Profile for The Immortal

Error message

Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /var/www/pied-piper.ermarian.net/includes/common.inc).

Recent posts

Pages

AuthorRecent posts
Describe in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #1
Last thing you ate: Wheat thins
What you're wearing right now: Tan fleece, plaid button-up, blue jeans
Describe the room you are in: Cellar, red, yellow and black tiles, wooden walls, block glass windows

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Eep! Christians! (Split from Christian Radio) in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #144
Doctors have a good track record of curing what diseases I get.

I will trust them until I get screwed.

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
The Conservative Shift in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #27
quote:
The sad thing is, the propaganda machine isn't even particularly strong -- it's just that there is absolutely no resistance to it.
Dude. That's a contradiction. An unquestioned propaganda machine is a successful one. (So is one which we pretend doesn't exist.) Or rather- how else could the Republicans Lite (aka "dems") be so successfully de-testicled?

quote:
I realize that arguing with you is futile because everything I say is obviously wrong.
Irony is, your sarcastic statement just so happens to be true.

[ Wednesday, February 22, 2006 19:16: Message edited by: Prometheus ]

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
The Conservative Shift in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #24
"People hate Bush for starting a war,"
Yeah. Poor bush- people hate him for generating insane amounts of body piles. It's just not fair for the insanely wealthy and sociopathic anymore.

"the Ten Commandments are being taken out of our courtrooms,"
We do not try people by the laws of your backwards, primitive and ontologically-challenged deity, however much you like to think that you "burn-in-hell-and-like-it" types have the copyright on screwing people over.

"and all talk of Jesus is banned from our public schools."
It's a state-operated venture. There are plenty of places to pray. The classroom is no such place, and every time prayer is conducted, the big lie of america's being the christian paradise is steadily furthered.

"It's more of a liberal shift if you ask me."
Nobody did. Go back in your hole.

"It just seems different because we conservatives have picked up a few executive seats."
A few executive seats? If you mean executive, then you cold-blooded killers have all of them. That's how it works.
If you mean legislative or judicial, then your statement is less vaccuous.

"But that's just because we're so good at getting the point across."
Yeah. And that point is, 'Elect bush or you might just become impotent or a fag.'

EDIT: And something to be more disturbed about- when, in any point in history (including the 1940s), has the propaganda machine been stronger? Hell, when has it been even half as strong?

[ Wednesday, February 22, 2006 18:49: Message edited by: Prometheus ]

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
The Conservative Shift in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #17
You poor, persecuted christian.

I'm having a fiddle concert tonight. No need to worry about the lighting.

We'll be serving freshly-fed lions for the main course.

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
The Conservative Shift in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #15
quote:
Originally written by Kelandon:

The left agrees on far too little.
I find the notion that the democrats are "leftist" to be repugnant.

quote:
Originally written by Ash Lael:

I was looking at the "shift" (real or imagined, suit yourself) from an objective point of view, and in response I get a personal attack. That, my friend, is a staggering act of dickheadery.
Way to play the religion card.

In particular, I find your contention that the "shift" is "real or imagined" to be one hell of a backpedaling from the victory dance you were doing at the beginning of the thread.

If nothing else, Alec's "attack" (and I take objection with this insinuation as well) is deserved. I could go further, but at this point, I scarcely have to.

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Census of Spiderweb community in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #43
quote:
Originally written by Tyranicus:

porking a turkey.
...

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
The Conservative Shift in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #8
Where the hell have you been for the last 4 years?

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Census ][ in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #1
Means of transportation to work/school: City bus
A RL nickname not previously mentioned here: None
Worst choice of Halloween costume you've ever had: They're all tied
A mythological figure you identify with: Mythology is the culture of philistines.
A Simpsons character you identify with: Smithers
Favorite Sesame Street character: Oscar
Favorite Spidweb game character: Garzahd by far.
Favorite (English) word: Lethargy
Favorite cereal: I don't eat cereal

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
What Movies Are You Looking Forward To? in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #15
quote:
Originally written by Hanttiworker:

Wait, Eragon? They're making that awful, badly written Tolkien-rip into a movie? And you're expecting to see it?

What the hell is wrong with you people?

In case it's not the same story, excuse upper remark.

quote:
Originally written by Wikipedia:

There has been much criticism of Eragon, regarding everything from word usage to the marketing techniques (critics deride the labelling of the author as a "prodigy" or "wunderkind"). The book's most frequent criticism is that it uses far too many clichés. Paolini employs stock characters, such as Elves, Dwarves, and a pseudo-orcish race known as Urgals, complete with an elite sect known as the Kull, comparable to Saruman's uruk-hai.

There has been much debate over whether incorporating Elves and Dwarves similar to Tolkien's is derivative or honorific. On the subject of Tolkien, it has also been pointed out that many names in Eragon resemble those in Tolkien's work, such as Arya (comparable to Arwen), Isenstar (comparable to Isengard), and Mithrim (comparable to mithril). The name Eragon itself closely resembles Aragorn. There is also mention of Angrenost, the Sindarin name for Isengard. There is also a note of the naming of the Beor mountains coming from Beorn, which is another word for bear. In The Hobbit, there is a character known as Beorn, who has the ability to transform into a bear. On the map of Alagaësia, the spelling of the place name Melian is identical to the name of the character Melian the Maia of Tolkien's The Silmarillion. The Grey Folk, said to be the first few magical beings resemble the Sindarin, who are the Grey Elves. These are a few examples of what is believed to be a wider occurrence.

Yet another criticism is that the plot closely resembles that of the original Star Wars saga. Characters are also similar, down to Brom who is supposedly the last of his order. Paolini countered these two remarks by stating that most fantasy is derivative, and that Star Wars has heavy ties to Buck Rogers and Dune. Furthermore, he also believed Tolkien to echo a famous Norse myth about a ring that made a dwarf invisible, made popular by Richard Wagner's epic opera series "Der Ring des Nibelungen", or "Ring of the Nibelung," despite the fact that Tolkien himself once said; "Both rings were round and there the rescemblance ceased."

Critics also conjectured that Paolini had the characters of Eragon act unrealistically while performing a myriad of fantasy clichés, such as "shedding a single tear" or reflecting in needless arcane speech: "When he would return, he knew not."



--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
The Conservative Shift in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #3
Part of the reason for the shift is people claiming that there's a shift.

Other reasons include:

* We are all ultimately mindless and cruel barbarians
* We need to be reactionary but the status-quo is the shambles of postmodernism
* Humanity has lost its empathy and needs a way to compensate

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Census of Spiderweb community in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #6
Age: 18
Sex*: Male
Sexual orientation: Heterosexual
Marital status: Single
Highest educational degree completed: Secondary
City/metropolitan area where you live: Milwaukee
Ethnic origin: Caucasian
Nationality: American (sadly)
First/primary language: English
Religion: Atheist
How long you've been a Spiderwebber: 6 years
Whether or not you're a septuagenarian eskimo: No

* Sex is biological; gender is sociological. One's gender may be female despite possessing male faculties.

[ Tuesday, February 21, 2006 16:07: Message edited by: Prometheus ]

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Exit Strategy (Realized) in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #21
1. You're going to return anyway.
2. At least you make for a better sparring partner than a fundamentalist.
If you're leaving because I'm a harsh debater, grant me this time to laugh.

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Eep! Christians! (Split from Christian Radio) in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #84
This topic has easily blown out of proportion. I will respond to the points that I find most objectionable by far:

quote:
Even with pure social justice, there would still be that pesky Entropy, always spiraling towards our inevitable doom. Physical existence is inherently unjust. Pain exists. If all people were to drop religion and capitalism in its tracks, pain would still exist. People would stub their toes. People would strain muscles during over-enthusiastic coitus. People would be crushed by machinery. People would get sick. Regardless of their worth as human beings.
Excuse me, but "strained muscles and stubbed toes" does not make a case for eliminating massive bloodshed and trying to reduce suffering wherever it's seen. The goal is to eliminate all pain, and even though we can't possibly eliminate all of it, we should attempt to come as close as possible. Nobody will die for sake of a stubbed toe, but plenty will die from easily-preventable diseases and starvation on a daily basis.

quote:
In an absurdly unjust, and unchangable, physical situation, why not believe in metaphysics.
Because it only makes things worse. All your flimsy excuse does is wipe this world's tragedies under the rug. Most forms of "enlightened" religion are bad enough- your take, however, is absolutely obscene.

quote:
God as a sentient entity isn't quite necessary as part of a just metaphysical existence, but a concept of good, independent of human consciousness, is.
That is one of the primary reasons why I reject metaphysics. Why even bother with metaphysical understanding when it is not a force in the world in which we live?

quote:
IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, IT JUST SO HAPPENS THAT THE MASCULINE PRONOUN IS USED IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE GENDER OF THE ANTECEDENT IS NEUTRAL. I TRIED, BUT IDIOM SNUCK UP ON ME. SO SUE ME.
Chauvinist pig.

Ephesos:
quote:
(Did the reforms of the civil rights movement disappear after King died? I think not!)
I take exception to this statement.

quote:
An objective reason? No. Guess not. I think it'd be considerably less statisfying if there was, too.
Grandstanding for your faith is not as popular as you might think.

quote:
I don't think you can back that one up. You can make arguments that it has solely practical value, which would be irrelevant or redundant in an abstract, ideal situation. But working has value simply based on our biological makeup (production of endorphins comes to mind). Biologically, we are put together to be able to do work.
Didn't I beat the liberal materialism out of you before? ~_~

If all we exist to do is reproduce, then you're doing a good job of not doing so by posting on this message board. Unless you're admitting that your genes don't deserve to be passed down, in which case I encourage you to kill yourself.

quote:
I just know I see and experience something of God in it when I encounter it. When it is coupled with a heightened link to the heart and mind of God, it is all the more potent and reliable.
I have countered this already, and pages ago at that.

1. If you're saying that empathy can always be improved by believing in god, then you are being alienatory.
2. If you're implying that believing in god has nothing to do with human empathy, why believe in a god, unless there is something more important than empathy?

quote:
The privilege is to serve humankind with greater capacity, ability, and authority. It’s about service, not to rule over any other in any coercive way.
Then I direct you back to countless arguments I've made in the past about god-and-empathy. Honestly, I'm more pissed right now that you've been tossing around words that you've given absolutely no context for.

quote:
For the body to be healthy, the cells need to be working harmoniously with and for each other. It’s not done till every last one of us from every time and place gets there. That’s the scale of the goodness of God I know.
I seriously don't expect to get an answer for this, but why is god required in here?

quote:
Our training, growth, “work” as you call it, is so that we all grow up and learn to take care of ourselves, each other, this earth and everything in it, and then we’ll see what we have to tend beyond that.
Let me give you a pre-emptive answer: NOTHING.

quote:
If some “grow up” into the ways of love secured by relationship with God sooner than others, it is only for the privilege and purpose of helping the other siblings to get there too.
You have absolutely no friggin' idea how maddeningly egotistical this sounds. By the way, there's a booger in your nose. Which I can look into. Because you are looking down your nose at me.

quote:
Is there any human endeavor that is noble, necessary or worthwhile to you?
There are many that (and should you have READ MY POST you'd have seen this) might be worthwhile, but NONE that are both ultimately necessary and not indicative of a failure of mankind.

quote:
We train to excel at something which is a blessing to others and a joy to us and God. We train to become able to heal and help each other on whatever level of need that is. We train to become strong defenders against enemies of lies and selfishness and false ideas which seek to steal our life and joy and ability to nurture others from us.
See what you're arguing here? You're arguing that the "training" is good BECAUSE IT HAS A POINT. The notion that the training is inherently good is what I take an issue with!

quote:
If you mean insight or knowledge for one’s own sake,
I don't. In fact, I'm not even vaguely sure how the passage you quoted has anything to do with that. Nevermind that you have yet to prove why empathy lies on the side of christianity in this debate. (That goes to all of you.)

quote:
If you mean be enlightened so that we can shed selfish and hurtful behavior and really begin working together as people setting aside all the petty crap, I’m with you. The means aren’t the point of it,
So you're basically confirming [i]WHAT I SAID A REALLY LONG TIME AGO? AGAIN?[/b] Nevermind that this DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS your previous statement:
quote:
We, as the living agents of our Father will be the ones to save ourselves from ourselves because of the resources at our disposal through our connection to the Father and within ourselves as the offspring in the nature of the Father. How can we separate the two? The very nature of being human is to be of the divine family with its capacities as we grow into them. We can’t do it as independent children who have departed from the resources and protection of the Father. We have to learn to work as family.
First, you were saying that the work had inherent good. Now, you're saying that the work has only extrinsic good. This is not an either-or situation. Make up your mind.

quote:
I truly am not trying to [answer the question] in the least.
Then welcome to the pitfalls of my argument posted at the beginning of all of this.

quote:
You despise Christianity for the same sorts of reasons that I despised and rejected the institution at age 16.
Bull. I don't object to the institution, I object to the whole notion. And heck, let's not limit it to christianity either.

quote:
Part of the grand lesson of the ages we are experiencing is how the very same situation which blights our earthly experience is the one which takes and twists the pure lovely truths of Who God is and What God does and seeks to comprehend it apart from the actual relationship with God which gives actual insight.
The "suffering is ultimately good" argument is as retrospective as it is rationalizing and vile. Let me know if you doubt me.

quote:
It seems like you’re dying to find attitudes in me which just aren’t mine, based on belief.
A thought process would be better, but okay.

quote:
There is only God’s good.
Lovely. You still haven't read my first post.

quote:
Slarty, I can’t win. If I more humbly throw in “I believe” and “I think” like my first post did, then TM chides me for stating the obvious.
I don't chide you for "stating the obvious." I chide you for saying nothing.
(Although, I suppose, "believing something" and "saying nothing" are the same.)

quote:
What the pot said. That's not really a Christian or even religious phenomenon. Just what people do, really.
So now you're using arguments of human nature to justify your pessimism?

Or are you saying that there's no thought process behind my ideas? In which case, I'd like to remind you that my key points have been conveniently ignored.

...

And just as an aside, if you need to assign a pronoun to god other than "it," you can use "s/he." But do not use "he." This is not a request.

quote:
-Why you should care-

With the pre-qualifier that God exsists,
This is where I stopped caring.

quote:
The best thing is: IT'S FREE, AND ANYONE CAN HAVE IT RIGHT NOW!
You could say the same about my piss.

quote:
You don't have to work for it. You don't have to change. All you have to do is accept it.
I don't have to change? But what about those precious brain cells I'd have to kill off first before being able to believe in such garbage?

quote:
That example is really incomparable.
I agree. The leek soup actually exists.

quote:
I'm embarrassed for you.
I hate you.

quote:
Again, there is no room for 'if's' or 'could's' here. Either you have or you haven't.
And you clearly have (absolutely no sense of empathy whatsoever, you dried-out, miserable sack of lard and bitterness).

quote:
Ephesos - There is a HUGE difference between 'trying Christianity' and having a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.
Right. One is attempting to find a place in a new religion, and the other is coprophilia.

quote:
I already know what common ground we have. We are both human, imperfect, fallible, mortal.
And so long as this is all that we share, I'm okay.

quote:
With the qualification of God,
With the qualification of my salty, briny, amber urine,

quote:
1. Do you believe there is a God (a perfect supernatural being that created and is ultimately in control of everything in existence)?
No.

quote:
2. If so, do you believe that you have ever violated this God's will in any way, shape, or form?(hint: if you have ever felt guilty, you have)
I feel guilty only when I haven't violated that egomaniacal barbarian's will.

quote:
3. If so, have you made amends with God over all of these violations? (let's not get technical here, let's just say that you believe everything to be all good)
I would sooner punch that maggot in the balls than oblige it with an apology.

quote:
If you answered No to any of these three questions, you are in violation to the will of God and must serve out justice by being punished for eternity.
I would gladly take twelve eternities of torture over bowing down to your Hitler-jesus.

quote:
f you answered Yes to all three questions, there are a few technical requirements that need to be confirmed and/or completed
Such as, "Are you an upper-class caucasian?"

quote:
and you no longer need worry about punishment because someone else volunteered to take it for you.
Right. The third-world slave-labor force.

quote:
This all came from the Bible and should be what every Christian believes.
It's also what the vast majority of insufferable barbarians nowadays believe. Imagine that.

quote:
You have an answer.
Yes. A wrong one.

----

Honestly. I'm getting sick of this crap. This was a minimally-tolerable discussion before the pundits came rolling in. I propose we institute an IQ check before admitting people into these debates simply to keep the fundamentalists out.

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Eep! Christians! (Split from Christian Radio) in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #38
quote:
Right. “Him” is for convenience and out of the usually depicted father role. One could call God “El-Shaddhai,” (the breasted one,) just as correctly. God is all that is male and female and more.
CHAUVINISM IS NOT CONVENIENT; IT IS ALIENATORY. STOP CALLING YOUR DEITY MALE IMMEDIATELY OR NEXT TIME I WILL NOT GRATIFY YOU WITH A RESPONSE.

quote:
God does say, “My thoughts are higher than your thoughts, and my ways are higher than your ways.”
See, here's a problem I've had with archetypal thought from the get-go. All of the truths that are supposedly meta-physical (the mere notion of which I am against on a fundamental basis) can and must be proven in the realm of the physical, or else you open the door to Plato or Leibniz or any number of nonsensical notions.

Furthermore, that I offered a proof of empathy from an atheist perspective and yet you insist that empathy comes from your god only proves how further-distanced your notion of empathy is from the humans who practice it.

quote:
God is Source/Father/Creator, so yes, a “higher force.”
GOD IS NOT A FATHER.

And so you admit to contradicting yourself (and subsequently falling into the harms of my initial tirade). Okay.

quote:
God’s the only force, and we have force by virtue of our having come out of Him, yet also remaining a part of Him. Don’t ask me to explain the paradox
I wasn't going to ask you to explain it.

quote:
but we have the earthly genetic/family experience to give us a conception of it. God is a family, not a caste-system. Honor and privilege come with maturity and demonstration of ability.
1. I still don't know what "privelege" (which I believe you previously called "authority") is.
2. So what if god is a family? You're still implying that god is a parent figure that is above us. No, nevermind- you already admitted to that much.

quote:
Fighting people is in your thinking. I was picturing a weight-lifter.
Har-de-har. If you wanted to describe weight-lifting, Mr. Derrida, you could have chosen a great deal of less vague methods to do so.

quote:
But the reality is that there is something in the spiritual realm which opposes life and truth, and we are to grow up and overcome it by virtue of wrestling with it and recognizing it and rejecting it until we do.
I was going to make a point that this is promoting individual achievement as the ultimate achievement, which devalues people coming together.

Then, I was going to say that the way that you describe this is alienatory towards the wrong-doers and cannot help but fuel division.

After that, I deigned to tackle it from the position of using mythological rhetoric whose only bi-product is hate and ignorance.

But at long last, I decided that my time would best be spent in declaring this metaphysical bullocks and being done with it.

quote:
The “gauntlet” is training.
Wow! Thanks for telling me the definition of the words I use. Greatly appreciated.

quote:
I’d call it something more like learn to “choose the right way in wisdom” (rather than in naiveté,) “learn some self-discipline,” and “learn why love is the law.”
And why does this have to be "training?" It's as if all of your rhetoric exists to draw unspoken conclusions that all of this is personal, isolated and ultimately serves to bolster the self, and cannot be achieved easily. You are defeatist and alienatory; I'll take your points seriously when you can say "when people know the truth" and be done with it.

quote:
You gotta train to win the medal, save lives as a doctor, fight in the army. Training shows us approved and stronger than our opposing forces we encounter in training.
1. Your examples are self-glorification, extreme money-making and dying for abstract causes. Pardon me while I wretch in disgust.
2. I do not know what "training shows us approved" could possibly mean. Approved by god? Approved by ourselves? Or am I merely supposed to fill in the blanks with whatever feels good?

And, I guess, my biggest point that I can draw out:

3. You seem dead-set on the notion that there is inherent good in "finding the way" and that simply being at the end of the "way" is somehow impossible. Your idea of discerning enlightenment is backwards: Obviously, nobody is born with all of life's answers, but the goal is being enlightened, not the means by which we become enlightened. It is good to become more enlightened, but all points at which a person knows less truth are bad because the person knows less truth. So far, all of your ugly and malformed arguments about discernment have existed to support your metaphysical viewpoint of god-as-parent. Not all of existence has to have any meaning greater than the truth inherent in the physicality of existence.

quote:
God is relevant whether we acknowledge it or not, because God continues to do what God wills and His spiritual laws continue to operate.
SPIT ON FIRE. My question this whole bloody freaking time has been "why BELIEVE in a god?" and now you're telling me that it really isn't relevant at all?
AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH

quote:
God becomes consciously relevant to us when we begin to know God for ourselves.
...
You shouldn’t and won’t until you do. God doesn’t put the burden of proof in our hands. He takes the responsibility to open our eyes to His Being.
This is why I absolutely, flat-out hate christianity- its believers set themselves apart on the basis that they have a superior set of experience than non-adherents! Or are you saying that you can "know god" without believing in it? In that case, I DIRECT YOU TO THE FIRST FREAKING POST THAT SET OFF THIS DEBATE.

quote:
We can then become more of an agent of God’s will rather than merely a recipient of God’s will.
So you're saying that we can't do good until we do god's good? Again. FIRST POST.

quote:
Humanity is not my god.
Obviously.

quote:
It is the family of God with the qualities of God in process of being refined and remembered.
I guess atheists are disowned cousins then, hunh?

quote:
You mentioned severing limbs. Re-membering is bringing back to our awareness our connection with God and His nature, as well as the reattaching of that which, at least in our imagination, has been cut off from us.
Based on the nature of your god, I'd much rather remain decapitated.

quote:
Spirit is energy (isn’t everything?), attitude, the wind no one can see but the affects of which can be readily seen and heard. It’s lots of things I don’t understand. One person walking into a room can change its atmosphere with her spirit. A heart caught up in love can be mightily transformed by that spirit.
Way to say absolutely nothing. Bonus points for the emotional porno-show.

quote:
We cut ourselves off by deadening our thinking and developing our own faulty conscience and estimation of “good and evil.”
Which is a particularly back-handed way of saying: "Join God, He who Hath a Penis, Lest Ye be Wrong"

Or in other words- Your whole ideology revolves around the idea that humanity is eternally wrong. Regardless of whether or not this is TRUE, it sets up an attitude of defeatism and grants its believers an insane amount of egoism.

quote:
You would like all things showered upon you as free gifts?
YES. Either I work for 'em or I get 'em for free. In both instances, the same outcome is received- I've got it.

quote:
Many things must be earned by demonstration of our capacity to handle them responsibly.
Read as:
God hasn't given ended disease because then we'd use our good health.

Work will not end- at least, it won't end anytime soon. Regardless, it would be infinitely better if it did. Working does not have any positive value.

quote:
We don’t have dominion over ourselves yet. Ain’t no way we’re going to have dominion over the world outside.
Quoted for metaphysical nonsense.

quote:
God doesn’t punish in the capricious sense.
This is a contradiction- there is no punishment that isn't capricious. Deterrence is almost as bad.

quote:
Again, even literal death need not be a permanent end.
So that's an excuse for this world to suck?

quote:
We’re impatient and unaware of many things out of our sight and knowing.
You're a sheep.

quote:
I mean that loving humanity shows deference, respect, and trust for the Father Who is pleased when his children learn to get along and love each other.
That's what I meant too! When I was criticizing you!

quote:
By describing one of His roles as Father, God tells us something about His desires and drives in that role. We are given earthly fatherhood to demonstrate it for us. Wise fathers don’t demand love from children like tyrants...they foster it and earn it.
This says nothing.

quote:
What makes you think that all of earth’s history and all personal experience hasn’t been contributing exactly what has been appropriate so far for us towards our learning the ways of love and truth?
This is a hollow rationalization.

quote:
Christianity has turned it backwards.
Oh really?

quote:
The obliteration has already taken place when we got the thick notion in our head that we were alienated from God and that we lack somehow.
WHAT? Aren't you the one whose point this whole time was that we're self-centered children?

quote:
Awakening and restoration of spiritual relationship is what we can expect.
I hope not.

quote:
We are living our obliteration, our hells right now. Sucks, don't it?
No more than dealing with this crap.

quote:
Why do you think so many people ARE in torment right here right now? It's not punishment. We did it to ourselves. God is gracious enough to be patiently working to save us from ourselves. It's simply a work not yet complete.
If god has the power, why not use it NOW? Or is it too immature to want problems to be solved? This is defeatist nonsense and rationalizations for a worldview whose ultimate moral is that us getting screwed is somehow "okay." Stop pandering into the status quo!

quote:
Becoming greater means becoming mature and proven enough spiritually to be granted further responsibility and authority to bless people. Nothing becomes more satisfying or rewarding.
This says nothing.

...

Just a question. Are you saying that god hasn't solved the world's problems because we aren't "mature" enough? The problems in the world are what make us (including YOU) "immature" and make us not believe in a god that, should it exist, has clearly abandoned us all!

I'm a bit outraged. Next time you post, let me know if I've been shat upon before I go the whole way through it first.

quote:
In the Christian canon, God surrendered his omnipotence upon the creation of humanity. The entire idea is that God wanted humanity to love God and be happy of its own accord.
So god gives us the capacity to be miserable and die so we can stroke its ego?
PS- GOD IS NOT A MAN. GOD DOES NOT HAVE MALE GENETALIA. GOD DOES NOT HAVE REPRODUCTIVE CELLS, AND EVEN IF IT DID, THERE IS NO INDICATOR AS TO THEIR MOBILITY. THIS APPLIES TO YOU TOO. GOD IS NOT MALE.

quote:
I don't find the rampant parent-child relationship analogies very pertinent, because it vexes parents to no end that immature children have free wills, and they do everything they can to correct that particular vexation.
Heh. I don't know if you're arguing against synergy, but if so, good job.

quote:
As to the real thrust of your point, the assertion that an omnipotent God permitting suffering is morally bankrupt, I will offer a semi-mathematical rebuttal.
And I will offer wholly-mathematical disgust.

quote:
Assuming a metaphysical component to humanity which survives physical existence into eternity, the ratio of physical suffering to whatever happens post-physical-existence is necessarily infintessimal.
Way to rationalize from the get-go.

quote:
Now, that's not a reason to believe, but I think it is a logical way of seeing the situation that at least moves the concept of God above the level of scorn.
So now you too are admitting that you can't answer my original question.

quote:
I hold that the core human impulse behind religion is an innate desire to rationalize an innate desire to be good to one another.
Because, you know, people can't ever just accept something that they feel- physical reality isn't nearly as logical as metaphysical reality, after all.

quote:
People use it to explain fear-inducing natural phenomena, as the contempuous scientists and logicians will have you know, and the chic 'net-liberals on this board would be right to say that many people simply want to be smug in their self-righteousness.
"Contempuous [sic]" scientists and logicians... Always looking for that pesky truth, hunh?

I don't know if wanting to be smug in self-righteousness is the ultimate goal of religion across the board, but I've certainly seen an undeniable proportion of religious people follow religion for just such a reason.

quote:
Still, is it so horrible to believe that we were created so that we might learn to love one another (or "act for the benefit of one another," whichever you prefer) in our time on Earth?
I don't think that's so horrible. I just don't see why religion or a "higher force" is needed for that- that is essentially my problem with religion.

quote:
Furthermore, is it not more just to believe that there will be a time free of suffering when loving like we've learned to will truly make us happy?
I'd like that to be right now, thankyouverymuch. Furthermore, saying that such a time will exist post-mortem is a great justification for slavery, capitalism, genocide, et al.

quote:
(And, conversely, when those without a deep and abiding respect for humanity as a whole will be miserable?)
So your religion wishes misery on people. How pleasant.

quote:
That's why I've come to believe in a Christian God
...hunh? How'd we get from arguing for a benevolent god in general to the christian god?

quote:
despite being a math/science type of guy.
...there is no need to compliment yourself.

quote:
For the universe to be just, the people that live their lives for others and get crap in return need to be rewarded.
So wait- you're rationalizing why the universe is just rather than making it that way?

quote:
What's the difference [between "think" and "believe"]?
Think implies any sort of thought process. You'll have to convince me of that first.

[ Sunday, February 19, 2006 22:47: Message edited by: Thuryl ]

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Eep! Christians! (Split from Christian Radio) in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #28
quote:
Originally written by Ash Lael:

Following Christianity because you think it's true is a more sensible thing to do, I think.
Replace "think" with "believe."
Honestly, none of this has given me any reason to believe, and my reasons not to believe have yet to be countered.

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
All-Nephilim Group in Blades of Avernum
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #25
...sorry, but not really.

I mean, you're in the time of the Empire when non-humans are being massacred. :P

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Mad beginning in Blades of Avernum
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #1
They're fated to be killed.

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
"The End of Blades" Discussion in Blades of Avernum
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #60
This is true. And it was only one game for the programming contest.

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Bandits 2 Bug in Blades of Exile
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #1
Those Rakshasi got their health because your allies are tossing spells at them. Cover the rakshasi in antimagic fields and cut them down to size. (Or just have them run out of SP.) You don't actually have to kill the Rogue Rakshasi- it's just probably a little easier.

"Also, I don't think I understand the plotline. In Corporeus, Karl Gottfried says "the enemy has been waging war on us from Sanctuary. (Katothen's place)" Wasazore implied that his boss was Karl Gottfried. However, he also said that he knows I'm working for Katothen. Wouldn't he, I, and the entire Turkish Division be enemies, then? Or am I wrong?"

Well, both the Turkish Division and Sanctuary are enemies of Deacon. (Plus, Wasazore isn't as crazy as Gottfried.) It's one of those "enemy of my enemy is my enemy too" deal. So yeah, you're enemies, but Deacon is an enemy to basically everyone.

Man. I'm going to have to continue the Echoes series one day.

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Ideas Refreshment in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #6
quote:
Originally written by 7 per day keep the doctor away.:

It's a DeLorean.

Everyone has ideas for how to make a good game. Just look at Blades forums to see how many people would love to design a game as long as someone else will do the implementation for them. Ultimately, nobody really wants to make someone else's world unless that someone is paying for it.

Look at BoE to see how motivated some people will get, to the point where they actually will make their own stuff.

In fact, screw this. To anyone in this thread- get BoE.

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
"The End of Blades" Discussion in Blades of Avernum
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #51
I've got a little different history than Kel's:

quote:
2/19/03 - Louvre by BB established.
3/17/04 - Blades of Avernum is released.
3/18/04 - Comprehensive BOA Scenario Rankings established.
4/3/04 - Beta Call for Roses of Reckoning by TM
4/7/04 - Roses of Reckoning by TM is released. (20 days post-BoA)
4/27/04 - Beta Call for Cave of No Return by Eldiran
5/25/04 - High Level Party Maker by Kelandon is released. (58 days)
5/30/04 - Babysitting by Khoth is released. (63 days)
6/2/04 - Blades of Avernum is released for Windows.
6/18/04 - Cave of No Return by Eldiran is released. (82 days)
8/5/04 - Beta Call for Emerald Mountain by TM
8/9/04 - Beta Call for Xerch'de by Zxquez
8/10/04 - Emerald Mountain by TM is released. (145 days)
8/17/04 - Artifacts Hall by TM is released. (152 days)
8/17/04 - Death at Chapmans by Eric Westra is released. (152 days)
8/22/04 - Beta Call for A Perfect Forest by Stareye (157 days)
9/5/04 - A Perfect Forest by Stareye is released. (171 days)
10/17/04 - Beta Call for Canopy by TM.
12/25/04 - Canopy: Manufactured Womb by TM is released. (282 days)
12/27/04 - Beta Call for Bahssikava by Kelandon.
12/28/04 - Xerch'de by Zxquez is released. (285 days)
2/1/05 - Beta Call for Backwater Calls by Smoo.
2/20/05 - Bahssikava by Kelandon is released. (339 days)
2/28/05 - Backwater Calls by Smoo is released. (347 days)
3/25/05 - Beta Call for The Darkness by Kelandon.
3/29/05 - Lord Putidus by Kelandon is released. (376 days)
4/7/05 - Nine Variations on Point B by Alec is released. (385 days)
4/16/05 - Cresent Valley by Michael Slack is released. (394 days)
5/15/05 - Beta Call for Mad Ambition by TM.
5/24/05 - Undead Valley by Archimagi Micael is released. (432 days)
6/5/05 - Druids of Krell by Ephesos is released. (444 days)
6/6/05 - A Large Rebellion by Otto Halmén is released. (445 days)
6/9/05 - Mad Ambition by TM is released. (448 days)
10/17/05 - Proving Grounds by Michael Slack is released. (578 days)
quote:
Attitudes like these are snobby and unproductive.
What, you think that my perspective is lacking? If so, let's talk facts.

For the BoA contest, we had roughly 15 scenarios entered. Let's be generous and say that we had 20 altogether (including beta-testers') when the contest hit.

For the corresponding time in the BoE contest, we had soooooo many it's not even funny. Blades of Avernum does not have an answer to Amazonian Saga, Tatterdemalion, et cetera, DESPITE BoA's having a larger pool from which to draw designers. And I would be absolutely astonished if BoA had an answer to An Apology or Redemption 1-2 years from now.

We have a better platform with more power and a larger pool of potential designers, many of whom have far more resources than the BoE designers ever did. Regardless of BoA's difficulties, the absence of excellent scenarios signifies a horrific low in designing which cannot be rationalized away.

Action has to be taken. Open-sourcing BoE would be a nice start.

quote:
It's already been superseded in both technical and story terms by Av4
Anyone who dares complement A4 deserves whatever form of death visits such a subhuman animal.

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Let's Go! in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #68
Am I the only one who read that statement in the other euphemistic way?

Like, Brokeback-style?

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Everything you never wanted to know about Christian radio... in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #28
My question to Creator is, how "christian" do people want the station to be, and how do they "enforce" this policy?

[ Sunday, February 19, 2006 15:26: Message edited by: Imban ]

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00
Hooray. in General
BANNED
Member # 4
Profile Homepage #13
quote:
Originally written by Synergy:

Everyone knows a bear's spigot is on the top of its head. My bear has honey in it.
...

Wherever the line is, this post is WAY past it.

--------------------
*
Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00

Pages