GOOGLE is GOD!!
Pages
- 1
- 2
| Author | Topic: GOOGLE is GOD!! |
|---|---|
|
Infiltrator
Member # 6136
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 13:57
Profile
Google is god Follow the link, what we have been waiting my brothers is finally here! XD It's a very funny page, considering that I worship google in many ways... Posts: 446 | Registered: Friday, July 22 2005 07:00 |
|
Agent
Member # 4574
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 14:02
Profile
Interesting, I only read the first page. Hmm, my description of a god whoever is a being that is immortal, and holds more power than anyother thing can physically or spiritualy hold. This definition I've given it eliminates the possibility of more than one deity. -------------------- Constitutional monarchies are the in monarchies. Posts: 1186 | Registered: Friday, June 18 2004 07:00 |
|
Shaper
Member # 73
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 14:08
Profile
No it doesn't. Your definition could be wrong. I could define "potato" as "a machine that performs mathematical functions". That doesn't mean my definition is correct. -------------------- My Myspace, with some of my audial and visual art The Lyceum - The Headquarters of the Blades designing community The Louvre - The Blades of Avernum graphics database Alexandria - The Blades of Exile Scenario database BoE Webring - Self explanatory Polaris - Free porn here Odd Todd - Fun for the unemployed (and everyone else too) They Might Be Giants - Four websites for one of the greatest bands in existance -------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Posts: 2957 | Registered: Thursday, October 4 2001 07:00 |
|
Agent
Member # 4574
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 14:11
Profile
I only said the definition I've given it. I never said that my definition is correct. -------------------- Constitutional monarchies are the in monarchies. Posts: 1186 | Registered: Friday, June 18 2004 07:00 |
|
Shaper
Member # 7420
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 14:19
Profile
Homepage
Does this make AOL satan? -------------------- You lose. Posts: 2156 | Registered: Thursday, August 24 2006 07:00 |
|
Agent
Member # 4574
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 14:33
Profile
Just looked through it again. Microsoft is their satan. -------------------- Constitutional monarchies are the in monarchies. Posts: 1186 | Registered: Friday, June 18 2004 07:00 |
|
Shaper
Member # 7420
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 14:40
Profile
Homepage
quote:This gets my Emperor's Seal of Approval™. -------------------- You lose. Posts: 2156 | Registered: Thursday, August 24 2006 07:00 |
|
Infiltrator
Member # 3040
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 15:08
Profile
quote:How do you quantitatively measure power? What if there's a tie? Given any two powerful entities, is there an algorithm to determine which has more power? If there were two serious contestants with godlike amounts of power, would there be anyone in a position to apply the algorithm and tell people the results? -------------------- 5.0.1.0.0.0.0.1.0... Posts: 508 | Registered: Thursday, May 29 2003 07:00 |
|
Guardian
Member # 2238
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 15:43
Profile
Homepage
Force*Mass... -------------------- DEMON PLAY, DEMON OUT! Posts: 1582 | Registered: Wednesday, November 13 2002 08:00 |
|
Shaper
Member # 32
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 16:02
Profile
quote:Definitions are always correct. However, they might not be refering to the object you think they are. As far as that definition of a potato, I find it completely reasonable. -------------------- Lt. Sullust Cogito Ergo Sum Polaris Posts: 2462 | Registered: Wednesday, October 3 2001 07:00 |
|
Law Bringer
Member # 6785
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 17:55
Profile
Even if Google hasn't reached godhood yet it is growing in power so by some definitions it will get there. Posts: 4643 | Registered: Friday, February 10 2006 08:00 |
|
Law Bringer
Member # 335
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 17:59
Profile
Homepage
Power is the derivative of work with respect to time or a closed line integral that can be simplified to the product of force and distance. Force times mass is not so useful. —Alorael, who thinks that choosing to give something two conflicting definitions is a bad idea. Among other problems, it leads to the English language. Posts: 14579 | Registered: Saturday, December 1 2001 08:00 |
|
Agent
Member # 2820
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 18:29
Profile
I think this was inevitable. But it was still entertaining beyond imagination. It's too bad they discourage spam campaigns to spread the word. They are rejecting the foremost form of modern missionary method. Honestly, do any of you ever use MSN or Yahoo! over Google nowadays? -------------------- Thuryl: I mean, most of us don't go around consuming our own bodily fluids, no matter how delicious they are. ==== Alorael: War and violence would end if we all had each other's babies! ==== Drakefyre: Those are hideous mangos. Posts: 1415 | Registered: Thursday, March 27 2003 08:00 |
|
Master
Member # 4614
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 18:42
Profile
Homepage
My browser defaults to MSN. :/ *clicks Favorites / Google* -------------------- -ben4808 Posts: 3360 | Registered: Friday, June 25 2004 07:00 |
|
Guardian
Member # 2238
|
written Saturday, September 9 2006 19:29
Profile
Homepage
quote:lol. Parental blocks prohibit blasphemous material. -------------------- DEMON PLAY, DEMON OUT! Posts: 1582 | Registered: Wednesday, November 13 2002 08:00 |
|
Lifecrafter
Member # 6403
|
written Sunday, September 10 2006 04:54
Profile
quote:Amen. -------------------- ??? ?????? ???? ????? Posts: 883 | Registered: Wednesday, October 19 2005 07:00 |
|
Law Bringer
Member # 6785
|
written Sunday, September 10 2006 05:50
Profile
You have to choose the definition you want. Remember how Clinton played with semantics when he was questioned? Of course he was a lawyer, so don't try this at home. Posts: 4643 | Registered: Friday, February 10 2006 08:00 |
|
Agent
Member # 2820
|
written Sunday, September 10 2006 07:23
Profile
I think a definition can be just as wrong as any other belief. If you think it is right, it is right for you. If lots of others think it's wrong, it still doesn't prove anything. Thus, the Church of Googlism is as valid a religion as any other. -------------------- Thuryl: I mean, most of us don't go around consuming our own bodily fluids, no matter how delicious they are. ==== Alorael: War and violence would end if we all had each other's babies! ==== Drakefyre: Those are hideous mangos. Posts: 1415 | Registered: Thursday, March 27 2003 08:00 |
|
Law Bringer
Member # 2984
|
written Sunday, September 10 2006 08:22
Profile
Homepage
I can't tell how much of it is a joke. From the assumption that they are serious, I have two comments: Firstly, they are entirely right in saying that Google is the closest that any entity we know to exist has ever come to omniscience/omnipresence. Secondly, they are entirely delusional about their idea of "worship". Worshipping Google in the way of traditional religions makes about as much sense as believing in Einstein's relativity theory as a religious principle. Having "blind faith" in science is as deluded as trying to "prove" religion. But I'm probably just ruining the joke. :P Edit: Speaking of religion, did you know that the Vatican State has its own top level domain, .va? I didn't. (They also have a badly coded - though admittedly nicely designed - online presence, so that point is for Google. :P ) [ Sunday, September 10, 2006 08:28: Message edited by: Drow ] -------------------- Encyclopaedia Ermariana • Forum Archives • Forum Statistics • RSS [Topic / Forum] My Blog • Polaris • I eat novels for breakfast. Polaris is dead, long live Polaris. Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair. Posts: 8752 | Registered: Wednesday, May 14 2003 07:00 |
|
Agent
Member # 2820
|
written Sunday, September 10 2006 12:05
Profile
They don't want to ruin the joke either, which is why they don't have light-hearted laugh about it on their site. My above comments apply to everyone's beliefs except for TimeCube. -------------------- Thuryl: I mean, most of us don't go around consuming our own bodily fluids, no matter how delicious they are. ==== Alorael: War and violence would end if we all had each other's babies! ==== Drakefyre: Those are hideous mangos. Posts: 1415 | Registered: Thursday, March 27 2003 08:00 |
|
Agent
Member # 1934
|
written Sunday, September 10 2006 12:40
Profile
Homepage
Ugh. I just read 15 on the philosophy behind the Ontologicial argument. No more God discussions please. My head hurts enough. -------------------- You acquire an item: Radio Free Foil Posts: 1169 | Registered: Monday, September 23 2002 07:00 |
|
Shaper
Member # 5450
|
written Sunday, September 10 2006 21:32
Profile
Homepage
quote:Chuck us a link this way, please. -------------------- I'll put a Spring in your step. :ph34r: Posts: 2396 | Registered: Saturday, January 29 2005 08:00 |
|
Law Bringer
Member # 2984
|
written Sunday, September 10 2006 22:13
Profile
Homepage
http://www.vatican.va . Who'd have thought it? :P -------------------- Encyclopaedia Ermariana • Forum Archives • Forum Statistics • RSS [Topic / Forum] My Blog • Polaris • I eat novels for breakfast. Polaris is dead, long live Polaris. Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair. Posts: 8752 | Registered: Wednesday, May 14 2003 07:00 |
|
Agent
Member # 1934
|
written Monday, September 11 2006 08:44
Profile
Homepage
That's a neat site. It's not all boring and dreary like I thought it would be. -------------------- You acquire an item: Radio Free Foil Posts: 1169 | Registered: Monday, September 23 2002 07:00 |
|
Law Bringer
Member # 335
|
written Monday, September 11 2006 10:46
Profile
Homepage
I dislike the site design, though. I wonder if there's a shortage of devout web designers? —Alorael, who thinks Google's divinity has already been established. Thou art God! Posts: 14579 | Registered: Saturday, December 1 2001 08:00 |
Pages
- 1
- 2