GOOGLE is GOD!!

Pages

AuthorTopic: GOOGLE is GOD!!
Infiltrator
Member # 6136
Profile #0
Google is god
Follow the link, what we have been waiting my brothers is finally here! XD
It's a very funny page, considering that I worship google in many ways...
Posts: 446 | Registered: Friday, July 22 2005 07:00
Agent
Member # 4574
Profile #1
Interesting, I only read the first page. Hmm, my description of a god whoever is a being that is immortal, and holds more power than anyother thing can physically or spiritualy hold. This definition I've given it eliminates the possibility of more than one deity.

--------------------
Constitutional monarchies are the in monarchies.
Posts: 1186 | Registered: Friday, June 18 2004 07:00
Shaper
Member # 73
Profile #2
No it doesn't. Your definition could be wrong. I could define "potato" as "a machine that performs mathematical functions". That doesn't mean my definition is correct.

--------------------
My Myspace, with some of my audial and visual art
The Lyceum - The Headquarters of the Blades designing community
The Louvre - The Blades of Avernum graphics database
Alexandria - The Blades of Exile Scenario database
BoE Webring - Self explanatory
Polaris - Free porn here
Odd Todd - Fun for the unemployed (and everyone else too)
They Might Be Giants - Four websites for one of the greatest bands in existance
--------------------
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Posts: 2957 | Registered: Thursday, October 4 2001 07:00
Agent
Member # 4574
Profile #3
I only said the definition I've given it. I never said that my definition is correct.

--------------------
Constitutional monarchies are the in monarchies.
Posts: 1186 | Registered: Friday, June 18 2004 07:00
Shaper
Member # 7420
Profile Homepage #4
Does this make AOL satan?

--------------------
You lose.
Posts: 2156 | Registered: Thursday, August 24 2006 07:00
Agent
Member # 4574
Profile #5
Just looked through it again. Microsoft is their satan.

--------------------
Constitutional monarchies are the in monarchies.
Posts: 1186 | Registered: Friday, June 18 2004 07:00
Shaper
Member # 7420
Profile Homepage #6
quote:
Originally written by Emperorking:

Microsoft is their satan.
This gets my Emperor's Seal of Approval™.

--------------------
You lose.
Posts: 2156 | Registered: Thursday, August 24 2006 07:00
Infiltrator
Member # 3040
Profile #7
quote:
Originally written by Emperorking:

Interesting, I only read the first page. Hmm, my description of a god whoever is a being that is immortal, and holds more power than anyother thing can physically or spiritualy hold. This definition I've given it eliminates the possibility of more than one deity.
How do you quantitatively measure power? What if there's a tie? Given any two powerful entities, is there an algorithm to determine which has more power? If there were two serious contestants with godlike amounts of power, would there be anyone in a position to apply the algorithm and tell people the results?

--------------------
5.0.1.0.0.0.0.1.0...
Posts: 508 | Registered: Thursday, May 29 2003 07:00
Guardian
Member # 2238
Profile Homepage #8
Force*Mass...

--------------------
DEMON PLAY,
DEMON OUT!
Posts: 1582 | Registered: Wednesday, November 13 2002 08:00
Shaper
Member # 32
Profile #9
quote:
Originally written by The Almighty Do-er of Stuff:

No it doesn't. Your definition could be wrong. I could define "potato" as "a machine that performs mathematical functions". That doesn't mean my definition is correct.
Definitions are always correct. However, they might not be refering to the object you think they are. As far as that definition of a potato, I find it completely reasonable.

--------------------
Lt. Sullust
Cogito Ergo Sum
Polaris
Posts: 2462 | Registered: Wednesday, October 3 2001 07:00
Law Bringer
Member # 6785
Profile #10
Even if Google hasn't reached godhood yet it is growing in power so by some definitions it will get there.
Posts: 4643 | Registered: Friday, February 10 2006 08:00
Law Bringer
Member # 335
Profile Homepage #11
Power is the derivative of work with respect to time or a closed line integral that can be simplified to the product of force and distance. Force times mass is not so useful.

—Alorael, who thinks that choosing to give something two conflicting definitions is a bad idea. Among other problems, it leads to the English language.
Posts: 14579 | Registered: Saturday, December 1 2001 08:00
Agent
Member # 2820
Profile #12
I think this was inevitable. But it was still entertaining beyond imagination. It's too bad they discourage spam campaigns to spread the word. They are rejecting the foremost form of modern missionary method.

Honestly, do any of you ever use MSN or Yahoo! over Google nowadays?

--------------------
Thuryl: I mean, most of us don't go around consuming our own bodily fluids, no matter how delicious they are.
====
Alorael: War and violence would end if we all had each other's babies!
====
Drakefyre: Those are hideous mangos.
Posts: 1415 | Registered: Thursday, March 27 2003 08:00
Master
Member # 4614
Profile Homepage #13
My browser defaults to MSN. :/

*clicks Favorites / Google*

--------------------
-ben4808
Posts: 3360 | Registered: Friday, June 25 2004 07:00
Guardian
Member # 2238
Profile Homepage #14
quote:
Originally written by Sturg:

My browser defaults to MSN. :/

*clicks Favorites / Google*

lol. Parental blocks prohibit blasphemous material.

--------------------
DEMON PLAY,
DEMON OUT!
Posts: 1582 | Registered: Wednesday, November 13 2002 08:00
Lifecrafter
Member # 6403
Profile #15
quote:
Originally written by Alorael:

choosing to give something two conflicting definitions is a bad idea. Among other problems, it leads to the English language.
Amen.

--------------------
??? ??????
???? ?????
Posts: 883 | Registered: Wednesday, October 19 2005 07:00
Law Bringer
Member # 6785
Profile #16
You have to choose the definition you want. Remember how Clinton played with semantics when he was questioned? Of course he was a lawyer, so don't try this at home.
Posts: 4643 | Registered: Friday, February 10 2006 08:00
Agent
Member # 2820
Profile #17
I think a definition can be just as wrong as any other belief. If you think it is right, it is right for you. If lots of others think it's wrong, it still doesn't prove anything. Thus, the Church of Googlism is as valid a religion as any other.

--------------------
Thuryl: I mean, most of us don't go around consuming our own bodily fluids, no matter how delicious they are.
====
Alorael: War and violence would end if we all had each other's babies!
====
Drakefyre: Those are hideous mangos.
Posts: 1415 | Registered: Thursday, March 27 2003 08:00
Law Bringer
Member # 2984
Profile Homepage #18
I can't tell how much of it is a joke. From the assumption that they are serious, I have two comments: Firstly, they are entirely right in saying that Google is the closest that any entity we know to exist has ever come to omniscience/omnipresence. Secondly, they are entirely delusional about their idea of "worship". Worshipping Google in the way of traditional religions makes about as much sense as believing in Einstein's relativity theory as a religious principle. Having "blind faith" in science is as deluded as trying to "prove" religion.

But I'm probably just ruining the joke. :P

Edit: Speaking of religion, did you know that the Vatican State has its own top level domain, .va? I didn't. (They also have a badly coded - though admittedly nicely designed - online presence, so that point is for Google. :P )

[ Sunday, September 10, 2006 08:28: Message edited by: Drow ]

--------------------
Encyclopaedia ErmarianaForum ArchivesForum StatisticsRSS [Topic / Forum]
My BlogPolarisI eat novels for breakfast.
Polaris is dead, long live Polaris.
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair.
Posts: 8752 | Registered: Wednesday, May 14 2003 07:00
Agent
Member # 2820
Profile #19
They don't want to ruin the joke either, which is why they don't have light-hearted laugh about it on their site.

My above comments apply to everyone's beliefs except for TimeCube.

--------------------
Thuryl: I mean, most of us don't go around consuming our own bodily fluids, no matter how delicious they are.
====
Alorael: War and violence would end if we all had each other's babies!
====
Drakefyre: Those are hideous mangos.
Posts: 1415 | Registered: Thursday, March 27 2003 08:00
Agent
Member # 1934
Profile Homepage #20
Ugh. I just read 15 on the philosophy behind the Ontologicial argument. No more God discussions please. My head hurts enough.

--------------------
You acquire an item: Radio Free Foil
Posts: 1169 | Registered: Monday, September 23 2002 07:00
Shaper
Member # 5450
Profile Homepage #21
quote:
Originally written by Drow:

Edit: Speaking of religion, did you know that the Vatican State has its own top level domain, .va? I didn't. (They also have a badly coded - though admittedly nicely designed - online presence, so that point is for Google. :P )
Chuck us a link this way, please.

--------------------
I'll put a Spring in your step.
:ph34r:
Posts: 2396 | Registered: Saturday, January 29 2005 08:00
Law Bringer
Member # 2984
Profile Homepage #22
http://www.vatican.va . Who'd have thought it? :P

--------------------
Encyclopaedia ErmarianaForum ArchivesForum StatisticsRSS [Topic / Forum]
My BlogPolarisI eat novels for breakfast.
Polaris is dead, long live Polaris.
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair.
Posts: 8752 | Registered: Wednesday, May 14 2003 07:00
Agent
Member # 1934
Profile Homepage #23
That's a neat site. It's not all boring and dreary like I thought it would be.

--------------------
You acquire an item: Radio Free Foil
Posts: 1169 | Registered: Monday, September 23 2002 07:00
Law Bringer
Member # 335
Profile Homepage #24
I dislike the site design, though. I wonder if there's a shortage of devout web designers?

—Alorael, who thinks Google's divinity has already been established. Thou art God!
Posts: 14579 | Registered: Saturday, December 1 2001 08:00

Pages