Profile for Slarty
Field | Value |
---|---|
Displayed name | Slarty |
Member number | 261 |
Title | Raven v. Writing Desk |
Postcount | 3560 |
Homepage | http://www.stripcreator.com/comics/slartyvsdesk/ |
Registered | Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Recent posts
Pages
Author | Recent posts |
---|---|
ADV Shaping (Battle Gamma & Co.) in Geneforge Series | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Friday, June 2 2006 11:41
Profile
Homepage
No, it wouldn't. Battle Gammas already exist. They have statistics just like every other character in the games. And the only different between Battle Alphas, Betas, and Gammas is base level. That's it. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
G3 Dialog options and plot line in Geneforge Series | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Friday, June 2 2006 06:41
Profile
Homepage
I really don't remember dialogs talking about lots of servile deaths. I just played through Dhonal's, and there were lots of confused, scared, and miserable serviles, but I can't think of much of anything about serviles being killed by rogues, aside from the random bodies you find, which there aren't tons of. Were there any dialogs that stuck in your mind, maybe, that you can point me to? -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Tweaking G3 in Geneforge Series | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Friday, June 2 2006 05:44
Profile
Homepage
quote:Quoted, once again, for wisdom. I don't think I've ever implored Jeff to make specific changes before, because it's silly. But Jeff, please listen to this one :) -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
G3 Dialog options and plot line in Geneforge Series | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Friday, June 2 2006 05:41
Profile
Homepage
I think it's safe to assume that Servant Minds require far more skill, effort, and resources to create than Spawners do. You know... that whole "mind" part. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
So, who gets the most out of canister usage? in Geneforge Series | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Friday, June 2 2006 05:39
Profile
Homepage
According to Schrodinger's FAQ, you can get the following from canisters: Strength Dexterity Endurance 2 Quick Action Parry Battle Magic Mental Magic Spellcraft Fire Shaping 2 Healing Craft Luck Searer Ice Spray Essence Orbs 2 Kill Acid Shower 2 Aura of Flames Unlock Terror Dominate Strong Daze Charisma 2 Mass Madness Mass Energize Steelskin 2 Essence Armor 3 Battle Roar Group Heal 3 Major Heal 2 Mass Restore Create Fyora Create Thahd 2 Create Artila 2 Create Roamer 2 Create Vlish 2 Create Clawbug 3 Create Drayk 2 Create Glaahk 2 Create Battle Alpha 2 Create Rotghroth 2 Create Gazer 2 Create Drakon Let's be frank, for any character, these bonuses are not going to make a significant difference. The best ones (including all the basic stat bonuses) aren't available until the very end of the game. Many of the Create X bonuses aren't available until a while after you gain access to that creation, so if you make use of it in shaping you'll have sub-optimal creations anyway. That said, some of them ARE available in a timely manner. So I have to say that Shapers get by far the most out of the canisters. Vlish, Drayks, Rotghroths, and Gazers, some of the best creations, will all get extra levels. The spell bonuses are also more meaningful for Shapers than for Agents, who will have super high magic skill anyway. Guardians, of course, won't use many of the spells. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
ADV Shaping (Battle Gamma & Co.) in Geneforge Series | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Friday, June 2 2006 05:25
Profile
Homepage
I am not a Master. I just have too much time on my hands :P (something that will be changing shortly) What's to discuss, really? Jeff's already said there will be new creations in G4. It seems very likely that they will be mid-rank creations -- having a fifth tier would be silly, and the first tier is well balanced for the beginning game as is. Or maybe there will be a fourth class of creations. Regardless, a Battle Gamma would be retarded. We already have a pile of battle shaping creations that are exactly the same except for essence cost and level. We don't need yet another one. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
My God can beat up your God! in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Friday, June 2 2006 05:16
Profile
Homepage
You know, if you mocked a religion like Judaism or Christianity that way, here, you'd be attacked by many and maybe even warned. I don't appreciate anybody's religion being mocked, and that includes people who aren't here. It's just jerkish. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Peer Review Process (was Evolution Stuff (was What is Religion, exactly?)) in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Friday, June 2 2006 05:04
Profile
Homepage
quote:Thank you for that last post, Thuryl. I've been trying to say something similar for the past day or so, but have kept second-guessing my words. This distinction between "ordered" and "organized" really bugs me. It's totally arbitrary, and it just begs the question. If I follow Creator's definiton of "organized" correctly, organized things have to be constructed according to an external blueprint, i.e., with some kind of intelligent design. If we ignore man-made (and other animal-made) items, which are irrelevant to the discussion, we are left with two categories of things: 1) Things which are "ordered" and which can be made through the action of natural laws alone 2) Things which are "organized" and which require the action of some kind of intelligent design We can't separate the categories any more because that is how they have been defined. "Organized" has been defined to require external design. So when Creator asks for an example of something "organized" that came about naturally, of course there is no answer -- you've defined it that way! This is all well and good on a purely abstract, definitional level. The problem is that which things go in which category is exactly what is up for debate! Deciding whether or not a given thing requires an external blueprint or not is not a simple task. Since we can't agree on that, asking for examples of things that we claim to be in one category or the other isn't going to be very fruitful. (That said, I do notice that Kelandon's hurricane example has been conveniently ignored.) And therein lies the problem with the ID view advanced here (or at least, with my best understanding of it), which Thuryl has struck on. Life is placed in category two because people want it to be in that category. The argument that everything should really be in category one is at least within the scope of logical comprehension. The argument for category two has no clear definition of what its constituents should be. On a religious level, I have no problem with that. I think it's perfectly reasonable to play the trump card -- God -- and say this is just the way it is. But you can't use that as scientific evidence. And frankly, I have to wonder if God would want you to. Whenever I see debates about science and religion, or indeed ontological fallacies, I always think of what Dietrich Bonhoeffer said: "A God who let us prove his existence would be an idol." -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Peer Review Process (was Evolution Stuff (was What is Religion, exactly?)) in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 18:39
Profile
Homepage
Finally the topic goes somewhere pleasant. It has evolved, you might say. The Simpsons arcade game was always a favorite. It took a long time to beat, but it was very doable, and it tended to become a big collaborative event. I like things that encourage camraderie among complete strangers for good reasons, like beating up on animated sprites. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
My God can beat up your God! in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 17:01
Profile
Homepage
There's no real debate over translating "God" as Allah. The debate is over translating Allah as "God" or leaving it as "Allah". -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
My God can beat up your God! in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 16:23
Profile
Homepage
Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Blades vs. Avernum 4 in Avernum 4 | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 13:21
Profile
Homepage
If you are looking for chronological order as far as the game story goes, all the "official" Blades scenarios happen after A3 and before A4. However, there isn't much that's relevant plotwise, so it's no big deal. I would suggest playing Blades first, simply because A4's engine is very different, and switching back and forth could be annoying. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
G3 Dialog options and plot line in Geneforge Series | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 13:13
Profile
Homepage
The spawners, I'd like to point out, don't just kill serviles, or even many of them. The spawners on Dhonal's Isle, which are the ones that particularly annoyed Mike I think, those are malfunctioning and yet they seem to mostly take out loyalists. Various members of Greiner's army die, including at least one Shaper, whereas we only see a few servile corpses. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
My God can beat up your God! in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 11:10
Profile
Homepage
quote:*facepalm* Um, not true. I'm not even sure what that is supposed to mean. What are the "major points" of J, C, and I, and how are I's all the opposite of J's and C's? quote:Well, yes and no. There is some debate about whether Arabic Allah is better translated as "Allah" or "God". However, the word itself is pretty much congruent to English "God". It's a contraction of al "the" + ilah "god". So it's not Arabic for "god" but it is pretty much Arabic for "God". -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Ghosts of Stalin in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 10:48
Profile
Homepage
*nod* The main reason I took exception to Infernal's question about Asperger's is that she appeared to be using it in a more or less derogatory way. [ Thursday, June 01, 2006 10:50: Message edited by: Come On Pilgrim: Track 4 ] -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
My God can beat up your God! in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 10:43
Profile
Homepage
Cue Simpsons opening sequence. Go to Bart writing on the blackboard: MUSLIMS DO NOT CONSIDER JESUS THE SON OF GOD MUSLIMS DO NOT CONSIDER JESUS THE SON OF GOD MUSLIMS DO NOT CONSIDER JESUS THE SON OF GOD MUSLIMS DO NOT CONSIDER JESUS THE SON OF GOD MUSLIMS DO NOT CONSIDER JESUS THE SON OF GOD MUSLIMS DO NOT CONSIDER JESUS THE SON OF GOD I think you get the point. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
G3 Dialog options and plot line in Geneforge Series | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 10:26
Profile
Homepage
I don't buy it. As a political entity that may be what the Awakened turned into, but there was more to them than that. The typical Awakened servile, from all the evidence we saw in the games, was much more like Ellhrah than Tuldaric. Compare to random peasants among the Loyalists and Takers; both sects have some examples of extremely reasonable followers, and also examples of nasty and hateful ones. The Awakened have fewer of those. The Awakened leaders did fall from their high standards, and eventually the Awakened failed; perhaps both of those things were inevitable. But that's a bit like condemning Christians wholesale based on the despicable actions some Christians in powerful places have taken in the name of their religion. Except that it's easier to be sympathetic to the Awakened, since they have pretty much always been on the defensive. Also, since when have the Takers/Rebels had any qualms about enslaving other creatures? [ Thursday, June 01, 2006 10:27: Message edited by: Come On Pilgrim: Track 4 ] -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Ghosts of Stalin in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 10:12
Profile
Homepage
*facepalm* Major, enough already. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Peer Review Process (was Evolution Stuff (was What is Religion, exactly?)) in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 06:43
Profile
Homepage
No, Salmon is right. It sounds like GremlinJoe is interested in an arbitrary definition of order. Randomly pressing typewriter keys will create a result with some kinds of order, as he observes, but "true order" according to him comes from forming a coherent sentence. What makes one flavor of order truer than another? A sentence is coherent because its components follow certain arbitrary rules of language and logic. A sentence is horizontally lined up because its components follow certain arbitrary rules of typography. Neither logic, nor grammar, nor parallel lines have any special claim to "true order." "Total chaos" with "no rules" sounds implausible. If there are no rules at all, then that means no rules governing how different substances act or interact, right? Hydrogen and oxygen could react to produce water or uranium or anything under the sun. Relationships between the different parts of the world cannot exist, by definition. Then you have no coherent world to speak of, just random noise in the form of matter. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Peer Review Process (was Evolution Stuff (was What is Religion, exactly?)) in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 05:11
Profile
Homepage
quote:This makes no sense. At all. You're going to need to define what you mean by "truly ordered" and "true chaos" -- it's not apparent. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
G3 Dialog options and plot line in Geneforge Series | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 03:08
Profile
Homepage
Yes, as you mention, the Awakened tried that. They died. Not a better solution at all. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Tweaking G3 in Geneforge Series | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 03:03
Profile
Homepage
quote:Personally, I'd rather do away with encumbrance entirely -- at least for items in the pack, if perhaps not equipment and combat use items. This seems to go in the same category as all the random "player efficiency improvements" Jeff put into A4, of removing things that are a hassle and don't add to gameplay. It's very annoying to have to walk through each area a second time picking stuff up, especially when you are limited to the speed your sprite walks at and can't just 789879987 your way through the area. I guess that is a class balance issue. The thing is, it doesn't actually make the Agent and Shaper any weaker. It just makes them more annoying to play. (Well, the Agent. The Shaper it just tends to push into becoming a Deadweight Shaper whether he intends to or not.) Annoying = bad, in my book. quote:HUH? Batons and crystals are easier to obtain than spells? Spells are unlimited use, items aren't, and the best items are of limited supply. Anyway, baton damage has been reduced between games. In normal G3, they do 1-3 per level (all of them except reapers). That's the weakest player attack in the game. Firebolt also does 1-3 per level, but almost every enemy has armor, whereas fire resistance is uncommon, so batons are actually worse than Firebolt. Crystals and wands on the other hand are exactly as deadly as spells since they have the same effects. Spells, of course, have unlimited uses (in both theory and practice, considering the absurd quantity of Essence Pods in the game), whereas the good crystals and wands run out if you use them on every enemy. Crystals are the best missiles, no question, since you get the AP bonus and you can keep a stat-boosting weapon equipped. There just aren't enough of them to rely on crystals alone as a primary attack. I think that's more than enough of a restriction. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Playing on Torment in Geneforge Series | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 02:46
Profile
Homepage
I sense the start of a completely awful children's dental health campaign featuring Mojo Jojo, DDS and the Powerpuff Girls. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Peer Review Process (was Evolution Stuff (was What is Religion, exactly?)) in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 02:41
Profile
Homepage
quote:I don't entirely disagree with your point, but Buddhism definitely has rules -- the Eightfold Path comes to mind. I know there are Westerners who take a general Buddhist philosophy and don't pay attention to specific directives, and call themselves Buddhist, but that seems a bit akin to self-professed Jews or Christians who ignore the Commandments. Should they still count as Buddhist, and as being religious? Sure, but they don't have a complete overlap with what is traditionally thought of as being Buddhist. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Why is this? in General | |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Thursday, June 1 2006 02:32
Profile
Homepage
quote:Or how many undead topics they started. :P If you make that, a simple calculation to do a stat for "average number of posts in topics started by member" would also be nice. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |