Profile for Najosz Thjsza Kjras

Error message

Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /var/www/pied-piper.ermarian.net/includes/common.inc).

Recent posts

Pages

AuthorRecent posts
Native Americans in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #70
quote:
Originally written by Indifferent Salmon:

Any other questions on how Native Americans get treated?

Like most land animals, they require large areas to roam and collect forage. They also like interaction with others of their own species and tend to appreciate being noticed.

We've taken their land and confined them to limited areas of unfamiliar terrain. We've insisted that they learn a foriegn language and abandon all their customs. We mock them, insult them, name loser sports franchises after them, and now we seem to prefer discussions of economics over them.

IMAGE(http://stuff.ermarian.net/salmon/sucks.gif)

OH MY GOD

TOPIC DRIFT

QUICKLY FORM A TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMITTEE
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Native Americans in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #66
quote:
Originally written by Kelandon:

quote:
Originally written by Student of Trinity:

So if we talk about the plumber shortage as a noteworthy problem, I presume that the question is whether this is going to be a grave and intractable crisis.
I thought we were talking about what the best thing to do about it was. Letting it become a serious issue, cause a depression, and then fix itself over the course of a couple decades, all in the name of capitalist non-intervention, seems astonishingly stupid. If it's going to become a problem, it seems obvious that the best thing to do is to try to prevent it.

I'm not saying that I know exactly what to do, but I'm saying that "The market will correct itself" is too often a cop-out.

EDIT: The problem is the "in a couple of years" part. The market corrects itself eventually, but how long does it take, and what damage is done in the meantime? That's hard to predict.

The ideology of the free market is fundamentally opposed to conceptualizing what you refer to as 'damage'. To the free-market economist, the market turning down, people losing their job, and a few hundred thousand more homeless cropping up in the streets is a natural and healthy part of the economy.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Post Chat Snippets Completely Out Of Context in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #5
quote:
Originally written by Kelandon:

quote:
Originally written by Leena:

Alec: Kel: You don't really have a shot with Marlenny.
This one was the best, really. :P

Whatever you say, Mickey. :P

Drakefyre: I bear an unyielding grudge against you for sodomising my back yard
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Halo 3 in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #13
quote:
Originally written by Tyranicus:

IMAGE(http://www.shadowvale.net/goldeneye.jpg)
Quoted for truth.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Fluffy Turtles : The origins in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #22
The quoted post is a context clue.

Along with the image name.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Fluffy Turtles : The origins in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #20
quote:
Originally written by Archmage Alex:

IMAGE(http://stuff.ermarian.net/alexdrawings/fluffyanger.GIF)
IMAGE(http://alec.desperance.net/archmagealex.PNG)
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Native Americans in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #36
quote:
Originally written by Zeviz:

quote:
Originally written by too long, don't read, too many CRs:

... We need to understand why Asian kids from first generation immigrants are more likely to win highschool science prizes and transfer the essence of the magic potion. I just do not believe that these things are determined genetically. Maybe a special contest program would get American Indian kids motivated in some discipline that connects to their tradition.There should be plenty of potential sponsors who could buy publicity in this way.
As somebody mentioned in "president" thread, an important reason Asians and Jews do so well in school is strong family support. The parents force children to study hard. And since the culture places high value on education (at least for Jews, don't know about Asians), children are also more motivated themselves. Unfortunately, American schools don't force students to work hard, so if parents don't force them, and students themselves don't care, you end up with high school graduates who can't pass a basic literacy test.

Financial incentives would be good, but every carrot also needs a stick. For example, tying a part of welfare payments to how well kids do in school. (To discourage them from dropping out to get a job, or stay on welfare.) Of course this would work only if we actually fix the school system, pay teachers enough that not only those who couldn't get a better job would go into teaching, etc. And that's unlikely to happen.

I think punishing people for being on welfare is odd, but that's just me. If you need it, you need it.

And the reason Asian and Jewish kids do well in school isn't 'family support'. The Asian and Jewish kids that come here with money do quite well in school.

But then, you're talking (like any good, over-broadening American) about cases with strong exceptions.

Take the Jews. The western European Jews - the Germans especially - came to the country with a bit of money, a fair education, a good living standard, etc. We're talking some variant on middle class, no lower than lower middle class.

When America started getting exodoi from the Russian pogroms, on the other hand - the ones that made it here had next to nothing, were typically illiterate and superstitious, and generally had neither the means nor the inclination to learn the language.

Within the Jewish community in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, there was profound intranecine bigotry between the Western and Eastern Jews.

And the Russians and Poles and suchlike tend to remain poorer and worse-integrated than the Germans and the French and suchlike.

Take the Asians, for another example. The 'model minority'.

But that's because the 'model minority' had a decent standard of life.

The groups nobody talks about when you hear 'model minority' are the Vietnamese - the only large immigrant group to have come over for some reason besides middle-class advancement (refugees etc.) The Chinese and Japanese and whatnot tended to be literate, capable with large numbers, all that kind of thing. The Vietnamese? They had to learn that once they got here. And they had no money with which to do so.

Moral of the story? There's a cultural influence on education and assimilation. But by and large, the 'successful' minorities are the wealthy ones.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Fluffy Turtles : The origins in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #5
quote:
Originally written by URL=hotmail.com:
Hot Male[/URL]
quote:
Originally written by Zeviz:

quote:
Originally written by d3m0n5L4y3r:

A better question is: why do all message boards have to have some stupid little inside-joke-icon? Make it funny, at least.
Just like all other trends, some people like it and others pick it up to look cool.

The older members of the Spidweb community are also very accustomed to each other. When a new member joins, they may feel awkward or left out. So, to attract attention, patronize older members, and make himself or herself seem one of the group, they will adapt the group's customs. They really have no idea of the basis of the custom, but they do it anyway.

<small>[ May 09, 2006, 03:46 PM: Message edited by: URL=hotmail.com]Hot Male[/URL ]</small>

This is common to all groups.

As far as the 'fluffy turtles' crap goes, I'm older (in SW-years, anyway) than anyone who participates in that nonsense, and my memory is spotty, so I can't tell if someone maundering about them is a fraud or a moron.

I am usually charitable and assume moron.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Native Americans in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #33
Major, if this pabulum is indeed what passes for an understanding of demographics, statistics, and American history in the Sooner State, it becomes clear to me how very accurate your assertions on the comparative good fortune of your indigenous neighbors are.

[ Monday, May 08, 2006 23:39: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ]
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
"Policing" ourselves? in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #87
quote:
Originally written by too long, don't read, too many CRs:

I have occasion to revive this topic due to the following post:
quote:
Jumpin' Salmon ½ Man, ½ Amazing Member # 5755 written May 07, 2006 11:18 PM

Humans are gifted with the luxury of hindsight, and the feeling of emotional loss that may accompany it. It probably would have been "better" if native Americans had been 100% eliminated.
It would have meant much less suffering on the Rez, including the chronic alcoholism, drug addiction, and suicide that plague native Americans.
We could have marveled over artifacts such as spearpoints and pointed at intricate weavings or cave paintings and nodded sagely, confident that those long lost peoples were noble savages, one with the earth and able to communicate with the animals.

Bleagh.
I find this post is derogatory to a racial minority and violates the CoC. What do the oldbies think of this? Am I too sensitive? I do not want to be counted as a member of a forum where such offensive rubbish is posted.

Too kraut, didn't read
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
The Abominable Photo Thread IV: A New Hope in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #225
Let me guess: the boss has a scraggly beard and thinks of Sartre when he gets aroused.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Native Americans in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #21
quote:
Originally written by Major:

I think I have found the problem in this argument I'm only talking about where I live.
quote:
Compared to African Americans and Hispanics, Native Americans are by and large forgotten about in the US as a whole. Perhaps silent is not the right word, unheard would be better.

In the US yes in oklahoma no.

The Indians I know who actually live the life you describe - gov't money, no taxes, reservation and such - have had remarkably fast and poor lives. Maybe it's different from Oklahoma, but that seems to be the story for the American southwest in general.

quote:
How many people can name at least two African American civil rights leaders? How many can name the equivalent for Native Americans?

I can't name two for either :P
But, yes blacks have made a big deal about it compared to indians.

You can't name two for either? I learned about Malcolm X and MLK in middle school. And if there's something wrong, there ought to be a big deal made, oughtn't there?

quote:
As far as what's been done relative to the atrocities (which pale in comparison to other minorities), it has been pathetically small. Not saying absolutely nothing, but comparatively nothing.

Yes again for the US no again for oklahoma(I'm not saying that they are as bad as other races(I hate that term) it's just that they getting alot.

You realize that Oklahoma has near to no indigenous population, right? The Indians living there are there as a consequence of being driven out of Georgia on foot. Look up the 'Trail of Tears' sometime. While the current situation might seem unjust to you, it's been worse... much worse.

quote:
Also, saying their privledged really is sort of insulting considering that statistics put their average economic status well below all other ethnic groups in the US.
Ok I maybe shouldn't have put such emphises on privledged. But, I was just trying to point out that they aren't doing bad here.

Maybe not the visible ones. The ones on the reservation tend to live pretty piss-poor lives no matter where the reservation is.

quote:
Face it, we destroyed them and have done very little to get them up to the level as everyone else.
Has any other nation given another nation it's own nation when they conquered them? Oh and by the way there up to the level here. :) (I am 1/32 indian myself)


There's really no comparison in history for what the US did to the Indians (and other American countries, too - I'm just more familiar with here). And even if there were, would we really want to console ourselves saying 'Hey, we're at least better than that'? It's kind of like people who look at Iraq and say 'Hey, at least we aren't like Saddam Hussein'. As if we can't do any better.

And I'm 1/16... uncle tom. :P


Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Native Americans in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #7
Pound for pound, the worst single crime against humanity ever committed.

You can change its position on the metaphorical list by examining intent, but when you get right down to it, 20 to 50 million people died and the survivors were driven onto the least hospitable land on the continent and forced to eke out a miserable living - a status that continues to this day.

...

Of course, where exactly a right-wing Israeli gets off lecturing Americans on the treatment of the Amerinds - I don't precisely know. But that's not my intellectual burden to bear, so I'll say no more of it.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Yom HaShoa in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #77
quote:
Originally written by Strontium:


It is also true that Germany systematically went about defying the Allies, breaking the Treaty of Versailles and rearming, etc for several years and started a war without any real opposition. IT has been argued by some that the Allies were looking to the east as the real threat (Communisim) and were hoping that Germany and Russia would slit each others throats as they stood idly by. Note too that even after the war started, the western border was thinly defended and there was opportunity to invade from France, in support of Poland, but the allies stood by and watched Poland fall. This too was a realistic opportunity to stop Hitler, in the early stages of a war yes, but surely would have prevented many millions of deaths.

Do you have to take a course to get this ignorant?

a) Germany and Russia were *allies* in 1939; they carved up Poland together. The 'let them kill each other' attitude didn't become relevant until the Soviets were already technically in the Allied camp.

b) The Western border might have been thinly defended, but the German army was ludicrously oversized and mostly based on highly mobile forces. France could not have won an offensive war, even if it weren't for what I'm going to get to momentarily. The Allies recognized this; their throwing in with Poland could not in a million years have translated to direct offensive aid. It was instead intended as a pledge to bleed Germany dry and liberate Poland once they surrendered.

c) It was entirely reasonable to assume a defensive campaign would have worked against Germany. The actual site of the invasion was miserable tank country; the remainder of the border was overlooked by the most powerful fortification ever built. The German army was larger than the Allied army, and relied on strategic mobility. An offensive war against a quick-moving, larger army is a mug's game.

d) The Wehrmacht conquered western Europe with fewer casualties than the US took at Antietam. Poland was a clear demonstration of that trend.

e) To summarize and analogize, you faulting the Allies here in specific is rather like getting angry at a lifeguard for failing to respond to a shark sighted at a beach by swimming out to take it out personally. Germany was a freaking titan. Fighting the war differently would have been criminal, and disastrous.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
How would you deal with an acquainted killer? in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #23
Aran must have had a strange, strange childhood.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
How would you deal with an acquainted killer? in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #20
There are a number of stereotypes of the Germans here, most fairly benign (at least compared to our stereotypes of others).

'Inscrutable, but vaguely sinister' is the one that that particular strip went for. (When it was made, two years ago - note the date-stamp at the end.)

It was, in not so many words, my way of indicating you had lost me, but I wasn't entirely ready to take full blame for that.

--

As a diction note - the sort I despise when used in legitimate discussion, so I'm getting it out of the way now - I didn't intend the connotation you drew from 'anecdote'. The word was the best I could think of to apply to a series of short biographical sketches that each worked to illustrate a point; while it is often applied to humorous stories, it doesn't have to be.

--

It is too late to make sense of everything right now, so I will leave you with what I can say coherently.

Stacking the deck.

People are not particularly frail. Your father is a fine example; he survived the war, and while he did have vivid flashbacks as a consequence of it, he certainly managed to father at least you in the interim.

The same goes for three, maybe four generations of Germans - someone they knew died in some war or another, and one of those generations would be unaccountably lucky not to see fighting. A substantial fraction of two of those participated in one of history's worst atrocities, then went home and lived normal lives, raised normal families, and died of heart attacks, cancer, and the other afflictions that do in old men.

For every war veteran who goes crazy and kills a small family, loses his grip on reality and pitches his hopes to the race, the dice, or the bottle, or simply refuses to go on - there are hundreds, maybe a thousand more who live out quiet lives as if nothing ever happened, who go from firing blindly into shattered buildings to unwilling to run a red light.

War is hell, but it's a buttoned-off kind of hell you can walk into and out of.

That's all I can think to say coherently. It's 3 am here.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Question 3: Disease in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #27
quote:
Originally written by Kelandon:

quote:
Originally written by Student of Trinity:

There's nothing like a devastating plague to turn a settled continent into a new frontier, with lots of job opportunities for everyone left.
Which leads me back to my main point: Black Death caused the Renaissance.

No it didn't, you buffoon. The fall of Constantinople caused the Renaissance. The Black Death at most created an environment conducive to it, and even that is highly debatable.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
The Abominable Photo Thread IV: A New Hope in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #184
IMAGE(http://photos-101.facebook.com/n29/195/42/23704612/n23704612_30133101_1770.jpg)
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
How would you deal with an acquainted killer? in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #17
quote:
Originally written by Dagon:

quote:
Originally written by Dolphin.:

Hmm, mail order Germans huh, Aran…

Oh, uh, moving along…

I assure you that I cannot be ordered, by mail, catalogue or otherwise. You'll have to make do with the photo threads.

Ah, but you didn't rule out the possibility of patronizing German Hut.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
Question 3: Disease in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #6
quote:
Originally written by *i:

How do we control and deal with the spread of deadly epidemics in a highly connected global society?
Pray.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
How would you deal with an acquainted killer? in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #4
EDIT: As a compromise, because the image is rather unhelpfully long but half of the thread makes no more sense now:

http://alec.desperance.net/longstripgerman.PNG

Beware: swears, sexuality, and mangled German.

Also, in order to be helpful:

I wouldn't think much of it. You could be a professional, prize-winning colombophile in your spare time, or you could have killed a man just to watch him die in between posts. People bring fairly little to an online relationship.

The people who I know well online - the sort of people who I'd know if they raced pigeons or killed people at random - are people who I doubt would go around murdering. And if they did, well, I'd have the same kind of reaction as I'd have to someone I knew in person.

I'd be unsettled, sure. Maybe a little disgusted. But ultimately, killing someone was their call, not mine, and has nothing to do with me.

And I don't see the relevance of the .iq anecdotes. Although I understand your seemingly pathological desire to drag the American government through the mud at any given opportunity, the examples given don't seem to have any serious relevance to the question at hand.

[ Friday, May 05, 2006 00:16: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ]
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
US and Sudan in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #59
One of my favorite - by which I mean most entertaining - reads as far as military history goes is the eXile's War Nerd.

He is entertaining and edifying on this topic as any other:

http://www.exile.ru/2004-May-27/war_nerd.html
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
If You Were President... in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #15
quote:
Originally written by Butt Paladin:

Increasing federal spending for public education. Massive increases of foreign aid to stave off starvation and easily-preventable diseases. Repealing Welfare-2-Work and replacing it with a social net capable of catching something smaller than a barn. Strengthening Affirmative Action to solve the massive unemployment rate of urban blacks (and males in particular). Increased public transportation spending to allow said urban African-Americans to reach their jobs. Massive tax hikes for the rich. Nuclear disarmament. Nuclear power. Increase of minimum wage to a liveable minimum. Socialized health care. Recognition of labor unions. Disestablishing religion. Prohibiting corporations from hiring children abroad and forcing globalized corporations to pay a minimum wage for all workers abroad.
TM has pretty much got it.

I'd also want to establish the groundwork for global government (e.g. taking an active military role in humanitarian situations, and treating economic problems in the third world as a direct problem of the United States), but that's not something I'd expect to happen in my lifetime.

///////////////

EDIT: Part of why I want near-total nuclear disarmament is this: we only need maybe 10-20 to act as an effective deterrent, and nukes don't win wars, period.

A single nuke is awful, but survivable. Two to four and there's going to be social panic; the government is doomed. Four to ten and there's going to be mass casualties and serious infrastructural damage - the sort of thing the economy will take forever to recover from. Any national momentum is gone, and they won't be making war effectively for generations.

Ten to twenty? That many nukes will devastate the local ecology for centuries, cause millions of immediate deaths and skew the population by double digit percentages over the long run, and will essentially be the local eschaton - an event from which there is no escape, affecting every part of social consciousness.

Three nukes will kill a government. Seven nukes will kill a country. Fifteen nukes will kill a nation.

The US stockpile, capable of scouring a decameter or so off the surface of the planet? They're conspicuous consumption, like a civilian buying a Hummer. No use in that much firepower.

[ Wednesday, May 03, 2006 16:48: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ]
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
The Abominable Photo Thread IV: A New Hope in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #144
quote:
Originally written by spy-there:


Saunders and her man look indeed very happy on that picture. As if they were recently married. Hence congrats to your lucky match, Saunders.

They have several children, some older than certain SWers.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00
US and Sudan in General
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
Profile #47
quote:
Originally written by radix malorum est cupiditas:

quote:
Originally written by The Worst Man Ever:

Why so indignant? Isn't that just what you've been proposing needs to be done to the 'Muslim theocracies'? If you're going to play by barbaric rules, don't turn around and get pissy if the other side is in the habit of the same.
I suggest reading the posts you quote before you comment about them. My reasoning for what needs to be done to the muslim theocracys is because of this.

Uh.

From the brief research I have done on the subject, and please correct me if I am wrong:

In 1948, there was indeed an unprovoked attack by Arab states on Israel. The states were dictatorships and monarchies; characterizing them as 'theocracies' verges on insane. Israel won the war and, in so doing, annexed a substantial amount of what would have been Palestinian territory.

In 1956, Egypt nationalized the Suez Company, and in response, France and England essentially used Israel as a cat's-paw, attacking Egypt by proxy and managing to keep the Suez Canal open. Hardly self-defense.

In 1967 there occurred the Six Day War: for whatever reason, Egypt elected to blockade Aqaba, closing access for Israel to the Red Sea. Israel proceeded to launch a 'pre-emptive attack' on Egypt and seize the Sinai, along with various other territories they had a strategic but not legal reason to occupy. This was essentially a war of aggression on Israel's part.

In 1973, mostly in retribution for the 1967 war, Egypt and Syria invaded, intent on reclaiming territories lost.

After the cease-fire, a series of conferences eventually lead to recognition for Israel from Egypt - conditional on Israeli withdrawal from the Sinai.

The lesson to be learned here? Simple. In three/four/five wars (depending on whether you count the Suez Crisis as a war, or the War of Attrition), Israel at its zenith managed to, what? Seize a few thousand square miles of desert? It wasn't until they gave the ridiculous siege-mentality 'We have to get them or they'll get us' a rest and actually took Egypt to the table that they got anything done.

An auxillary lesson is that Israel had an exceptional amount of culpability in any given international war it fought in (except 1948 - granted). That's auxillary because it doesn't make a whit of difference. You can't have security until you have peace, and someone who will only settle for victory will have to wait for peace until the other side - the Arabs here, I suppose - is dead.

If that's how it's going to go - well, they have a word for when a country gets together and kills millions of a specific race because they believe it's the only way to keep them in line.

I'm sure you know it.

And in other news -

Sudan. Hell of a thing.

Sudan would have been a better investment of American troops than Iraq.

Before you start objecting - the government of Sudan has been systematically ravaging the southern black population for years and years. Before Iraq. Maybe before Bush.

George Bush had a chance to stop the genocide in Sudan and he didn't. Just like George Bush has squandered every other God-damn chance to do a gram of good to humanity.

But Sudan, of course, doesn't have oil. And it's only tangentially related geographically to the petro-crescent.

So Bush, no matter what he has to say on the subject, doesn't care about Sudan. When he says it's genocide, he's admitting his own failure as he swipes at the UN.

Except nobody's calling him to account for that failure. His amen corner chuckles smarmily at the failings of the rest of the world and doesn't even consider what he could have done.

Or still can.

But won't.

Bastard.

[ Tuesday, May 02, 2006 15:48: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ]
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00

Pages