Profile for Ash Lael

Error message

Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /var/www/pied-piper.ermarian.net/includes/common.inc).

Recent posts

Pages

AuthorRecent posts
Our President in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #53
quote:
Originally written by Drew:

1.) As a person, I think that Bush can pray however he likes. In his official capacity as POTUS, I think he ought to lay off. Christian prayers don't represent everyone's faith, and the U.S. government is a secular institution - let's keep it that way.

2.) No one is preventing anyone from practicing their faith. The matter is whether a particular religious practice has a place in a secular institution designed to incorporate people of all faiths.

3.) Separation of Church and State is infered from the U.S. Constitution, not a part of it. It was discussed at further length in the Federalist Papers, which, though venerated, aren't laws. Before Ben and Ash get their panties in a bunch, though, it must be pointed out that this inference has been affirmed by Supreme Court decisions over the years, including the most recent Ten Commandments monument issue.

When there are no rules either way for how the President (or any other member of the government) should act with regards to religion, the government is non-religious.

When there are rules that say the President should not act in a religious manner, the government is anti-religious.

Bush is not America and he is not even the US government. If he prays, it doesn't mean America is praying or that America should pray, any more than if he speaks with a Texan accent it means that America is speaking with a Texan accent or that America should speak with a Texan accent. If he tells a joke, it doesn't mean that America thinks it's funny.

I'm not really defending Bush. I doubt he'd be praying before speeches or whatever if it was politically damaging. But I'd be opposed to a rule that could forbid a sincere, religious person from doing what he genuinely felt compelled to do by his religion, irrespective of political consequences.

EDIT: Think of it this way. Preventing the President from referring to God because some people don't believe in God would be like preventing him from reffering to evolution because some people don't believe it happened.

[ Wednesday, August 03, 2005 15:55: Message edited by: Ash Lael ]

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Our President in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #18
It wouldn't be politically savvy, so it probably wouldn't happen (in Australia, atheism is the majority, we have a Christian Prime Minister, but he never prays before speeches or anything like that). But if he wanted to do it anyway, I'd say that would be completely acceptable.

There is seperation of Church and State, but there is also freedom of religion. Forbidding someone from practicing their religion is as bad as forcing them to practise yours. Not allowing the state itself to assume a religion is one thing, not allowing individuals within the government to publicly practise their faith is another entirely. In the same way, I wouldn't support schools forcing students to pray, and I wouldn't support schools forbidding students to pray.

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Our President in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #16
quote:
Originally written by Spring:

What Ash said in his first post.

I am not a supporter of Bush, or anyone he has convinced to go to war with. Sure, the capture of Saddam Hussein was good, but there is still no need to still be in Iraq. Let them make their own country and stop playing God, Bush.

Um, there's people being killed every day and the Iraqis are not yet able to maintain law and order on their own. Whether we should have gone in the first place is a seperate issue, but leaving now would be wrong.

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Our President in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #15
quote:
Originally written by Zaiu:

I see no logic in saying "I am offended that the president didn't pray." when there is supposed to be a separation of church and state. If the president kept all religious references out of his speeches he would only be fallowing the constitution :P
How do you manage to spell "follow" as "fallow" twice in as many posts? :confused:

There's a clear difference between a president choosing not to pray and a president wanting to pray and not being allowed to. The former is not offensive, the latter certainly could be.

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Our President in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #11
Ah, but if you're playing the Overall Amount of Offense card, surely the number of offended people has to come into play as well? And with Christians being the majority in America... :P

Or you could just say that if it's not public policy, it's no big deal and he can pray to his uncle's left toenail if he feels like it.

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Our President in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #8
quote:
Originally written by Zaiu:

Bush has prayed to God/Jesus (while standing with government seals and American flags) on national television before making speeches; how does this support the Americans who are members of other faiths or are atheist?
Surely by the same coin you could ask how it was supporting those who are not athiestic/agnostic if he did nothing? :P

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Scenario Contest Entries in Blades of Avernum
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #9
Yes, but the porting function sucked. The bits that didn't get ported properly (most of it) he remade differently.

--------------------
SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Our President in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #1
1) Many people here, like myself, are not from the US and so Bush is not 'our' president.

2) Oh no, here we go again.

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
What scenarios hve you done? in Blades of Avernum
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #14
I've not played Canopy or anything made since.

--------------------
SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Delete this thread please. in Richard White Games
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #23
And then the wolf howled.

--------------------
SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
THE PEARL CONTEST BEGINS in Blades of Exile
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #5
Fixed. Sorry, Kel.

--------------------
SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Scenario Contest Entries in Blades of Avernum
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #7
RoR is not a port.

--------------------
SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
I am wed. in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #24
Congratulations! I wish all the best for you, your bride, and your union. :)

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Scariest thing... in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #10
quote:
Originally written by Marlenny:

Damn Ash, that was pretty harsh. My parents used to scare me all the time, but it had more to do with sending me to live with my aunt than to skin me alive.
Don't imagine my old man is a monster, he's a really good bloke. Thing is, his own father wasn't much fun to grow up around, so he made sure he didn't do any of the stuff that he hated when he was a kid. He never got angry and delivered a boot up the backside, he'd tell us what the rules were, what the punishment was if we broke them, and carried out those punishments calmly and consistently. He used to get told stuff like "I wish I'd hit you on the head with a hammer when you were born," so he made sure he didn't say things he didn't mean. All very admirable, but the side effect was that one day when things had been going badly and he was in a bad mood he said something carelessly and terrified me out of my eight year old mind. :)

It was six years before my parents realized that the reason I was so upset was that I thought he'd actually meant it.

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Scariest thing... in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #5
quote:
Originally written by Slp006:

Myst really creeped me out when I was six. Seeing Achenar's room full of torture implements in the Mechanical Age scarred me forever.
Hey, me too! And that animated version of Watership down - oh, the horror.

Most scared I've ever been was once when my Dad said he'd skin me alive if I didn't shut the gate properly and the sheep got out of the yards. See, my Dad had never failed to deliver on a threat up to that point. I thought he meant it. And I'd helped skin sheep plenty of times, so I knew what was involved. I was utterly traumatized.

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
THE PEARL CONTEST BEGINS in Blades of Exile
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #0
THE PEARL: You are ordered to execute someone.

Who is it? Did he/she deserve it? Do you succeed? Do you even obey the order? Is this how the scenario starts, or ends, or does it happen somewhere in the middle? All these questions and more are to be answered by - YOU!

To enter the Pearl Contest, you need to design a scenario that includes the above plot point. The context in which this happens is up to you. It can be a moral dilemna, a tragic event, or the impetus for something great, or something else entirely. The more central this event is to the story, and the more unique your version of this basic idea is, the better.

For clarification: "Execution" here means more than just "There are some pesky goblins nearby. Kill them." but does not necessarily have to be an official noose/guillotine affair with a trial and everything.

The deadline is the end of September. Judging will be done by discussion. The primary concern is the quality of the scenario, though how original the approach to the Pearl itself is and how integral it is to the story will also be a factor.

Both BoE and BoA scenarios will be eligible, though they may or may not compete directly against each other.

Entries are to be sent to tomwatts (at) berkeley (dot) edu.

What are you waiting for? GO!

[ Tuesday, August 02, 2005 14:23: Message edited by: Ash Lael ]

--------------------
SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
THE PEARL CONTEST BEGINS in Blades of Avernum
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #0
THE PEARL: You are ordered to execute someone.

Who is it? Did he/she deserve it? Do you succeed? Do you even obey the order? Is this how the scenario starts, or ends, or does it happen somewhere in the middle? All these questions and more are to be answered by - YOU!

To enter the Pearl Contest, you need to design a scenario that includes the above plot point. The context in which this happens is up to you. It can be a moral dilemna, a tragic event, or the impetus for something great, or something else entirely. The more central this event is to the story, and the more unique your version of this basic idea is, the better.

For clarification: "Execution" here means more than just "There are some pesky goblins nearby. Kill them." but does not necessarily have to be an official noose/guillotine affair with a trial and everything.

The deadline is the end of September. Judging will be done by discussion. The primary concern is the quality of the scenario, though how original the approach to the Pearl itself is and how integral it is to the story will also be a factor.

Both BoE and BoA scenarios will be eligible, though they may or may not compete directly against each other.

Entries are to be sent to tomwatts (at) berkeley(dot) edu.

What are you waiting for? GO!

[ Tuesday, August 02, 2005 14:24: Message edited by: Ash Lael ]

--------------------
SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Scent of new-mown hay in Richard White Games
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #95
Ben, forcing people to flee their country because of their beliefs ain't a good thing.

--------------------
SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Scent of new-mown hay in Richard White Games
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #93
quote:
Originally written by Zorro:

Abortion is a medical procedure. Do you really think it is the government's job to determine whether or not you are allowed a medical procedure, rather than you and your doctor? Do not come back saying "but its murder" because if you really believed there was a holocaust of about 1 million babies being killed every year, you wouldn't just sit around and vote Republican, and post a message on the boards. I think anti-abortionists who bomb clinics are criminals, but they're the only ones who behave as if they believed what they say.
A great many people believe that one evil does not justify another.

In addition to that, there's the fact that in the long run, bombing clinics may only hurt your cause. There are always going to be more clinics, people can go to them instead. If you do enough to actually make an impact on people's actions, the cops are going to go after you pretty hard, and you'll get caught eventually. In the meantime, you've sent a message to the rest of the country that anti-abortionists are violent, dangerous, crazy. When they hear a reasonable, rational person arguing against abortion, there's every chance they'll just dismiss him out of hand. And so the state-sanctioned massacre continues.

And then there's the fact that no one is able to take on every injustice of this world and try to fix them all. Thousands are starving in Africa. You really believe that, I assume, and yet you're posting on a message board. Maybe standing by and not accepting the troubles of someone else as your responsibility isn't right, but it's the only way you can stay sane.

What some pro-life groups do instead of bombing or protesting is set up their own health care clinic next door. They put out a big sign saying "Free Ultrasounds Today". Women who intend to have abortions frequently change their minds after seeing the ultrasound images - I forget the figures, but I believe it's over 50%. Measures like these are more effective and certainly more moral than bombing clinics.

--------------------
SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
RICHARD WHITE LEGAL TEAM in Richard White Games
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #38
quote:
Originally written by Stugri-La:

Well, sure, I never attempted to argue that the Beatles or any other band I enjoy was entirely non-commercial. There's absolutely nothing wrong with artists attempting to make commercial, accessible music. The trouble comes when an artist becomes so slavishly devoted to pleasing the masses and increasing his bottom line that he refuses to allow for the slightest bit of spontaneity or experimentation in his music. The Beatles might have necessarily started out with a calculated formula, but what counts is that their focus was always on advancement, on (admittedly, carefully regulated) experimentation. Hell, do you ever see any of these modern hit machines include 9-minute orgies of seemingly random noisemaking on their albums? Didn't think so.
Well, they aren't exactly pop, but Linkin Park are fairly experimental.

quote:
You're quite right that loads of horrible music was produced in the sixties and seventies. However, you can't deny that both decades were chock full of enduring classics as well. I just can't seem to hunt up anything approaching that caliber from the last twenty-five years. And believe me, I've been looking.
Perhaps it's just an issue of taste? While Johnny O'Keefe and Elvis certainly aren't my thing, and Mozart even less so, I wouldn't say they were bad musicians. Different eras, different sounds, different preferences. Still, I find it hard to beilieve you can't find one that does it for you.

quote:
Ash, I understand the realities of the music business, and I'm really not as much of an artistic snob as you seem to believe. If I truly enjoyed Britney's music (as you seem to), I wouldn't give a damn about who wrote it and what-not. But the fact is, I can't stand the stuff. The melodies are fine, yes, but everything about the performances and production is over-calculated and over-professionalized. It's so slick and devoid of sincerity that it makes me downright nauseous.

You're right, modern pop music is more than just Britney and the boy band brigade. But I don't really find much to like in the "indie" or "alternative" genres, either. Most of these acts are derivative, even imitative, to a degree that they're absolutely superfluous to anyone with broad exposure to sixties and seventies pop/rock.
Ah, I understand you a bit better now. I like a slick production job, personally (and by extension, electronic music). The sheer plastic-ness of many of the performers does bug me as well, though (but apparently not to the same extent).

I could try suggesting a couple of lesser-known artists if you wanted. Mind, I'd probably have less success than you did trying to get me onto the Beatles. :P

quote:
As for Trevor Horn, I am familiar with the name. He was a member of that lightweight pop duo the Buggles, wasn't he? Later, he joined the washed-out prog-rock group Yes and recorded an offensively lousy album or two with them. He's slavishly corporate and thoroughly uninteresting as far as I'm concerned.
Personally, I think Video Killed The Radio Star is still a classic, but that's beside the point. I was referring to his achievements as a producer (and to a lesser extent, songwriter) for other artists. He's done tracks like Can't Fight The Moonlight, All The Things She Said, Kiss From A Rose, Belfast Child, and tons of other great songs that you may or may not have liked, but loads of other people loved. Heck, even Paul McCartney has used him. Are you going to argue with him? ;)

quote:
I think some genres and styles just go away. Some resurface at intervals in different forms (ska, swing, others), and some just die (disco, acid rock). If your favorite genre is one that died, that era is going to sound better than any other.
Why does no one make music like Bach anymore? :(

[ Saturday, July 30, 2005 23:58: Message edited by: Ash Lael ]

--------------------
SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Long-distance relationships? in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #10
quote:
Originally written by demonslaeyr:

And here's some Christian bashing: most people in America are Christian. That doesn't stop them from committing horrible acts of the heart-breaking type. I speak from experience when I say, don't rely on that.
To be fair, "Christian" has become almost a meaninglessly broad term. It hardly implies one individual set of beliefs these days. So while Sherlock appears to consider Christianity and cheating on your internet boyfriend to be incompatible, someone else may not. I'd consider homosexuality and Christianity to be incompatible, but quite obviously not everyone shares that view. Point is, I'm sure Sherlock and his boyfriend have discussed their religious beliefs in more depth than just comparing labels.

As regards the actual topic, I'm probably the world's least qualified person to comment. :P

[ Saturday, July 30, 2005 22:37: Message edited by: Ash Lael ]

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Web "anonymity" vs. real life identity in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #10
I've never really cared about privacy. A random stranger could read a personal letter of mine and it wouldn't bother me at all.

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
RICHARD WHITE LEGAL TEAM in Richard White Games
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #35
quote:
Originally written by Stugri-La:

Of course there's nothing at all wrong with pop. That modern pop is lousy more often than not is merely a reflection of the massively corporate modern music industry. The tunes may be good, but they're over-calculated and devoid of sincerity. There's very little room left for artistic integrity when the music is so utterly commercialized. Production is ultra-slick, backing bands are soulless and professionalized, and style and image trump over actual talent.

Not that I feel that modern rock or any of the "alternative" genres are any better. And I've always despised hip-hop and its ilk.

Oh, the good ol' "Money destroys art" argument. :P

A record contract is a business deal, nothing more, nothing less. It's not an artistic grant. I doubt we'll disagree here.

The record companies just want to make money. So they have people to write the songs, produce the records, play the instruments, tune the vocals, etc. Quite often in mainstream pop, the 'artist' is little more than a marketing tool - but hey, they have specialists for everything else.

Trever Horn is a brilliant music-maker. Most people don't have a clue who he is (though they definitely know his work). While he might be the creative force behind a killer track, it makes the record company more money to give it to a pair of Russian lesbians. And hey, Horn probably prefers not being in the gossip mags and having to tour all the time.

Most listeners don't care - the end product sounds good. I put myself firmly in this category. Britney is a talentless skank, sure. But someone wrote a darn catchy song called Toxic.

'Course, if you're the sort of person who likes the name on the record to correspond with the creative force behind the project, you do get left out in the cold a bit. There's the occasional talented singer/songwriter, but by and large you're better off looking away from the mainstream - the ones who refuse to 'sell out' don't have record deals, you see. Or to rock, where you tend to have bands rather than just singers.

What was my point again? Oh yeah, in my opinion mainstream pop (and by this I'm referring to the music itself) is by and large unharmed or possibly even helped by the massive amounts of money that are involved. And even if you disagree, your beef is with MAINSTREAM pop, not MODERN pop. The modern music industry isn't massively corporate - just the bits you see on MTV are. There are loads of people making a living making the music they want to make rather than the music commercial radio wants to play. Independent artists still top the charts from time to time.

--------------------
SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
Official Election Final Round Voting in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #353
I could sing a song - but I warn you, I'm pretty bad.

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00
THE ABOMINABLE PHOTO THREAD: THE THIRD COMING! in General
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
Profile Homepage #149
quote:
Originally written by Schrodinger:

...in addition to getting married and buying a house :) .
Congratulations! :)

--------------------
Sex is easier than love.
Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00

Pages