Profile for Drew
Field | Value |
---|---|
Displayed name | Drew |
Member number | 4233 |
Title | By Committee |
Postcount | 2242 |
Homepage | |
Registered | Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Recent posts
Pages
Author | Recent posts |
---|---|
Yom HaShoa in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Wednesday, April 26 2006 09:37
Profile
Anyone moronic enough to deny the Holocaust should go to Poland and visit the death camps before they say anything further. If it were true that there was no Holocaust, what motivation would the Polish government have for keeping these monuments to hatred around? Denying something you really have no knowledge of is one thing; doing so after seeing rooms full of the human hair and other possessions of the victims is another. [ Wednesday, April 26, 2006 09:57: Message edited by: Drew ] Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
I have to change Signature? in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Tuesday, April 25 2006 05:05
Profile
I'm all for no signatures, or at most, signatures that contain useful links. Quotes get stale quickly. Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
"'s and .'s in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Tuesday, April 25 2006 04:42
Profile
quote:The infinitive isn't always called for, so you can get around this problem by cheating a little bit: "I expect the number of newbs will more than double." The second one is simpler - the placement of the adverb just seems a bit less satisfying: "I fail to understand completely the split infinitive rule." Or perhaps, borrowing from Latin syntax, the slightly more satisfying: "I fail to understand the split infinitive rule completely." EDIT: Perhaps it's lamentable, but I've always used an apostrophe with no following "s" for the singular possessive of words ending in "s." At some point I was told that this was the rule to follow for ancient or historical names (starting with the big JC), and I so just broadened the application because I opine that it looks cleaner, context always clarifies, and no one has called me out on it. EDIT 2: As for "comprise," Americans consistently treat it as though it's interchangeable with "compose," probably because it sounds more erudite, which makes it all the more laughable and pathetic when it's misused. The sad part is, almost no one but grammar snobs and English majors are aware of this fiction. [ Tuesday, April 25, 2006 04:55: Message edited by: Drew ] Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Death Penalty in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Tuesday, April 25 2006 04:32
Profile
Probably your 8 year-old imagination. Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
"'s and .'s in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Monday, April 24 2006 10:21
Profile
I prefer the British method as well, though I still believe that those who split infinitives (as well as those who incorrectly use the verb "comprise") have a special place in Hell reserved for them. [ Monday, April 24, 2006 10:21: Message edited by: Drew ] Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Stereotypically Yours in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Monday, April 24 2006 08:21
Profile
HURGLE GURGLE I'M AGNOSTIC! I'M A MARRIED LAW STUDENT AND A HOBBESIAN DEMOCRAT WHO DEFENDS THE SYSTEM! MARK WARNER '08!!! Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Death Penalty in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Monday, April 24 2006 08:17
Profile
Heh... I thought this was going to be a discussion of the merits of the death penalty. Perhaps it would be more appropriately titled "Methods of Execution." That said, I think the lead down the throat would be the worst, from a sheer pain perspective. The other methods would take care of things relatively more quickly, I would imagine. As for whether there should be a death penalty, I say nay. There's too much uncertainty in the criminal justice system to insure that innocent people are not executed, and when an innocent person is executed, the system has failed, in my opinion. Furthermore, the large amount of time it takes between a person being sentenced to death and his actual execution limits the the impact of immediacy when considering the punishment's deterrant effect, and to top that off, almost no criminal who is likely eligible for the death penalty for his actions ever thinks that he'll get caught to begin with. So there you go. :) Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Favorite Words in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Sunday, April 23 2006 18:06
Profile
Anathema Favorite hangman word: Phlegm Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Power Corrupts in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Friday, April 21 2006 16:42
Profile
If you consider "paradise" to be living an unaware, caveman-like State of Nature existence, then you are welcome to it. I much prefer the life-lengthening/improving effects of participation in society and enjoying the protection of its laws. EDIT: On the other hand, if you describe the pre-fruit of knowledge state to be similar to the state of mind of a small child, maybe it wouldn't be so bad. I did have a great time being five. [ Friday, April 21, 2006 16:46: Message edited by: Drew ] Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Power Corrupts in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Friday, April 21 2006 16:33
Profile
quote:Well, if forgiveness requires true repentance, there you go. Or, if you consider the statement "ignorance is bliss" to be at all true, then eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge may have made existence in Eden as Adam and Eve knew it impossible - like trying to get the toothpaste back in the tube. [ Friday, April 21, 2006 16:39: Message edited by: Drew ] Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Power Corrupts in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Friday, April 21 2006 15:15
Profile
"Supposedly" = "must?" Not in my logical framework, baby. Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Power Corrupts in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Friday, April 21 2006 08:18
Profile
"Power is intoxicating. So is wine. I prefer wine." - Dr. Douglas Domingo-Forraste "Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it rocks absolutely, too." - one of the "Demotivators." The subtext of your original notion, however, is that power corrupts man. Is God a man? We don't know. Is the application of human limitations on a god apt then? I think it is not. EDIT: Ugh, Ben, here we go again! How about defining what "holy" is? If you don't, then your explanation lacks meaning. [ Friday, April 21, 2006 08:19: Message edited by: Drew ] Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Are fantasy RPGs inherently conservative? in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Tuesday, April 11 2006 14:55
Profile
quote:If we can't agree on the definition of a label, what's the use of a label? The terms Zorro used - conservative and liberal - are loaded and not well-defined terms, regularly used for other purposes. What Zorro is really doing is asking whether it is the case that most RPGs adopt the ancient Greek paradigm of kalos kai agathos, which was evident in Homer's Iliad. The answer to this rhetorical question is: yes, most do. That he associated "kalos kai agathos" with "conservative" is what I objected to - it's apples and oranges. [ Tuesday, April 11, 2006 14:57: Message edited by: Drew ] Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Are fantasy RPGs inherently conservative? in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Tuesday, April 11 2006 13:55
Profile
quote:Nice. :) Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Are fantasy RPGs inherently conservative? in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Tuesday, April 11 2006 13:12
Profile
quote:From the American Heritage Dictionary: quote: Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Are fantasy RPGs inherently conservative? in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Tuesday, April 11 2006 04:19
Profile
I don't think that it's so much that RPGs reflect a "conservative" outlook so much as a "stoic" or polarized outlook. I don't know that conservatives really own the monopoly on the "Greater Good," as much as they would like to believe it. If anything, it seems to me that most RPG PCs are trying to shake up the status quo for the sake of the "Greater Good," a tactic which is more frequently associated with Liberals. :P In all seriousness, though, I think that most RPGs adhere to a strictly good-evil paradigm for two reasons: (1) players are looking for an escape from our morally ambiguous world to a paradigm, where choices are simple and "good" choices are immediately rewarded; and (2) from a developer's perspective, it's much, much easier to develop a game that runs the gamut of all possible political motives and effects. The games that come closest to achieving the real world mentality, I think interestingly, were developed by the now-defunct Black Isle Studios - FO1 & 2 and Planescape: Torment (the Knights of the Old Republic games are kind of a pale immitation of Torment, though similar). Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Rate Galactic Core. (1 Meat/1 ur mom lol) in Richard White Games | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Thursday, April 6 2006 13:37
Profile
The trouble with Spam is the nitrates - it's ridiculously salty! Still, I would rate Spam higher than, say, tripe. Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
What happens when you die? in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Thursday, April 6 2006 13:35
Profile
Are any of us entitled to anything we post in a public forum? My understanding is that it's part of the public domain. With regard to actual accounts, I imagine they would just go the way of so many otherwise-healthy-but-non-participating noobs... Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
for those of you with humor in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Thursday, April 6 2006 13:29
Profile
If you actually want people to leave a message, I would advise making it as brief as possible. Given that most answering services currently include about 30 seconds of additional instruction, the burden of having to listen to someone else trying to be funny before you can leave a message is often too much for the average caller, and doubly so if it's someone you actually want to have take you seriously, like a prospective employer. EDIT: Not to imply that I don't have a sense of humor - I do. For example, I would find it amusing if you lost a job opportunity because of a silly phone message. Sometimes discretion outweighs the value of humor. [ Thursday, April 06, 2006 13:31: Message edited by: Drew ] Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Modern day classics in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Tuesday, March 28 2006 07:05
Profile
*Inserts obligatory comment about the derivative and inertial nature of Robert Jordan's series here.* "Things Fall Apart" by Chinua Achebe will likely make it. What about Barbara Kingsolver? It seems a number of people had good things to say about "The Poisonwood Bible." Also, in a way there are modern classics among us already - "I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings" springs to mind, as well as Orwell's works. I wonder what percentage of Oprah's book list will end up modern classics? EDIT: Ooo, also, I think it's likely that Douglas Adams will survive the test of time, though most likely for "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" as opposed to my favorite, "The Long, Dark Tea Time of the Soul." [ Tuesday, March 28, 2006 07:08: Message edited by: Drew ] Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
PDN? in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Monday, March 27 2006 12:19
Profile
Wow - you're totally right! Sounded similar though... and I wouldn't be surprised if Tyranicus were a villian in some old game. Maybe I was combining Tyranthraxus with Irenicus from BG2... :) Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
PDN? in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Monday, March 27 2006 12:02
Profile
FYI - "Tyranicus" was the name of an evil spirit that possessed a bronze dragon in the SSI gold box game (a series which may have served as inspiration for JV) "Pool of Radiance." This game was likely released before you were born. The thought that people on this board weren't even a glimmer in their father's eye when the likes of the gold box games, Dragon Warrior, or Final Fantasy 1 came out makes me feel so very old :( "Drew" is my nickname; my name is Andrew Miller. I don't like using aliases - I think they're disingenuous. [ Monday, March 27, 2006 12:05: Message edited by: Drew ] Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
Modern day classics in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Monday, March 27 2006 11:56
Profile
Patrick O'Brian, although some of those works are from outside the twenty-year window. Rushdie, for 'The Satanic Verses" on account of the fatwah, if nothing else. Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
The Periodic Table of Spiderweb in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Thursday, March 23 2006 13:25
Profile
I am Americium, because I AM. Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |
I protest. in General | |
By Committee
Member # 4233
|
written Friday, March 17 2006 05:55
Profile
Happy 2000, Spring! Posts: 2242 | Registered: Saturday, April 10 2004 07:00 |