Profile for Najosz Thjsza Kjras
Field | Value |
---|---|
Displayed name | Najosz Thjsza Kjras |
Member number | 6388 |
Title | Lifecrafter |
Postcount | 794 |
Homepage | |
Registered | Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Recent posts
Pages
Author | Recent posts |
---|---|
Native Americans in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 03:32
Profile
quote:OH MY GOD TOPIC DRIFT QUICKLY FORM A TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMITTEE Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Native Americans in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Saturday, May 13 2006 19:15
Profile
quote:The ideology of the free market is fundamentally opposed to conceptualizing what you refer to as 'damage'. To the free-market economist, the market turning down, people losing their job, and a few hundred thousand more homeless cropping up in the streets is a natural and healthy part of the economy. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Post Chat Snippets Completely Out Of Context in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Wednesday, May 10 2006 21:29
Profile
quote:Whatever you say, Mickey. :P Drakefyre: I bear an unyielding grudge against you for sodomising my back yard Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Halo 3 in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Wednesday, May 10 2006 20:42
Profile
quote:Quoted for truth. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Fluffy Turtles : The origins in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Wednesday, May 10 2006 20:25
Profile
The quoted post is a context clue. Along with the image name. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Fluffy Turtles : The origins in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Wednesday, May 10 2006 19:07
Profile
quote: Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Native Americans in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Tuesday, May 9 2006 15:32
Profile
quote:I think punishing people for being on welfare is odd, but that's just me. If you need it, you need it. And the reason Asian and Jewish kids do well in school isn't 'family support'. The Asian and Jewish kids that come here with money do quite well in school. But then, you're talking (like any good, over-broadening American) about cases with strong exceptions. Take the Jews. The western European Jews - the Germans especially - came to the country with a bit of money, a fair education, a good living standard, etc. We're talking some variant on middle class, no lower than lower middle class. When America started getting exodoi from the Russian pogroms, on the other hand - the ones that made it here had next to nothing, were typically illiterate and superstitious, and generally had neither the means nor the inclination to learn the language. Within the Jewish community in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, there was profound intranecine bigotry between the Western and Eastern Jews. And the Russians and Poles and suchlike tend to remain poorer and worse-integrated than the Germans and the French and suchlike. Take the Asians, for another example. The 'model minority'. But that's because the 'model minority' had a decent standard of life. The groups nobody talks about when you hear 'model minority' are the Vietnamese - the only large immigrant group to have come over for some reason besides middle-class advancement (refugees etc.) The Chinese and Japanese and whatnot tended to be literate, capable with large numbers, all that kind of thing. The Vietnamese? They had to learn that once they got here. And they had no money with which to do so. Moral of the story? There's a cultural influence on education and assimilation. But by and large, the 'successful' minorities are the wealthy ones. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Fluffy Turtles : The origins in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Tuesday, May 9 2006 15:15
Profile
quote:This is common to all groups. As far as the 'fluffy turtles' crap goes, I'm older (in SW-years, anyway) than anyone who participates in that nonsense, and my memory is spotty, so I can't tell if someone maundering about them is a fraud or a moron. I am usually charitable and assume moron. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Native Americans in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Monday, May 8 2006 23:38
Profile
Major, if this pabulum is indeed what passes for an understanding of demographics, statistics, and American history in the Sooner State, it becomes clear to me how very accurate your assertions on the comparative good fortune of your indigenous neighbors are. [ Monday, May 08, 2006 23:39: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ] Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
"Policing" ourselves? in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Monday, May 8 2006 12:18
Profile
quote:Too kraut, didn't read Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
The Abominable Photo Thread IV: A New Hope in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Monday, May 8 2006 12:17
Profile
Let me guess: the boss has a scraggly beard and thinks of Sartre when he gets aroused. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Native Americans in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Monday, May 8 2006 12:10
Profile
quote: Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Native Americans in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Sunday, May 7 2006 15:40
Profile
Pound for pound, the worst single crime against humanity ever committed. You can change its position on the metaphorical list by examining intent, but when you get right down to it, 20 to 50 million people died and the survivors were driven onto the least hospitable land on the continent and forced to eke out a miserable living - a status that continues to this day. ... Of course, where exactly a right-wing Israeli gets off lecturing Americans on the treatment of the Amerinds - I don't precisely know. But that's not my intellectual burden to bear, so I'll say no more of it. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Yom HaShoa in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Saturday, May 6 2006 02:58
Profile
quote:Do you have to take a course to get this ignorant? a) Germany and Russia were *allies* in 1939; they carved up Poland together. The 'let them kill each other' attitude didn't become relevant until the Soviets were already technically in the Allied camp. b) The Western border might have been thinly defended, but the German army was ludicrously oversized and mostly based on highly mobile forces. France could not have won an offensive war, even if it weren't for what I'm going to get to momentarily. The Allies recognized this; their throwing in with Poland could not in a million years have translated to direct offensive aid. It was instead intended as a pledge to bleed Germany dry and liberate Poland once they surrendered. c) It was entirely reasonable to assume a defensive campaign would have worked against Germany. The actual site of the invasion was miserable tank country; the remainder of the border was overlooked by the most powerful fortification ever built. The German army was larger than the Allied army, and relied on strategic mobility. An offensive war against a quick-moving, larger army is a mug's game. d) The Wehrmacht conquered western Europe with fewer casualties than the US took at Antietam. Poland was a clear demonstration of that trend. e) To summarize and analogize, you faulting the Allies here in specific is rather like getting angry at a lifeguard for failing to respond to a shark sighted at a beach by swimming out to take it out personally. Germany was a freaking titan. Fighting the war differently would have been criminal, and disastrous. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
How would you deal with an acquainted killer? in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Saturday, May 6 2006 02:43
Profile
Aran must have had a strange, strange childhood. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
How would you deal with an acquainted killer? in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Saturday, May 6 2006 01:32
Profile
There are a number of stereotypes of the Germans here, most fairly benign (at least compared to our stereotypes of others). 'Inscrutable, but vaguely sinister' is the one that that particular strip went for. (When it was made, two years ago - note the date-stamp at the end.) It was, in not so many words, my way of indicating you had lost me, but I wasn't entirely ready to take full blame for that. -- As a diction note - the sort I despise when used in legitimate discussion, so I'm getting it out of the way now - I didn't intend the connotation you drew from 'anecdote'. The word was the best I could think of to apply to a series of short biographical sketches that each worked to illustrate a point; while it is often applied to humorous stories, it doesn't have to be. -- It is too late to make sense of everything right now, so I will leave you with what I can say coherently. Stacking the deck. People are not particularly frail. Your father is a fine example; he survived the war, and while he did have vivid flashbacks as a consequence of it, he certainly managed to father at least you in the interim. The same goes for three, maybe four generations of Germans - someone they knew died in some war or another, and one of those generations would be unaccountably lucky not to see fighting. A substantial fraction of two of those participated in one of history's worst atrocities, then went home and lived normal lives, raised normal families, and died of heart attacks, cancer, and the other afflictions that do in old men. For every war veteran who goes crazy and kills a small family, loses his grip on reality and pitches his hopes to the race, the dice, or the bottle, or simply refuses to go on - there are hundreds, maybe a thousand more who live out quiet lives as if nothing ever happened, who go from firing blindly into shattered buildings to unwilling to run a red light. War is hell, but it's a buttoned-off kind of hell you can walk into and out of. That's all I can think to say coherently. It's 3 am here. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Question 3: Disease in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Friday, May 5 2006 17:37
Profile
quote:No it didn't, you buffoon. The fall of Constantinople caused the Renaissance. The Black Death at most created an environment conducive to it, and even that is highly debatable. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
The Abominable Photo Thread IV: A New Hope in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Friday, May 5 2006 15:24
Profile
Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
How would you deal with an acquainted killer? in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Friday, May 5 2006 13:30
Profile
quote:Ah, but you didn't rule out the possibility of patronizing German Hut. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
Question 3: Disease in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Thursday, May 4 2006 15:27
Profile
quote:Pray. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
How would you deal with an acquainted killer? in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Thursday, May 4 2006 15:23
Profile
EDIT: As a compromise, because the image is rather unhelpfully long but half of the thread makes no more sense now: http://alec.desperance.net/longstripgerman.PNG Beware: swears, sexuality, and mangled German. Also, in order to be helpful: I wouldn't think much of it. You could be a professional, prize-winning colombophile in your spare time, or you could have killed a man just to watch him die in between posts. People bring fairly little to an online relationship. The people who I know well online - the sort of people who I'd know if they raced pigeons or killed people at random - are people who I doubt would go around murdering. And if they did, well, I'd have the same kind of reaction as I'd have to someone I knew in person. I'd be unsettled, sure. Maybe a little disgusted. But ultimately, killing someone was their call, not mine, and has nothing to do with me. And I don't see the relevance of the .iq anecdotes. Although I understand your seemingly pathological desire to drag the American government through the mud at any given opportunity, the examples given don't seem to have any serious relevance to the question at hand. [ Friday, May 05, 2006 00:16: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ] Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
US and Sudan in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Wednesday, May 3 2006 17:04
Profile
One of my favorite - by which I mean most entertaining - reads as far as military history goes is the eXile's War Nerd. He is entertaining and edifying on this topic as any other: http://www.exile.ru/2004-May-27/war_nerd.html Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
If You Were President... in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Wednesday, May 3 2006 16:38
Profile
quote:TM has pretty much got it. I'd also want to establish the groundwork for global government (e.g. taking an active military role in humanitarian situations, and treating economic problems in the third world as a direct problem of the United States), but that's not something I'd expect to happen in my lifetime. /////////////// EDIT: Part of why I want near-total nuclear disarmament is this: we only need maybe 10-20 to act as an effective deterrent, and nukes don't win wars, period. A single nuke is awful, but survivable. Two to four and there's going to be social panic; the government is doomed. Four to ten and there's going to be mass casualties and serious infrastructural damage - the sort of thing the economy will take forever to recover from. Any national momentum is gone, and they won't be making war effectively for generations. Ten to twenty? That many nukes will devastate the local ecology for centuries, cause millions of immediate deaths and skew the population by double digit percentages over the long run, and will essentially be the local eschaton - an event from which there is no escape, affecting every part of social consciousness. Three nukes will kill a government. Seven nukes will kill a country. Fifteen nukes will kill a nation. The US stockpile, capable of scouring a decameter or so off the surface of the planet? They're conspicuous consumption, like a civilian buying a Hummer. No use in that much firepower. [ Wednesday, May 03, 2006 16:48: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ] Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
The Abominable Photo Thread IV: A New Hope in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Tuesday, May 2 2006 17:31
Profile
quote:They have several children, some older than certain SWers. Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |
US and Sudan in General | |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6388
|
written Tuesday, May 2 2006 15:25
Profile
quote:Uh. From the brief research I have done on the subject, and please correct me if I am wrong: In 1948, there was indeed an unprovoked attack by Arab states on Israel. The states were dictatorships and monarchies; characterizing them as 'theocracies' verges on insane. Israel won the war and, in so doing, annexed a substantial amount of what would have been Palestinian territory. In 1956, Egypt nationalized the Suez Company, and in response, France and England essentially used Israel as a cat's-paw, attacking Egypt by proxy and managing to keep the Suez Canal open. Hardly self-defense. In 1967 there occurred the Six Day War: for whatever reason, Egypt elected to blockade Aqaba, closing access for Israel to the Red Sea. Israel proceeded to launch a 'pre-emptive attack' on Egypt and seize the Sinai, along with various other territories they had a strategic but not legal reason to occupy. This was essentially a war of aggression on Israel's part. In 1973, mostly in retribution for the 1967 war, Egypt and Syria invaded, intent on reclaiming territories lost. After the cease-fire, a series of conferences eventually lead to recognition for Israel from Egypt - conditional on Israeli withdrawal from the Sinai. The lesson to be learned here? Simple. In three/four/five wars (depending on whether you count the Suez Crisis as a war, or the War of Attrition), Israel at its zenith managed to, what? Seize a few thousand square miles of desert? It wasn't until they gave the ridiculous siege-mentality 'We have to get them or they'll get us' a rest and actually took Egypt to the table that they got anything done. An auxillary lesson is that Israel had an exceptional amount of culpability in any given international war it fought in (except 1948 - granted). That's auxillary because it doesn't make a whit of difference. You can't have security until you have peace, and someone who will only settle for victory will have to wait for peace until the other side - the Arabs here, I suppose - is dead. If that's how it's going to go - well, they have a word for when a country gets together and kills millions of a specific race because they believe it's the only way to keep them in line. I'm sure you know it. And in other news - Sudan. Hell of a thing. Sudan would have been a better investment of American troops than Iraq. Before you start objecting - the government of Sudan has been systematically ravaging the southern black population for years and years. Before Iraq. Maybe before Bush. George Bush had a chance to stop the genocide in Sudan and he didn't. Just like George Bush has squandered every other God-damn chance to do a gram of good to humanity. But Sudan, of course, doesn't have oil. And it's only tangentially related geographically to the petro-crescent. So Bush, no matter what he has to say on the subject, doesn't care about Sudan. When he says it's genocide, he's admitting his own failure as he swipes at the UN. Except nobody's calling him to account for that failure. His amen corner chuckles smarmily at the failings of the rest of the world and doesn't even consider what he could have done. Or still can. But won't. Bastard. [ Tuesday, May 02, 2006 15:48: Message edited by: The Worst Man Ever ] Posts: 794 | Registered: Tuesday, October 11 2005 07:00 |