in the mid-20th century, which would be entirely likely. Call it what you want, but to defend Hezbollah, Ahmedinejad, Hamas or any of their ilk is to say that the Nazis weren't so bad after all, just they were too... well, legitimate. We're talking about people who have publicly stated their intention to finish the job Hitler started, and I hate Nazi analogies as much as the rest of you.

I'm in agreement with Alorael about Israel's actions. About those of Hezbollah... the thought that anyone could justify their actions makes me sick. No, Lebanon's civilians shouldn't be killed for the actions of a terrorist organization within their ranks. But what can you do when confronted by such people?

I direct you to my post at the top of the page. Olmert isn't taking a tough stance against terrorism; he's basically giving the terrorists what they want on a silver platter. They want Israel to swoop in and kill hundreds of civilians. They want nothing more and could no more efficiently achieve their ultimate objective: alienating Israel and destroying it by attrition.

The reason they get away with that is that you and people like you are too short-sighted to realize their actual objectives, and the like of Likud actually want to see them carried out.

quote:
Originally written by GremlinJoe:

Oh for crying out loud, Israel is perfectly correct in its course of action. The only mistake they've made was to let the world boss them around in the first place. What I mean to say is, I'm angry that everyone is always telling them how they're wrong when they aren't. How long were they pressured by the international community into making peace with terrorists?

To many years have been spent giving in to to Israel's enemies. You know what I say, one big war to get rid of all those troublemakers is the only reasonable course of action. And it boggles the mind that anyone would say Israel is the bad guy in all this. I'll bet that if Israel had attacked Iraq and deposed of Saddam the world would be twice as outraged as it is about America doing so even though they'd have even better reason.

Do you even know what a terrorist is? Has someone lead you to believe it's a genetic trait? You're a child, and a dumb one.

quote:
Cute.

However, your argument simply proves my point: considering that German response to a percieved provocation was murder of 6 million people, and America's responce to a "provocation" of 9/11 was "regime change" in two countries, including one that had nothing to do with the attack, Israeli responce of bombing a couple of bridges and offices of people who ordered the "provocations" looks like an example of perfect restraint. :)

Germany believed it was saving the world. Compared to that, surely 6 million people is small potatoes. :P

I'm simply arguing that 'provocation' and any other revenge-based foreign policy is inherently stupid and destructive. In this case, the world is watching Israel attack Lebanon - and BTW, as it holds the entire government responsible for the Hezbollah radicals, it's made no restrictions whatsoever on use of force in Lebanon - for the actions of a few radicals.

Oh, it's fine revenge. It's a fine response to a provocation. But it's a stupid, evil thing to do. The soldiers they started this mess will almost certainly die in captivity, and no matter what else they do the hundreds of innocents they kill in the process will lead to more and more direct hatred of Israel in Lebanon and the Arab world at large.

Hezbollah knows Israel "won't negotiate with terrorists". It's getting exactly what it wants. So's the Israeli right, allowed to reach inconcievable levels of racist savagery by foreign sympathizers. (Read any statement made by Likud or, better, hard-right parties in Israel - and consider the people in question transposed to, say, whites and blacks. That kind of nonsense got South Africa made into an international pariah, and yet millions of well-meaning and fairly liberal well-wishers consider it perfectly fine if done in the name of Israel.) They achieve their objectives at the direct cost of Israeli and Lebanese lives.

What I'm saying here is that this is yet another instance of the Israeli government dragging Israel over a cliff to chase after another keffiyeh-wearing snipe. It will end horribly, and egging the government on is the worst thing you could possibly do.

Restraint is necessary. The attacks will never end - but they will at least be far, far less frequent if a generation of Arabs has grown up without having cowered under Israeli fighter-bombers ranging for revenge.

It's truly hard to hate a brick wall - and you try getting someone to blow himself up without hate being involved sometime.

[ Friday, July 14, 2006 00:05: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ]
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Israel - Lebanon conflict in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #33
quote:
Originally written by GremlinJoe:

I said five yerars ago that Israel would be confronted by Iran, China, And Russia, Plus Gearga and syria.
Georgia.

For the record, China and Russia have fairly cold diplomatic relations, and so do China and Iran. Georgia is a non-entity and Syria has been officially at war for decades.

quote:
And no one believed me! Why? Well I'll tell you why. Apperently a person has to have an I.Q. of 200 to be listened to and all I hade was 180 oh boo hoo. Well, what I said was true and no one cares. How about that? I'm so irritated.
Somehow I doubt this is why nobody believes you. (Also, IQ is meaningless, but that's a different topic altogether.)

quote:
Actually they might not have believed me because I said I got it from the Bible. I can't remember. Its actually in Ezekial. And a few other places. Oh well.
Yes, this is exactly why they didn't believe you: because you honestly believe the writings of a man who has been dead for millennia critiquing the evils of his own society - not even laying claim to prophecy! - somehow project specific events in the future.

No, your account doesn't come from the Bible. None of the countries you mentioned existed in the time Ezekiel lived, even as concepts, nor are they mentioned anywhere even in the most vague way. Instead, it comes from the self-obsessed apocalypse-interpretation mill, a constant effort of evangelical Christianity's least productive theologians to prove that they inhabit the End Times and will be whisked to Heaven by Jesus before they die.

And again, for the record: Russia and Israel are on good terms, Syria and Israel are no more hostile than they were last year, China and Israel get along just fine, and Iran and Israel get along surprisingly well for a pair of nuclear states that hate each other to death. Unless you have a really permissive definition of 'confront', what you've got is a false prophecy there, bub.

(Also, you apparently failed to prophesy that, you know, Israel and Lebanon would go to war. A little glaring, that.)

--

quote:
Originally written by Zeviz:

How long would Germany ignore "provocations"
Ask the right person and they'll say "until 1935".

But, of course, the fact that the philosophy of revenge leaves one with odd bedfellows should be news to nobody.

[ Thursday, July 13, 2006 21:27: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ]
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Israel - Lebanon conflict in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #25
quote:
Originally written by Icky:

Civilians are dying because Israel is unable to not respond to an attack by what is, in a very real sense, Lebanon.
I dispute this. What exactly is it that prevents Israel from exercising any restraint? The exact incident that has provoked the current crisis is the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers (thank you for the dissembling there, Zeviz - appreciate it); the response has cost anywhere between 20 and 50 civilian lives.

Would it kill them to initiate military action in self-defense only when they're actually defending themselves? All this looks like to me is revenge, one in a long chain of reprisals between two opposing sides.

Ultimately, the goal of radical anti-Israeli organizations is not to destroy Israel themselves, because they don't have the numbers or the weaponry to manage that, even combined. Their goal is to turn public opinion in the Middle East so thoroughly against the people of Israel that there will be no end save the destruction of one or both.

Of course, the Israeli right is all too willing to dance with them - not out of stupidity, but because they too are astounding racists and playing the militants' game allows them to live in a world where it's arabs-versus-jews, kill-or-be-killed. They're as eager for a grotesque race-war as the militants, it's just that they think they can win, and wind up solving all their problems with genocide by self-defense.

Every time crap like this happens, the most dangerous men in Israel and the Arab world are essentially shaking hands and cordially agreeing to shoot up the place until their more sensible neighbors are forced to fight each other, and keep shooting up the place so bad that it becomes a fight to the death.

I have no sympathy with the government of Israel peddling the line that it's defending itself, any more than I do with the Hezbollah militants that gave them this stirling opportunity. They're cooperating towards an inhuman end, and in a just world they would be lined up and shot.

[ Thursday, July 13, 2006 19:38: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ]
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Israel - Lebanon conflict in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #23
quote:
Originally written by Zeviz:

quote:
Originally written by The Worst Man Ever:

I did not ask you why Israel is killing civilians; that much is obvious. I asked you why civilians are dying here.

What will the civilian deaths in Lebanon accomplish?

1. If you don't know a difference between a bridge and a home, I am not sure how we can continue this discussion.

2. If you do know the difference, the answer to your question is obvious: Hezbolla's attacks against Israeli houses are trying to kill as many civillians as possible. Israel's attacks against bridges and airport are trying to stop Hezbolla from moving supplies and reinforcements.

3. You still haven't answered my question: how would you respond to rockets falling on American border towns?

Once more, I do know the difference between a bridge and a house, and I did not ask why Israel is bombing Lebanon. However, I wish to set aside the moral king of the hill these things always degenerate into for a moment.

To answer your question, because you asked it first: I would not.

Now please answer mine. What are the innocent deaths accomplishing? Why are the civilians dying?

[ Thursday, July 13, 2006 19:08: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ]
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Israel - Lebanon conflict in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #17
I did not ask you why Israel is killing civilians; that much is obvious. I asked you why civilians are dying here.

What will the civilian deaths in Lebanon accomplish?
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Israel - Lebanon conflict in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #12
quote:
Originally written by Zeviz:

quote:
Originally written by The Worst Man Ever:

quote:
Originally written by Zeviz:

I am wondering how USA, Canada, or whatever country you are from, would react to rockets fired at its border towns and an attack against border guards. (I have hard time imagining US shrugging off a barrage of Katusha rockets launched at San Diego suburbs followed by an attack against border guards.)

An attack like the one Hezbolla launched would be considered a start of war if it was directed against any other country in the world.

You'd say the same thing if the Israeli response had been a nuclear attack on Beirut, Zeviz.

You'd say the same think if Hezbolla had nuked Tel-Aviv, Alec.

Now that we've gotten that out of the way, I'd like to hear the answer to my question: What would USA do in response to a rocket attack against San Diego suburbs followed by an attack against its border guards?

Did Lebanon attack Israel? Why are its citizens being killed?

EDIT: These are two separate questions, in case it's not obvious, and the second is more important.

[ Thursday, July 13, 2006 16:52: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ]
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Israel - Lebanon conflict in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #6
quote:
Originally written by Zeviz:

I am wondering how USA, Canada, or whatever country you are from, would react to rockets fired at its border towns and an attack against border guards. (I have hard time imagining US shrugging off a barrage of Katusha rockets launched at San Diego suburbs followed by an attack against border guards.)

An attack like the one Hezbolla launched would be considered a start of war if it was directed against any other country in the world.

You'd say the same thing if the Israeli response had been a nuclear attack on Beirut, Zeviz.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Israel - Lebanon conflict in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #3
quote:
Originally written by Spring:

Lebanese Fear Israeli offensive

Infernal? You're there, aren't you?

Discuss.

Infernal isn't in Lebanon any more than you are, but thank you for giving her a pedestal on which to bloviate.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Off the top of your head in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #65
'There's no accounting for tastes' is the closest I can think of, and I believe it's Latin-derived.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Oh my God, you just can't make this **** up. in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #86
Is Jesus dead, then? :P
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Viva Italia !!!!!!! in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #199
quote:
Originally written by Stugri-La:

Really, I find the most disturbing thing about this affair to be the general reaction to it- from the media as well as the vast majority of soccer fans. The incident of the headbutting and its aftermath came up just as I was beginning to sense a growing liking within me for this game. I'd always found soccer crushingly boring, at least compared to my favorite sports: basketball, baseball, football, and tennis. So little scoring, so much running from end to end, so little excitement generated for me, a standard American sports fan.

But, you know, I was just beginning to gain an appreciation for the artistry of some of the shots and the subtle drama of the game, I watched the headbutt and the controversy it generated. And then, clearly, I saw what was wrong with this game, what makes it not truly worth watching.

Really, the biggest problem with soccer is that it's a game for goddamn fruitcakes. The reaction to the head-butting made that clear. All this whining about the crushing blow Zidane had made to the game and his own reputation. And I thought: how many times have I seen a brawl break out in a baskeball, basketball, football, or hockey game? Tons, and no one really bothered to whine and complain about the degeneration of the sport and the shame incurred by the players involved.

Physical contact is a part of sport. So is emotion, and, as a result, so is violence. Zidane's headbutt was not a calculated attempt to cause injury to the Italian player. It was simply an expression of anger in an emotionally charged game. By all means, it was proper that he should have been given the red card. But it is not proper that he should receive the lambasting he has suffered from the press and fans.

The endless decrying of the incident is yet another reason why soccer will never reach the mainstream popularity in America that it has in many other countries. The rest of you can continue to watch your stylish, graceful, emotionally vacant game, but I'll stick to my basketball, thank you.

As a fan of violent fouls, let me tell you - that was a glorious moment for me. For a brief moment, I was interested in soccer, because one man had headbutted another in the solar plexus. I have seen compilation clips of Zidane and appreciate his artistry on the field, but the average game involves maybe one or two of those moments of sublime genius stretched out over too much time to bother. Just point me to the violent fouls and we're all good.

Oh, and part of the reason Zidane got such a negative reaction: he's a magnificent player and that was to be his last game any which way (he announced an intention to retire). It's also widely perceived (to whatever degree of accuracy) that his removing himself in such a fashion lost France the cup.

When one of the best players in the game's career ends with a violent foul (and a damn fine violent foul), there's going to be noise made. It's unfortunate that the situation prevented a wider appreciation of what a fine foul it was.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00

Pages