Profile for Thuryl

Error message

Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /var/www/pied-piper.ermarian.net/includes/common.inc).

Recent posts

Pages

AuthorRecent posts
My God can beat up your God! in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #45
I think the point TM was making was that Jesus has been so mythologised that it's impossible to take any account of something he said or did at face value. It'd hardly be historically unprecedented for a public figure to be co-opted by someone else; we know, for example, that Plato put words in Socrates' mouth all the time.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
A3 is there still a time limit? in The Avernum Trilogy
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #6
quote:
Originally written by jestrada5:

I have to wait until day 110? If i do the alien beast stuff and win will that time based event still take place?
Day 160, actually.

And the game ends after you win (you can't keep playing), so any quests you want to do, you have to do before you win. Of course, you could always keep a backup savefile outside the final dungeon and go back to it after you've won to see anything you've missed.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Canopy help in Blades of Avernum
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #2
Lichtschild is a good spell to use, if you've found it. Keeping your party invulnerable and blessed all the time is always a good strategy, and especially so when you're surrounded by nasty enemies. It costs a lot of spell points, but there are plenty of energy potions for sale in the scenario so that shouldn't be a problem. (If you're going to rely on being invulnerable, kill Todmacher quickly, since he can negate your invulnerability.)

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Finland > Eurovision! in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #19
quote:
Originally written by Thin Air:

What exactly about Eurovision is Americanised?
Germany. :P

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Native Americans in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #142
If your main motivations for becoming a teacher are short hours and good pay, you've picked the wrong career on both counts.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Avernum V in Avernum 4
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #349
quote:
Originally written by Randomizer:

ncp as in non-character person, you know noobie.
The term you are looking for is "NPC", as in "non-player character".

Fool.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Melee Guardian - G2vsG3 in Geneforge Series
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #7
quote:
Originally written by Major:

You don't have to say it twice. :P
Yes, it is alot harder in geneforge 3, but not enough to change my tactics. D4 to D8, that is half.

A d4 actually does a bit more than half the average damage of a d8; the average of 1d4 is 2.5, while the average of 1d8 is 4.5.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Return to the Vale in Blades of Avernum
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #2
There aren't any yet, but you could always make one.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Finland > Eurovision! in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #16
quote:
Originally written by Ash Lael:

Watched it last night. I have to give the Finland band props for having fun and not taking themselves too seriously. But really, for all the fierce looking make-up, that barely deserved to be called "hard rock" at all. I was expecting some blistering metal.
The rules of the contest require every entry to be a pop song. The definition of "pop song" can be stretched a little, but not as far as heavy metal. :P

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
The Big Club Theory in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #81
We really need to make the 1-star rating something more unflattering, like "Cave Slime".

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
The Ultimate Survey in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #45
quote:
Originally written by Jewels:

Have you ever kissed someone and regretted it?
—Chris is the only one I've ever kissed that wasn't a relative.

Objection: nonresponsive.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Native Americans in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #134
I love the way other people are picking up my use of the word "dude" to express mild condescension. :P

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Finland > Eurovision! in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #8
The voting really is the best part of it. When I was a small child I used to stay up until midnight just to watch all the voting.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Finland > Eurovision! in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #6
Dude, the Eurovision Song Contest has been around since 1956. Get an education.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
The Big Club Theory in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #68
quote:
Originally written by Major:

quote:
How do you justify things that are tested and found to be older than the Earth, then? What about fossils?

Yes,I know I still can't figure out how DNA managed to be still there after billions of years.

Just to clarify, whether fossils still have DNA in them is irrelevant; DNA isn't needed in order to test the age of a rock.

(Incidentally, your apparent ignorance of basic facts about how rocks are dated bodes ill for the possibility of a constructive discussion with you. I don't blame you for not knowing much about genetics, since the fine details of genetics are rarely fleshed out in publications aimed at the lay reader, but radioisotope dating is something you can learn about in any good popular science book about geology.)

[ Saturday, May 20, 2006 18:06: Message edited by: Thuryl ]

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
The Ultimate Survey in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #30
quote:
Originally written by Mc 'mini' Thralni:

Favorite chocolate bar?
—Twix

I will forevermore picture you as George Costanza.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
The Big Club Theory in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #55
quote:
Originally written by Kelandon:

For the record, archeological dating goes well beyond C-14 dating. If it were just C-14 dating, I wouldn't believe the dates either, because C-14 dating, by itself, is crappy on small time scales. It's good for millions of years, but it sucks for just a couple thousand years.
Actually, it's the other way around; carbon dating is only useful for objects going back from a few thousand years to a few tens of thousands of years, because if something's been dead longer than that, the carbon-14 has decayed to the point that accurately measurable quantities are no longer present. Different radioisotope dating methods, like potassium-argon dating, are used for geological time scales.

[ Friday, May 19, 2006 22:23: Message edited by: Thuryl ]

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
The Ultimate Survey in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #21
quote:
Originally written by Robinator, #034:

Hottest sw male
—I don't even know who's here anymore. Dikyoba, because he talks about himself in the third person. What does he look like again?

Dikiyoba's a woman, you clod.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
The Big Club Theory in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #50
quote:
Where did this number range come from?

Counting the lifetimes of the generations from Adam to the modern times gives you about 6000 years. So how do you come up with the 8,000-15,000 number?
Presumably because he doesn't quite have the balls to deny that the ancient Egyptians existed.

[ Friday, May 19, 2006 15:35: Message edited by: Thuryl ]

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Cheats in Avernum 4
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #7
quote:
Originally written by The Lurker:

The Lurker still keeps getting 69ned.
I certainly hope that you mean "86ed".

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Avernum 3 : is killing Rentar-Ihrno... in The Avernum Trilogy
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #4
Make sure you've set all the beams correctly (there are ten of them), or you'll keep getting teleported back indefinitely.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Native Americans in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #128
quote:
"The Executive Committee of the Division of Psychologists Interested in Religious Issues supports the conclusion that, at this time, there is no consensus that sufficient psychological research exists to scientifically equate undue non-physical persuasion (otherwise known as "coercive persuasion", "mind control", or "brainwashing") with techniques of influence as typically practiced by one or more religious groups. Further, the Executive Committee invites those with research on this topic to submit proposals to present their work at Divisional programs." (PIRI Executive Committee Adopts Position on Non-Physical Persuasion Winter, 1991, in Amitrano and Di Marzio, 2001)
I bolded the relevant part. That passage is specifically about whether modern religious groups conduct brainwashing, not about whether brainwashing exists, so it has nothing to do with this discussion.

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
Avernum V in Avernum 4
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #336
quote:
Originally written by Mr.Bookworm:

There's really no point to that unless something is causing the cave-quakes. You'd just wander around. You literally have to have a main bad guy. It gives the story focus.
Bull. Edmund Hillary's ascent of Mount Everest doesn't have any villains in it, but it still makes for a riveting story.

[ Friday, May 19, 2006 06:43: Message edited by: Thuryl ]

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
The Big Club Theory in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #43
quote:
Originally written by Josty:

To phrase Thuryl's point in an economic way: most species do not live in a world of 'perfect competition', where each individual animal is just able to survive. Rather, there tends to be (a bit) of abundance (of food, shelter, etc.) implying that not only the strongest animals survive, but also the somewhat weaker. This would be survival of the fitter, not just the fittest.

This implies that a first genetic change that makes an animal slightly less efficient (in terms of speed, weight, food processing, etc.) does not immediately leads to death. This facilitates evolutionary alterations that need multiple steps before being beneficial to a species.

More to the point, an individual that has one marginally harmful genetic mutation isn't necessarily less fit overall than an average member of its species. Apart from that, though, most mutations which are conserved through evolution aren't harmful, at least in the ecological niche which the organism possessing them inhabits.

quote:
To Kelandon: a difference between linguistic and biological evolution is the relative importance of network effects in linguistic evolution. If a subgroup of the population makes some changes to its language, the other members may not understand the `new' part of the language. If I decide that from now on I will call a chair `stoel', then that only works if you understand what I mean by `stoel'. This may be less important in biological evolution.
I suppose if you were in a mood for drawing analogies you could say that mating behaviour requires that sort of effect -- if other members of your species don't recognise your mating ritual due to a mutation that changes your mating behaviours, you're not going to have very much reproductive success. (Changes in mating behaviour therefore tend to be closely associated with speciation events.)

quote:
Originally posted by Major:
First, (Dintiradan hit this point) macro evolution is the adding of genes. This is what I disagree with.
Second, micro evolution is the changing of genes. I agree with this.
Third, mutations just take away genes. This, I agree with too.

Mutations don't just alter or delete genes; they can also duplicate genes. And once a gene has been duplicated, the duplicated copy is free to evolve and maybe eventually serve some purpose entirely different from the original gene without harming the organism, since the original copy is still able to serve the gene's original function. Gene duplication is an incredibly important process in evolution.

Here's something you may find surprising: a human has hardly any genes that a dog, an insect or even a plant doesn't also have. That's such an important point that I think it deserves its own paragraph.

The exact DNA sequence of an organism's genes, and the number of copies of each of them, are different across species, but the basic gene families are all the same. It's estimated that only about 1000 entirely new genes have evolved over the entire course of a few billion years of biological evolution, and most of those evolved in bacteria -- every other gene has arisen from duplication and other mutations of a previously existing gene.

In other words, you can get from fruit fly to human without adding a single gene, just by duplicating, deleting or otherwise modifying genes that already exist.

[ Friday, May 19, 2006 06:48: Message edited by: Thuryl ]

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00
The Big Club Theory in General
...b10010b...
Member # 869
Profile Homepage #40
quote:
Originally written by Dintiradan:

In real life, our flies aren't being bred in a lab; they're struggling to survive. Even the slightest detriment to an organism will cause its type to die out over the thousands of years that evolution proposes as its timeframe.
What you say seems true from a naive analysis, but in practice isn't really the case. Remember, "fitness" isn't something inherent to an organism; it's a function of the interaction between an organism and its environment. Since environments (and therefore available ecological niches) change over time, so does the optimal genetic makeup of the organisms within them.

If it were in fact the case that tiny imperfections always or usually caused organisms to die out, we wouldn't expect to observe a large amount of genetic variation within natural populations. Given that we do observe such variation, we may reasonably conclude that most natural populations exist in a nonequilibrium state with some degree of maladaptation to their environment, because environment often changes too fast for genetics to catch up. An organism with a particular genetic mutation may be less adapted to one part of its ecological niche but more adapted to another.

[ Thursday, May 18, 2006 23:20: Message edited by: Thuryl ]

--------------------
The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure!
Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00

Pages