Revised political-geneforge sympathies poll

Error message

Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /var/www/pied-piper.ermarian.net/includes/common.inc).

Pages

AuthorTopic: Revised political-geneforge sympathies poll
Shock Trooper
Member # 7143
Profile #100
The BlackRabbit thing does not really indicate corruptness, I suggest that you look the word up in the dictionary as it applies to people before using it again.

--------------------
"After I'm dead I'd rather have people ask why I have no monument than why I have one."
- Cato the Elder (234-149 BC)

"When one fights a monster, one must take care not to become a monster oneself."
-Friedich Nietzche

"One should die proudly when it is no longer possible to live proudly."
-Friedich Nietzche
Posts: 333 | Registered: Saturday, May 20 2006 07:00
Agent
Member # 4574
Profile #101
quote:
Originally written by Retlaw May:

The BlackRabbit thing does not really indicate corruptness, I suggest that you look the word up in the dictionary as it applies to people before using it again.
I am well aware of what the word means. As I explained, I could not think of a better word at the time. Now, go scurry back to your fantasy land were a massive empire of humans spanning two continents with many laws can't be bribed at the local level.

--------------------
"I'm happy I'm the mentally disturbed person I am."
-Nioca
Posts: 1186 | Registered: Friday, June 18 2004 07:00
Guardian
Member # 5360
Profile #102
The non-Shaper part of the empire (Read:Low levels of government) could probably be bribed. The Shapers, however, undergo rigorous psychological conditioning for years before becoming Shapers, and bribery would have to be all but nonexistent in that area. The non-Shaper but Shaper-appointed officials, yes, the Shapers, no.

[ Thursday, November 22, 2007 14:25: Message edited by: Thoughts in Chaos ]

--------------------
May the fires of Undeath burn in your soul, and consume it.
Posts: 1636 | Registered: Wednesday, January 5 2005 08:00
BANNED
Member # 10430
Profile #103
Retlew:
quote:

If you don't remember, you walk into a power struggle including the new generation who almost exclusively hate humans and wish to sever ties. Ghaldring rules by being the strongest, not by asking others what they think, his stances don't matter all that much if he leads the drakons to victory and they don't feel that they are too subservient to his rule.

If Ghaldring ruled simply by being the strongest, then he would have taken Salassar out the back and ripped him a new hole, without all the finagling involving the PC.

But as Ghaldring himself explains:
"Why didn't you kill Salassar yourself?"

"It would not have been wise. Drakons are proud. If they felt I was only ruling by killing those I did not like, then, no matter how much they owed me, they would have brought me down in the end."

So clearly Ghaldring doesn't rule just by 'being the strongest', but by winning the hearts and minds of his fellow Drakons. He needs to take the wishes and feelings of his Drakons into account, or else they will gang up and usurp him. If Ghaldring's views do not reflect the common view of his Drakons, then it only follows that he would be deposed.

Thought of Chaos:
quote:

The Shapers targeted the Drayks for genocide because they were dangerous.

So are the Jews. Haven't you ever noticed how Jews have a habit of ascending to positions of economic and political power? The Kurds in Iraq were dangerous, too. As were the Armenians in Turkey.

quote:

It was a logical conclusion that they would one day slip from Shaper control

Yep, that's a logical conclusion. Independent beings usually don't like being under someone's thumb.

quote:

and, if not rampage around killing the humans that enslaved them, seek to establish their own civilization to eventually challenge Shaper supremacy.

Conjecture. You're assuming that every race is as vile, imperialistic, controlling and violent as the Shapers.

quote:

Perhaps genocide was not the best solution, and Nalyd certainly doesn't think it was, but given the centuries of Shaper conditioning and the good track record of this method, it was a reasonable one.

The policy of genocide doesn't have a good track record, as evidenced by a Rebellion where the serviles, eyebeasts, drayks and drakons are all united. When such disparate races come together despite their differences, that symbolizes how the genocide policy has failed.

Laki:
quote:

The Dracons are as you said forced to be cruel to shapers but are not forced to create uncontrolable powerfull monster(unbound)that will destroy anything that moves.

No, just no. Please, I urge you to replay Geneforge 4. The Drakons engaged in conventional warfare against the Shapers. They were smashed. The human/servile resistance was annihilated. The Drakons retreated to Northforge to create the Unbound while the Shapers advanced. Finally, the Unbound were completed, just as the Shapers reached the Northforge Warrens.

It was either release the Unbound and save the Rebellion, or destroy the Unbound and have the Rebellion quashed, and the remaining humans, serviles, drayks, drakons and eyebeasts (we can't forget the poor baby eyebeasts, can we now?) slaughtered.

Releasing the Unbound was justifiable self defense.

quote:

So I think the moral highground has human/servile part of rebellion

As you so astutely point out, the human/servile part of the Rebellion can afford to have the 'moral highground' because they allow the Drakons to do their dirty work.

Nioca:
quote:

You, my friend, are deluded.

You are friends with deluded individuals? Is that wise?

quote:

The only Drakon that showed mercy and tolerence is Ghaldring,

False. I could dig up quotes from numerous Drakons who, at the very least, are willing to tolerate the company of non-Drakons. But I don't know if I should expend the effort, as I feel that you're not arguing in good faith.

quote:

and his rule, if GF4 shows anything, is already in severe danger.

Hyperbole. His rule was challenged by Salassar, and this challenge turned into a flop.

quote:

The rest would be all to happy to shred you on the spot.


Doubly false. Even Salassar, the most anti-human of the Drakons, isn't interested in carrying out a war of extermination against all humans. He merely wishes to break all ties with them.

quote:

Oh really? Is the shaping lab behind the Drakon's warrens in Khima-uss out of this so-called necessity?

Yes. Can't you see why Drakons need to shape in order to fight a far superior force of Shaping masters? What do you expect the Drakons to use in their fight against the Shapers... sticks and cotton balls?

quote:

Is the fact that they effectively kicked serviles out of Khima-uss

No they didn't. The Drakons took control. Isn't that what military leaders do? They establish a base of operations, and then order those of lower rank about? It's not exactly pleasant, but in warfare these things must occur.

quote:

or made them slave labor
According to that logic, every human in the Shaper army, as well as those who supply and feed said army, are slave labour.

I agree that the Drakons who moved into Khima-Uss didn't exactly go about the acquisition diplomatically, but to condemn them for merely establishing a base of operations during a war, and equating their actions to slave labour, is hyperbole.

quote:

No to the first,

So you agree that the Shapers survival did not depend on their ability to Shape?

quote:

but yes to the second. Most of the developments in shaping came from those experiments.

False. A rare few developments in Shaping came from numerous Shaping experiments, many of which were cruel and unnecessary. Merely because some experiments brought about advancements, does not mean that all (or even the majority) of experiments performed were necessary or relevant.

For example, one particular Nazi experiment involved bleeding prisoners, and observing the process of blood loss leading to death. Today, that experimental material is used by the medical establishment to determine how much blood loss has occured in a patient who has suffered trauma.

According to your rationale, since one Nazi experiment brought about advancements, then the entire slew of experiments served the greater good.

quote:

Twisted? Yes. Pointless? Try again.

Twisted? Yes. Pointless? Yes. Much like how the Nazis used to burn prisoners of war with phosphorus bombs, and then examined the wounds. Why would anyone need to mutate glaahks and thahds? What greater good does that serve?

If the Shapers had been targeted for extermination by a superior military force prior to the emergence of the Rebellion, then I could understand why they needed to experiment on glaahks and thahds. But the Shaper empire had experienced centuries of peace, there was no need to engage in such warped experiments, expect for their perverse desire to gain knowledge.

quote:

Oh, and while we're making vaguely related comparisons between Geneforge and real-life events, the Rebels are the equivalent of modern-day terrorists.

No they aren't. Terrorists delibrately target civilians for political purposes. The Rebels release creations whose role is to kill the Shapers and their allies, but unfortunately cause a lot of collateral damage. A more accurate comparison is with the artillery bombardment employed by first world nations such as the United States and Israel.

quote:

No argument vs. Drayks, but the drakons are bound by neither reason nor mercy (Ghaldring aside).

False. Your blanket statement is so absurd, I don't think it really requires a rebuttal.

quote:

I apologize. I didn't know Salassar was the picture of mental health.
He seems mentally stable to me. Merely because you disagree with his ideology, does not automatically make him insane.

quote:

Except for the backstabbing, brainwashing, and hypocrisy.

Backstabbing, brainwashing and hypocrisy? I have never observed such things in the Drakon resistance.

quote:

It is interesting to see how you can put a much lower value on the deaths of millions

Millions? Your hyperbole generator is acting up again.

quote:

of innocent bystanders

Innocent? Are these the same humans who supply the Shapers, feed them, provide equipment for their cruel Shaping experiments, and happily exploit servile labour while baying for Drayk and Drakon blood? Granted, not all humans are Shapers, but they do resemble the Germans who happily profited under Nazi rule. Don't expect any sympathy from me.

quote:

versus the death of a few hundred who posed a serious threat to security, and possibly the world.

Who posed a serious threat because they were being targeted for extermination.

quote:

Quite frankly, the shapers were clearly correct in assuming that the Drayks were too independent and dangerous to be allowed to exist. Look at the carnage that resulted because they survived!

Quite frankly, the Nazis were clearly correct in assuming that the Jews were too independent and dangerous to be allowed to exist. Look at the carnage that resulted in places such as the Warsaw Ghetto, because the Jews there were allowed to survive!

In case you haven't realized yet, your reasoning in circular.

"Why are we killing the Drayks?"

"Because they dangerous. Just look at how they are attacking us!"

"Why are they attacking us?"

"Because we are killing them."

[ Thursday, November 22, 2007 19:45: Message edited by: Lepus timidus ]

--------------------
"When I was a child, my people talked while others prepared for war. They used reason while others used tanks, and they were destroyed for their trouble! I won't stand by and watch it happen again, I won't!"
Posts: 136 | Registered: Wednesday, September 12 2007 07:00
Infiltrator
Member # 10578
Profile Homepage #104
Whewwww. Holy mackerel, that was long.

I have no inclination to become embroiled in this debate. But why, oh why must you always say "Shaper=Nazi"? Well, if you must. Let's just say that Lepus timidus is a drakon, and accept the fact that he will inevitably disagree with us Shapers.

I remain an unshaken loyalist, yet open-minded as ever. (This is very possible in the world of Geneforge, whether it can coexist with your stereotype or not.)

--------------------
"What direction, what direction now?"
----
My poetry
Posts: 432 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2007 07:00
Agent
Member # 4574
Profile #105
quote:
Originally written by Thoughts in Chaos:

The non-Shaper part of the empire (Read:Low levels of government) could probably be bribed. The Shapers, however, undergo rigorous psychological conditioning for years before becoming Shapers, and bribery would have to be all but nonexistent in that area. The non-Shaper but Shaper-appointed officials, yes, the Shapers, no.
That's right. Because none of the Shapers who took the oath, especially Zakary, Barzahl, and Master Whatshisface (G3), every proved to go against the Shaper ideology. Nope, they were all loyal to the bone and never disobeyed the Council.

--------------------
"I'm happy I'm the mentally disturbed person I am."
-Nioca
Posts: 1186 | Registered: Friday, June 18 2004 07:00
Guardian
Member # 5360
Profile #106
Nalyd will not use the quotes.

Ghaldring does rule by being the strongest. If he ruled by violently being the strongest, then the other Drakons would temporarily unite and rip him apart. As it is, he rules tenuously by working not to offend any other Drakons too badly, by frantic political maneuvering to keep them occupied with each other, appealing to the Drakon sense of "honor" by saying, rightly so, that they owe him for bringin the Rebellion so far, and by creating an object of focus in Salassar. A very tenuous rule indeed.

The types of danger you refer to are different than that which the Drakons pose. Ascending to political and economic power is completely different than being on the verge of waging racial war. And, to be honest, you refer to stereotypes.

Glad you agree.

What would you see them as having done? Making hemp bracelets and drinking tea? No, intelligent beings that were previously enslaved would want revenge, at least on the Shapers. Also, the Shapers are not a race, nor are they all identical. They are a caste, and one that is growing increasingly varied.

That is the first time that that method has failed. The first, in many centuries of Shaper rule. When something becomes uncontrollable, kill it and everything related to it. Granted, when it fails, it fails spectacularly, but the Shapers couldn't know this. Their own emergence from Shaping had long since been buried in millennia of history.

Have you seen the number of Drakons in the Northforge areas? Have you seen the number and quality of Shaper troops around those same areas? Don't say the Drakons didn't have a chance, they had a very considerable one, and no less than they ever had. It was about as justifiable as launching the nukes because you lost a battle. The Drakons were hardly "crushed" in conventional warfare. They barely even fought.

The Drakons have more or less abandoned the human Rebellion the humans have to fend for themselves, and with quite a bit less resources than the Drakons, and seem to be doing quite well surviving.

You know exactly what he meant. Don't be an idiot. Keep the debate impersonal.

Tolerating the company of? KKK members can "tolerate the company of" blacks if they want to. And using them in battle isn't "tolerant".

This was a chance. He could have very well lost his rule if the PC hadn't come along and conveniently forced Salassar's hand.

No, the Drakons wouldn't care at all if all humans died today. They just don't have a reason to expend effort and make more enemies at the moment. If Drakons won? Human slaves. Maybe.

They could use their own two-ton fire-spewing selves. Nalyd doesn't accuse them for Shaping, but their is no necessity whatsoever for the Unbound.

But why are the Serviles of lower rank? Because they have less inborn fighting ability? They are more mentally stable? They are less violently radical? They are less bloodthirsty? Why?

Explain the elaborate artwork and sculpture in Khima-Uss. Hardly warfare-applicable, is it.

Not entirely, no, Shaper survival did not depend on their ability to Shape. It certainly didn't hurt, but beyond the first tumultuous war for supremacy, Shaping was not necessary.

Knowledge does not come without a price. If the Nazis had not engaged in such violent research, how many would have died due to lack of knowledge? The only reason that Shaping has not brought about untold benefits is that the research is insanely, horrifically, complicated. More or less like shooting radiation at chicken embryos to try and make them into cows. And most of this research is directed at warfare.

The desire to gain knowledge, perverse? Never. Never. Your prejudice towards happy ignorance is too blatant here. Nalyd will leave you to it, Eloi, and wait with the other Morlocks.

And that makes them better? The U.S. and Israel are hardly tolerable, let alone perfect.

That is, perhaps, overstating the issue, but Drakons, as a whole, are more irrational, prone to anger, greed, violence, and squabbling than humans. Are these desirable traits.

Not insane, but certainly not stable.

Brainwashing, not so much, backstabbing, so much and so blatant as to be natural. Hypocrisy, Nalyd's memory is failing him.

Millions, yes. Graphics take time and space, and the spaces between the zones almost always contain farms.

They posed a threat because they would soon become uncontrollable war machines.

[ Thursday, November 22, 2007 20:45: Message edited by: Thoughts in Chaos ]

--------------------
May the fires of Undeath burn in your soul, and consume it.
Posts: 1636 | Registered: Wednesday, January 5 2005 08:00
Councilor
Member # 6600
Profile Homepage #107
Unfortunately, Nalyd, I can't even tell what you are supposed to be arguing. Break it up into smaller posts or choose to answer only some of the points, but please use quotes so I know what you're talking about.

Dikiyoba.

--------------------
Episode 4: Spiderweb Reloaded
Posts: 4346 | Registered: Friday, December 23 2005 08:00
Shock Trooper
Member # 7143
Profile #108
Uhg, how much I hate responding to long posts, I don't have the stomach for it like nalyd does. Basically I'm just going to say that I feel you (Lepus) are wrong on all counts (some based on actual script and a lot based on what I feel are safe inferences), maybe you should play the game again. Also, you are constantly attacking the Shapers for certain things and congradulating the Drakons for the same things, which is always annoying. I may find the time to respond to your whole post in small incroments over the next while, but it is a busy week for me so that is it for now.

--------------------
"After I'm dead I'd rather have people ask why I have no monument than why I have one."
- Cato the Elder (234-149 BC)

"When one fights a monster, one must take care not to become a monster oneself."
-Friedich Nietzche

"One should die proudly when it is no longer possible to live proudly."
-Friedich Nietzche
Posts: 333 | Registered: Saturday, May 20 2006 07:00
Infiltrator
Member # 10578
Profile Homepage #109
Let us assume this: Lepus timidus is a drakon.

Now it all makes sense. :P

Edit: I cringe at blanket statements like the one Retlaw May just made, even though I probably agree in this case... still, a revision would be nice.

[ Sunday, November 25, 2007 18:02: Message edited by: Taliesin ]

--------------------
"What direction, what direction now?"
----
My poetry
Posts: 432 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2007 07:00
Shock Trooper
Member # 7143
Profile #110
I cringe at any post that makes me scroll down to finish it.

--------------------
"After I'm dead I'd rather have people ask why I have no monument than why I have one."
- Cato the Elder (234-149 BC)

"When one fights a monster, one must take care not to become a monster oneself."
-Friedich Nietzche

"One should die proudly when it is no longer possible to live proudly."
-Friedich Nietzche
Posts: 333 | Registered: Saturday, May 20 2006 07:00
BANNED
Member # 10430
Profile #111
No one is forcing you to read my posts, are they now?

--------------------
"When I was a child, my people talked while others prepared for war. They used reason while others used tanks, and they were destroyed for their trouble! I won't stand by and watch it happen again, I won't!"
Posts: 136 | Registered: Wednesday, September 12 2007 07:00
Infiltrator
Member # 10578
Profile Homepage #112
Yes. It's self-inflicted.

--------------------
"What direction, what direction now?"
----
My poetry
Posts: 432 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2007 07:00
Agent
Member # 8030
Profile Homepage #113
I recently viewed this thread...I didn't know a debate could occur concerning Geneforge.

--------------------
Jesus is a pacifist.
Ron Paul for '08!
Posts: 1384 | Registered: Tuesday, February 6 2007 08:00
Guardian
Member # 5360
Profile #114
We have a long, long history of Geneforge debates.

--------------------
May the fires of Undeath burn in your soul, and consume it.
Posts: 1636 | Registered: Wednesday, January 5 2005 08:00
Shock Trooper
Member # 7143
Profile #115
Actually it is a short history just in massive amounts of repetition.

--------------------
"After I'm dead I'd rather have people ask why I have no monument than why I have one."
- Cato the Elder (234-149 BC)

"When one fights a monster, one must take care not to become a monster oneself."
-Friedich Nietzche

"One should die proudly when it is no longer possible to live proudly."
-Friedich Nietzche
Posts: 333 | Registered: Saturday, May 20 2006 07:00
Guardian
Member # 5360
Profile #116
What do you think most history is?

--------------------
May the fires of Undeath burn in your soul, and consume it.
Posts: 1636 | Registered: Wednesday, January 5 2005 08:00
Shock Trooper
Member # 9906
Profile Homepage #117
quote:
What do you think most history is?
Not true, name 3 other times something like 9/11 happened? As for translation of Nayld:
quote:

quote:
If Ghaldring ruled simply by being the strongest, then he would have taken Salassar out the back and ripped him a new hole, without all the finagling involving the PC.

But as Ghaldring himself explains:

"Why didn't you kill Salassar yourself?"

"It would not have been wise. Drakons are proud. If they felt I was only ruling by killing those I did not like, then, no matter how much they owed me, they would have brought me down in the end."

So clearly Ghaldring doesn't rule just by 'being the strongest', but by winning the hearts and minds of his fellow Drakons. He needs to take the wishes and feelings of his Drakons into account, or else they will gang up and usurp him. If Ghaldring's views do not reflect the common view of his Drakons, then it only follows that he would be deposed.
Ghaldring does rule by being the strongest. If he ruled by violently being the strongest, then the other Drakons would temporarily unite and rip him apart. As it is, he rules tenuously by working not to offend any other Drakons too badly, by frantic political maneuvering to keep them occupied with each other, appealing to the Drakon sense of "honor" by saying, rightly so, that they owe him for bringin the Rebellion so far, and by creating an object of focus in Salassar. A very tenuous rule indeed.

quote:
So are the Jews. Haven't you ever noticed how Jews have a habit of ascending to positions of economic and political power? The Kurds in Iraq were dangerous, too. As were the Armenians in Turkey.
The types of danger you refer to are different than that which the Drakons pose. Ascending to political and economic power is completely different than being on the verge of waging racial war. And, to be honest, you refer to stereotypes.

quote:
Yep, that's a logical conclusion. Independent beings usually don't like being under someone's thumb.

Glad you agree.

quote:
Conjecture. You're assuming that every race is as vile, imperialistic, controlling and violent as the Shapers.
Perhaps genocide was not the best solution, and Nalyd certainly doesn't think it was, but given the centuries of Shaper conditioning and the good track record of this method, it was a reasonable one.

The policy of genocide doesn't have a good track record, as evidenced by a Rebellion where the serviles, eyebeasts, drayks and drakons are all united.
What would you see them as having done? Making hemp bracelets and drinking tea? No, intelligent beings that were previously enslaved would want revenge, at least on the Shapers. Also, the Shapers are not a race, nor are they all identical. They are a caste, and one that is growing increasingly varied.

quote:
When such disparate races come together despite their differences, that symbolizes how the genocide policy has failed.
That is the first time that that method has failed. The first, in many centuries of Shaper rule. When something becomes uncontrollable, kill it and everything related to it. Granted, when it fails, it fails spectacularly, but the Shapers couldn't know this. Their own emergence from Shaping had long since been buried in millennia of history.

quote:
No, just no. Please, I urge you to replay Geneforge 4. The Drakons engaged in conventional warfare against the Shapers. They were smashed. The human/servile resistance was annihilated. The Drakons retreated to Northforge to create the Unbound while the Shapers advanced. Finally, the Unbound were completed, just as the Shapers reached the Northforge Warrens.

It was either release the Unbound and save the Rebellion, or destroy the Unbound and have the Rebellion quashed, and the remaining humans, serviles, drayks, drakons and eyebeasts (we can't forget the poor baby eyebeasts, can we now?) slaughtered.

Releasing the Unbound was justifiable self defense.

Have you seen the number of Drakons in the Northforge areas? Have you seen the number and quality of Shaper troops around those same areas? Don't say the Drakons didn't have a chance, they had a very considerable one, and no less than they ever had. It was about as justifiable as launching the nukes because you lost a battle. The Drakons were hardly "crushed" in conventional warfare. They barely even fought.

quote:
As you so astutely point out, the human/servile part of the Rebellion can afford to have the 'moral highground' because they allow the Drakons to do their dirty work.
The Drakons have more or less abandoned the human Rebellion the humans have to fend for themselves, and with quite a bit less resources than the Drakons, and seem to be doing quite well surviving.

quote:
You are friends with deluded individuals? Is that wise?
You know exactly what he meant. Don't be an idiot. Keep the debate impersonal.
quote:
False. I could dig up quotes from numerous Drakons who, at the very least, are willing to tolerate the company of non-Drakons. But I don't know if I should expend the effort, as I feel that you're not arguing in good faith.

Tolerating the company of? KKK members can "tolerate the company of" blacks if they want to. And using them in battle isn't "tolerant".

quote:

This was a chance. He could have very well lost his rule if the PC hadn't come along and conveniently forced Salassar's hand.

No, the Drakons wouldn't care at all if all humans died today. They just don't have a reason to expend effort and make more enemies at the moment. If Drakons won? Human slaves. Maybe.

quote:
Yes. Can't you see why Drakons need to shape in order to fight a far superior force of Shaping masters? What do you expect the Drakons to use in their fight against the Shapers... sticks and cotton balls?

They could use their own two-ton fire-spewing selves. Nalyd doesn't accuse them for Shaping, but their is no necessity whatsoever for the Unbound.

quote:
No they didn't. The Drakons took control. Isn't that what military leaders do? They establish a base of operations, and then order those of lower rank about? It's not exactly pleasant, but in warfare these things must occur.

But why are the Serviles of lower rank? Because they have less inborn fighting ability? They are more mentally stable? They are less violently radical? They are less bloodthirsty? Why?

quote:
According to that logic, every human in the Shaper army, as well as those who supply and feed said army, are slave labour.

I agree that the Drakons who moved into Khima-Uss didn't exactly go about the acquisition diplomatically, but to condemn them for merely establishing a base of operations during a war, and equating their actions to slave labour, is hyperbole.
Explain the elaborate artwork and sculpture in Khima-Uss. Hardly warfare-applicable, is it.

quote:
So you agree that the Shapers survival did not depend on their ability to Shape?

Not entirely, no, Shaper survival did not depend on their ability to Shape. It certainly didn't hurt, but beyond the first tumultuous war for supremacy, Shaping was not necessary.

quote:
False. A rare few developments in Shaping came from numerous Shaping experiments, many of which were cruel and unnecessary. Merely because some experiments brought about advancements, does not mean that all (or even the majority) of experiments performed were necessary or relevant.

For example, one particular Nazi experiment involved bleeding prisoners, and observing the process of blood loss leading to death. Today, that experimental material is used by the medical establishment to determine how much blood loss has occured in a patient who has suffered trauma.

According to your rationale, since one Nazi experiment brought about advancements, then the entire slew of experiments served the greater good.
Knowledge does not come without a price. If the Nazis had not engaged in such violent research, how many would have died due to lack of knowledge? The only reason that Shaping has not brought about untold benefits is that the research is insanely, horrifically, complicated. More or less like shooting radiation at chicken embryos to try and make them into cows. And most of this research is directed at warfare.


The desire to gain knowledge, perverse? Never. Never. Your prejudice towards happy ignorance is too blatant here. Nalyd will leave you to it, Eloi, and wait with the other Morlocks.

quote:
No they aren't. Terrorists delibrately target civilians for political purposes. The Rebels release creations whose role is to kill the Shapers and their allies, but unfortunately cause a lot of collateral damage. A more accurate comparison is with the artillery bombardment employed by first world nations such as the United States and Israel.

And that makes them better? The U.S. and Israel are hardly tolerable, let alone perfect.

quote:
He seems mentally stable to me. Merely because you disagree with his ideology, does not automatically make him insane.

That is, perhaps, overstating the issue, but Drakons, as a whole, are more irrational, prone to anger, greed, violence, and squabbling than humans. Are these desirable traits.

quote:
He seems mentally stable to me. Merely because you disagree with his ideology, does not automatically make him insane.

Not insane, but certainly not stable.

quote:
Backstabbing, brainwashing and hypocrisy? I have never observed such things in the Drakon resistance.

Brainwashing, not so much, backstabbing, so much and so blatant as to be natural. Hypocrisy, Nalyd's memory is failing him.

quote:
Millions? Your hyperbole generator is acting up again.
Millions, yes. Graphics take time and space, and the spaces between the zones almost always contain farms.

They posed a threat because they would soon become uncontrollable war machines.

quote:
Quite frankly, the Nazis were clearly correct in assuming that the Jews were too independent and dangerous to be allowed to exist. Look at the carnage that resulted in places such as the Warsaw Ghetto, because the Jews there were allowed to survive! So are the Jews. Haven't you ever noticed how Jews have a habit of ascending to positions of economic and political power? The Kurds in Iraq were dangerous, too. As were the Armenians in Turkey.
Ooh, a pseudo race of poor people. Threatening. Ooh, a two-ton tower of fiery muscle and armor, hungry for revenge. Threatening. Very comparable.

This adding of quotes took awhile so be happy, and Nayld, I hope I got the quotes that you where talking about.

[ Tuesday, November 27, 2007 14:10: Message edited by: SlaughteringSevile ]

--------------------
Life's important Questions:
What is the best Artifact
Gloves of Savagery
Is there a more uber sword that the Puresteel Soulblade: No
Vie va la Travokites
Vie va la Kyryk
Vie va la Serviles
Vie va la Drayks
Your incompidence is your own fault
Before you complain, ask yourself, does anyone care? The answer, of course is No.
My life for Auir!
Posts: 301 | Registered: Tuesday, August 21 2007 07:00
Shock Trooper
Member # 7143
Profile #118
Terrorist attacks happen all the time, we are the general American public just isn't used to them.

--------------------
"After I'm dead I'd rather have people ask why I have no monument than why I have one."
- Cato the Elder (234-149 BC)

"When one fights a monster, one must take care not to become a monster oneself."
-Friedich Nietzche

"One should die proudly when it is no longer possible to live proudly."
-Friedich Nietzche
Posts: 333 | Registered: Saturday, May 20 2006 07:00
Shaper
Member # 7472
Profile Homepage #119
Nayld said most of what I wanted to say, but there's a few points I want to take up myself.

quote:
Originally written by Lepus timidus:

Laki:
quote:

The Dracons are as you said forced to be cruel to shapers but are not forced to create uncontrolable powerfull monster(unbound)that will destroy anything that moves.

No, just no. Please, I urge you to replay Geneforge 4. The Drakons engaged in conventional warfare against the Shapers. They were smashed. The human/servile resistance was annihilated. The Drakons retreated to Northforge to create the Unbound while the Shapers advanced. Finally, the Unbound were completed, just as the Shapers reached the Northforge Warrens.

It was either release the Unbound and save the Rebellion, or destroy the Unbound and have the Rebellion quashed, and the remaining humans, serviles, drayks, drakons and eyebeasts (we can't forget the poor baby eyebeasts, can we now?) slaughtered.

Releasing the Unbound was justifiable self defense.

No, justifiable self-defense would have been to get their own green-or-red butts out on the frontlines and start fighting. Maybe employ actual tactics, rather than kill anything that isn't aligned with them. Rather, they just sit back and expect everyone and everything else to fight for them. Even the most creation-hating Shaper fights alongside their creations.

quote:
quote:

So I think the moral highground has human/servile part of rebellion

As you so astutely point out, the human/servile part of the Rebellion can afford to have the 'moral highground' because they allow the Drakons to do their dirty work.

Oh no, quite the opposite. The Drakons are sitting back and letting the humans and serviles die off while they prepare the ultimate doomsday weapon.

quote:
quote:

The only Drakon that showed mercy and tolerence is Ghaldring,

False. I could dig up quotes from numerous Drakons who, at the very least, are willing to tolerate the company of non-Drakons. But I don't know if I should expend the effort, as I feel that you're not arguing in good faith.

There's a difference between following orders and being tolerant. Those Drakons that you claim to be tolerant are merely following Ghaldring's orders.

quote:
quote:

The rest would be all to happy to shred you on the spot.


Doubly false. Even Salassar, the most anti-human of the Drakons, isn't interested in carrying out a war of extermination against all humans. He merely wishes to break all ties with them.

I'm sorry, did you fail to see the Drakon at the front gate of their frontline fort who incited you to fight her so she could try to kill you? Or that Salassar tried to kill you in the hour you'd been at their frontline fort, and even persuaded another Drakon and several Drayks to do it?

quote:
quote:

No to the first,

So you agree that the Shapers survival did not depend on their ability to Shape?

Yes.

quote:
quote:

but yes to the second. Most of the developments in shaping came from those experiments.

False. A rare few developments in Shaping came from numerous Shaping experiments, many of which were cruel and unnecessary. Merely because some experiments brought about advancements, does not mean that all (or even the majority) of experiments performed were necessary or relevant.

For example, one particular Nazi experiment involved bleeding prisoners, and observing the process of blood loss leading to death. Today, that experimental material is used by the medical establishment to determine how much blood loss has occured in a patient who has suffered trauma.

According to your rationale, since one Nazi experiment brought about advancements, then the entire slew of experiments served the greater good.

I'm sorry, but do you think that all of the knowledge the Shapers gathered over the centuries dropped out of thin air? Your whole argument here is laughable, simply because common sense and evidence given throughout the games state otherwise.

The Nazis' experiments were both twisted and had no real point in mind. The Shapers, though, actually do have a point.

As for the experiment success, I'd say that a whole lot more than just one experiment succeeded here. The Shapers wouldn't have stayed on top for nearly as long if they hadn't.

quote:
quote:

Twisted? Yes. Pointless? Try again.

Twisted? Yes. Pointless? Yes. Much like how the Nazis used to burn prisoners of war with phosphorus bombs, and then examined the wounds. Why would anyone need to mutate glaahks and thahds? What greater good does that serve?

See my argument above. As for why, they're working for a better glaahk/thahd. So it does have a point.

quote:
quote:

Oh, and while we're making vaguely related comparisons between Geneforge and real-life events, the Rebels are the equivalent of modern-day terrorists.

No they aren't. Terrorists delibrately target civilians for political purposes. The Rebels release creations whose role is to kill the Shapers and their allies, but unfortunately cause a lot of collateral damage. A more accurate comparison is with the artillery bombardment employed by first world nations such as the United States and Israel.

That was the whole point! I was pointing out how stupid it is to make vaguely-related, baseless comparisons between real-life and the game!

quote:
quote:

No argument vs. Drayks, but the drakons are bound by neither reason nor mercy (Ghaldring aside).

False. Your blanket statement is so absurd, I don't think it really requires a rebuttal.

Show me where it's wrong. Go ahead. Or is it that I've just hit upon something you can't turn aside?

With Drakons, you either obey or die. End of story.

quote:
quote:

I apologize. I didn't know Salassar was the picture of mental health.
He seems mentally stable to me. Merely because you disagree with his ideology, does not automatically make him insane.

If I've stated it once, I've stated it several times: mentally unstable does not equal insane.

And need I remind you that he committed suicide when he started losing?

quote:
quote:

Except for the backstabbing, brainwashing, and hypocrisy.

Backstabbing, brainwashing and hypocrisy? I have never observed such things in the Drakon resistance.

Examples of each are in order, then.

Backstabbing - Salassar goes behind Ghaldring's back and attempts to have you assassinated.

Brainwashing - The Drakons have brainwashed their followers, particularly the Serviles, that they're fighting for their freedom.

Hypocrisy - The Drakons claim to be better than the Shapers, but turn around and use the Shapers' methods (by this, I mean shaping labs. And does anyone else remember that poor Drayk in GF2 that the Drakons experimented on?) when no one is looking.

quote:
quote:

of innocent bystanders

Innocent? Are these the same humans who supply the Shapers, feed them, provide equipment for their cruel Shaping experiments, and happily exploit servile labour while baying for Drayk and Drakon blood? Granted, not all humans are Shapers, but they do resemble the Germans who happily profited under Nazi rule. Don't expect any sympathy from me.

I apologize; Apparently, empathy is something you consider beneath you. Let's try a simple scenario to see: If someone makes a loaf of bread that feeds a starving person that would have died without it and has never been seen, heard, or contacted in anyway by the person who made the loaf, and said person then went and massacred a dozen people, would the person who made the loaf be responsible?

--------------------
Scenarios need reviews! Please rate these scenarios at the CSR after playing them!
AmnesiaEl PresidenteWhere the Rivers MeetA Visit to the Madhouse
AvatarAphobiaIMAGINE THIS SCENARIO
Posts: 2686 | Registered: Friday, September 8 2006 07:00
Shock Trooper
Member # 9906
Profile Homepage #120
quote:
quote:
quote:
No argument vs. Drayks, but the drakons are bound by neither reason nor mercy (Ghaldring aside).
False. Your blanket statement is so absurd, I don't think it really requires a rebuttal.
Show me where it's wrong. Go ahead. Or is it that I've just hit upon something you can't turn aside?
You nailed him, id like to see him respond

quote:

quote:
Innocent? Are these the same humans who supply the Shapers, feed them, provide equipment for their cruel Shaping experiments, and happily exploit servile labour while baying for Drayk and Drakon blood? Granted, not all humans are Shapers, but they do resemble the Germans who happily profited under Nazi rule. Don't expect any sympathy from me.
I apologize; Apparently, empathy is something you consider beneath you. Let's try a simple scenario to see: If someone makes a loaf of bread that feeds a starving person that would have died without it and has never been seen, heard, or contacted in anyway by the person who made the loaf, and said person then went and massacred a dozen people, would the person who made the loaf be responsible?
Exactly if a person is forced to do something by a person who is forced to do something and on and on, it ends up only the shaper council that is causing trouble

[ Sunday, December 02, 2007 14:15: Message edited by: SlaughteringSevile ]

--------------------
Life's important Questions:
What is the best Artifact
Gloves of Savagery
Is there a more uber sword that the Puresteel Soulblade: No
Vie va la Travokites
Vie va la Kyryk
Vie va la Serviles
Vie va la Drayks
Your incompidence is your own fault
Before you complain, ask yourself, does anyone care? The answer, of course is No.
My life for Auir!
Posts: 301 | Registered: Tuesday, August 21 2007 07:00
Guardian
Member # 5360
Profile #121
Thank you, SS. Nalyd will try to include quotes in the future.

--------------------
Fear us, mortals, but never envy, for though we burn with power, our fuel is our sorrows.
Posts: 1636 | Registered: Wednesday, January 5 2005 08:00
Shock Trooper
Member # 9906
Profile Homepage #122
No problemo

--------------------
Life's important Questions:
What is the best Artifact
Gloves of Savagery
Is there a more uber sword that the Puresteel Soulblade: No
Vie va la Travokites
Vie va la Kyryk
Vie va la Serviles
Vie va la Drayks
Your incompidence is your own fault
Before you complain, ask yourself, does anyone care? The answer, of course is No.
My life for Auir!
Posts: 301 | Registered: Tuesday, August 21 2007 07:00
BANNED
Member # 10430
Profile #123
SlaughteringSevile, thanks for reformatting that post. I didn't have the patience to respond to a post which was illegible. I also don't have the patience for petty posturing or addressing arguments which have been repeated ad nauseum.

quote:

Ghaldring does rule by being the strongest.

I never denied that Ghaldring's strength does not play a role in his rule. What I did contest was Retlew's claim that Ghaldring's rule did not involve taking into consideration the thoughts of his Drakon comrades. In case everyone has forgotten: "Ghaldring rules by being the strongest, not by asking others what they think," Yet clearly Ghaldring retains his rule in part due to his taking into consideration the thoughts and opinions of the other Drakons. He didn't obtain popular support amongst the Drakons by bullying them . Quite the contrary, he garners their respect via diplomacy.

quote:

The types of danger you refer to are different than that which the Drakons pose. Ascending to political and economic power is completely different than being on the verge of waging racial war.

The Drakons aren't on the verge of waging a racial war.

The reason that Drayks and Drakons are targeted for extermination is because they are too independent, and hence believed to represent a potential threat. Such a mentality is identical to that used to exterminate the Kurds, Armenians and Jews.

quote:

And, to be honest, you refer to stereotypes.

I refer to stereotypes in my analogy because the Shaper mentality employs stereotypes to justify their genocide. The Drayks are a potential threat because they are too powerful and independent. The Jews are a potential threat because they are too educated and industrious. I could push the analogy even further, and claim that since humans in the Geneforge universe are capable of learning how to shape vicious monsters and hurl essence lances, they are too dangerous for the drayks, serviles and drakons to let live.

Why is it fine and dandy for humans to target the drayks and Drakons for extermination because they are a 'potential threat', but not for the serviles, drayks or Drakons to target the human race for extermination? Because humans are, well, humanoid?

quote:

No, intelligent beings that were previously enslaved would want revenge, at least on the Shapers.

False. Revenge definitely is on the agenda for some Rebels, although survival and freedom clearly take a higher priority. And many drayks, and even some Drakons, have expressed that they would be willing to live in peace if the Shapers left them alone. For example:

Dryss from the Taker Toll road in GF2:

"That is too bad. Creations should not have to fight to be free. But if they must ...""Yesss. I suppose I would not kill and eat the Shapersss if I could avoid it. I would rather have happy, quiet life, being wealthy and eating meat. But that isss not the life I was created into.";

Issss-Ta, from Zhass-Usss in GF2:

"You don't want the Shapers to be destroyed?" "I do not want it to be necessary. But remember, it was your kind who created us, and then you decided that we should no longer exist. We have to defend ourselves."

quote:

The Drakons were hardly "crushed" in conventional warfare. They barely even fought.

First, I'd like to address the comment that the Drakons 'barely even fought' the Shapers in convential warfare

Quoted from the Rebel ending (which is considered canon) in Geneforge 3:

"From all over Terrestia, we have grim reports. The drakons... the rogues... they are everywhere... We are being slaughtered."

"The Ashen Isles and Poryphra are your base of operations. You fight many battles. You are always victorious. Sometimes your forces fight alone, sometimes they are aided by Ur-Drakons..."

I fail to see how the drakons can be 'everywhere', slaughtering Shapers and assisting human/servile rebel forces, without barely even fighting.

As to the issue of the Drakons taking great losses:

Barstow:
"Tell me about the drakons." "The rebellion has two parts, the humans and the creations. The drakons are the leaders of the creations. Gigantic, majestic, powerful reptile creatures. I've only seen one once, but I will never forget it." "They used to fight often in the war, as I understand it. In the north, I mean. But they took great losses, and now they keep to themselves."

Also note what Alwan has to say about the matter:
"How goes the war?" "That is a very good question. We Shapers are advancing on all fronts. Control of the land, the air, the sea. The rebels have been routed into these northern lands, and our infiltrators harry them at every turn."

And let us not forget the introduction to Geneforge 4:

"And so the rebellion began. It was an alliance of humans tired of Shaper rule, and of intelligent creations who wanted to be free. They rose up, stole some of their master's power, and attacked. At first, the Shapers were caught by surprise. Much of Eastern half of Terrestia was lost... But then the Shapers regrouped, and their armies came. The rebels have been pushed back. Their lands have been burned. Lost refugees, both human and creation, wander the rubble."

Of course, you could continue to argue that the Drakons 'didn't bother' to fight conventional warfare. All this would mean is that when Jeff uses the term 'rebels', he means only the servile/human half of the Rebellion. And the term 'intelligent creations' doesn't refer to Drakons. It would also mean that the serviles and humans managed to conquer the Eastern half of Terrestia without Drakon assistance. And that Barstow is lying. But to be honest, I don't find the above assumptions very tenable.

quote:

The Drakons have more or less abandoned the human Rebellion the humans have to fend for themselves, and with quite a bit less resources than the Drakons, and seem to be doing quite well surviving.

Um, what? The humans have lost the Forsaken Lands, the Southern Geneforge, and Illya Province. A strong Shaper force retook Poryphra and the lands surrounding Derenton Freehold. The human/servile alliance's "Plan B" involves hoping that the Drakons will complete their grand project, and save the Rebellion's ass.

quote:

But why are the Serviles of lower rank? Because they have less inborn fighting ability? They are more mentally stable? They are less violently radical? They are less bloodthirsty? Why?

Because:

1. Ghaldring, a Drakon, is universally acknowledged as the leader of the Rebellion. Even high ranking human rebels, such as Lilita and Greta, defer to him. Hence his edicts are given highest priority. This means that when Ghaldring orders one of his Drakon subordinates to manage a village in the name of the Rebellion, the inhabitants of that village must also obey Ghaldring's subordinates

2. Non-Drakons are of lower rank in regards to the organisation of resistance because Drakons are the most effective soldiers. Once again, this is universally acknowledged by the servile/human resistance.

quote:

Not entirely, no, Shaper survival did not depend on their ability to Shape. It certainly didn't hurt, but beyond the first tumultuous war for supremacy, Shaping was not necessary.

So why do you fail to condemn the Shapers for engaging in cruel Shaping experiments, while moaning and whining about Drakons doing the same thing? Especially given that the Drakons shape out of necessity, whereas the Shapers do not.

quote:

Knowledge does not come without a price. If the Nazis had not engaged in such violent research, how many would have died due to lack of knowledge?

How many people would not have died or suffered if the Nazis hadn't engaged in cruel and unnecessary experiments, such as burning prisoners with phosphorus bombs so that doctors could examine the wounds?

quote:

The only reason that Shaping has not brought about untold benefits is that the research is insanely, horrifically, complicated. More or less like shooting radiation at chicken embryos to try and make them into cows. And most of this research is directed at warfare.
At last you're starting to grasp my point, after we've been going around in circles for God knows how long. As we both agree, the vast majority of Shaper research is directed at warfare. But why? Why is research into a better thahd or glaak necessary during an era of peace? How does such research contribute to the betterment of society?
Such research is unnecessary, horridly cruel and wasteful (the resources expended on this frivolous Shaping could be spent on grain to feed villages suffering famine). Merely because the Shapers occassionally perform useful research does not excuse the vast majority of their other research, which is cruel and unnecessary.

quote:

The desire to gain knowledge, perverse? Never. Never. Your prejudice towards happy ignorance is too blatant here. Nalyd will leave you to it, Eloi, and wait with the other Morlocks.

The desire to gain knowledge purely for knowledge's sake, while inflicting horrendous suffering on sentient beings in the process, is perverse. This isn't just my opinion, it's the unanimous opinion of international and national bodies who helped frame guidelines and laws for ethical scientific research (read the Nuremburg Code, the Helsinki Declaration, or the research ethic guidelines of your nation). In order to fulfil the requirement for ethical conduct of research, researchers must demonstrate that their research isn't frivilous, and it minimizes harm to the participants, whether human or animal.

--------------------
"I am Barzhal, and I am here to ask you a question:
Is a man not entitled to the products of his own essence?

No, says the servile in Medab. It belongs to the oppressed.
No, says the Shaper in Terrestia. It belongs to the Shaper Council.
No, says the Trakovite in hiding. It belongs to no-one.

I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something
different. I chose the impossible. I chose… Ascension."
Posts: 136 | Registered: Wednesday, September 12 2007 07:00
Shaper
Member # 7472
Profile Homepage #124
quote:
Originally written by Lepus timidus:

I also don't have the patience for petty posturing
Pot, meet kettle. And I also enjoy how you used those excuses to ignore each and every one of my arguments entirely. It's interesting to notice how you decided to do this when I started presenting facts that backed up my arguments.

But I digress. It is apparent my arguments fall on deaf ears when it comes to you, and as such, I'll keep my debate to more reasonable members.

--------------------
Scenarios need reviews! Please rate these scenarios at the CSR after playing them!
AmnesiaEl PresidenteWhere the Rivers MeetA Visit to the Madhouse
AvatarAphobiaIMAGINE THIS SCENARIO
Posts: 2686 | Registered: Friday, September 8 2006 07:00

Pages