Alorael have finally get a Custom Title?
Pages
Author | Topic: Alorael have finally get a Custom Title? |
---|---|
Master
Member # 5977
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 02:48
Profile
Homepage
quote:[/b][/quote]Oh. I didn't realise it was to code messages. Then it makes sense, I suppose. Though I hate the "Wikipedia/Google is your friend" sentence. -------------------- Play and rate my scenarios: Where the rivers meet View my upcoming scenario: The Nephil Search: Escape. Give us your drek! Posts: 3029 | Registered: Saturday, June 18 2005 07:00 |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 03:16
Profile
Homepage
quote:Good, now you understand how people feel when you use the time of everyone reading a thread to ask a question that you could have answered yourself with a ten second web search. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Master
Member # 5977
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 04:48
Profile
Homepage
quote:As my teacher Dutch would have undoubtly said: Speak for yourself. -------------------- Play and rate my scenarios: Where the rivers meet View my upcoming scenario: The Nephil Search: Escape. Give us your drek! Posts: 3029 | Registered: Saturday, June 18 2005 07:00 |
Agent
Member # 4506
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 04:51
Profile
Homepage
He is. He's just speaking for others as well. ;) - Archmagus Micael -------------------- "You dare Trifle with Avernum?" ~ Erika the Archmage -------------------- My Scenarios: Undead Valley : A small Undead problem, what could possibly go wrong? -------------------- Richard Black - PROOF of his existance (the Infernal one's website). -------------------- MY FORUM! Randomosity at it's highest! :) Posts: 1370 | Registered: Thursday, June 10 2004 07:00 |
Shaper
Member # 5437
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 09:18
Profile
I never see Slarty asking inane questions. Posts: 2032 | Registered: Wednesday, January 26 2005 08:00 |
Law Bringer
Member # 335
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 09:31
Profile
Homepage
Leet isn't intended to be a cipher, really. It's intended to be a way for those who are in the know, meaning those who can write and understand leet, to demonstrate their superiority over the ignorant masses. —Alorael, who would actually be impressed by a community that developed a cipher to render itself opaque to outsiders. Not highly or favorably impressed, but impressed nonetheless. Posts: 14579 | Registered: Saturday, December 1 2001 08:00 |
Law Bringer
Member # 2984
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 22:26
Profile
Homepage
Leet is still an effective way of avoiding auto-censors and ban filters, apparently, and I heard it was developed in part for that purpose. -------------------- Encyclopaedia Ermariana • Forum Archives • Forum Statistics • RSS [Topic / Forum] My Blog • Polaris • I eat novels for breakfast. Polaris is dead, long live Polaris. Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair. Posts: 8752 | Registered: Wednesday, May 14 2003 07:00 |
Warrior
Member # 7002
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 22:34
Profile
Leet is for idiots who can't figure out how to put letters together to form coherent sentences. -------------------- Polaris Posts: 193 | Registered: Thursday, April 6 2006 07:00 |
Shaper
Member # 5450
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 22:40
Profile
Homepage
I don't think idiots would like to make things harder for themselves just because they can't write properly. -------------------- I'll put a Spring in your step. :ph34r: Posts: 2396 | Registered: Saturday, January 29 2005 08:00 |
Warrior
Member # 7002
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 22:45
Profile
As soon as a born idiot touchs a keyboard, he instinctively knows how to type Leet like everyone else knows how to type real words. I hate people who use Leet and/or phrases like "LOL". [ Sunday, May 14, 2006 22:47: Message edited by: Mr.Bookworm ] -------------------- Polaris Posts: 193 | Registered: Thursday, April 6 2006 07:00 |
Shaper
Member # 5450
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 22:56
Profile
Homepage
quote:Look at it from this perspective: Online conversations move fast. Typing "lol" instead of "laughing out loud" is merely a more efficient way of getting ones point across that what another person said caused them some form of amusement. Things like "lmao", "rotfl", and "pmsl" are more enthusiastic ways still. And who cares if it is annoying? You don't have to type "lol"; it is not harming you, so why not leave it be? -------------------- I'll put a Spring in your step. :ph34r: Posts: 2396 | Registered: Saturday, January 29 2005 08:00 |
Law Bringer
Member # 2984
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 23:37
Profile
Homepage
I have to read it, though. -- I think I haven't used "lol" non-sarcastically for over a year. :P -------------------- Encyclopaedia Ermariana • Forum Archives • Forum Statistics • RSS [Topic / Forum] My Blog • Polaris • I eat novels for breakfast. Polaris is dead, long live Polaris. Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair. Posts: 8752 | Registered: Wednesday, May 14 2003 07:00 |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 02:18
Profile
Homepage
And there are people who are vehemently opposed to smilies, Aran, and would be offended that they have to read the :P in your post. -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Law Bringer
Member # 335
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 06:21
Profile
Homepage
My only objection to lol is that ha is one letter shorter and therefore both more widely accepted and more concise. —Alorael, who also very rarely laughs out loud at things seen online. Smirk, yes. Occasionally he even chuckles a bit. But real laughing? For the record, he should also mention that he has never rolled on the floor while laughing or seen anyone do so. Posts: 14579 | Registered: Saturday, December 1 2001 08:00 |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 06:28
Profile
Homepage
Can you tell me honestly that you never use words or phrases which might have a shorter or more traditional alternative? And do you never use figures of speech? Pffffft. As Ed might have said if he were more erudite, go palpate on a participle. ;) -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Shaper
Member # 5437
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 07:53
Profile
The only time I use "lol" is in chat rooms, and sometimes "lmao" if something is exceptionally funny. I never liked "rotfl", it has too many letters, but a friend of mine uses it in place of "lol" so I've gotten used to seeing it. In fast paced chats or MMORPGs one tends to get used to using abbreviations. Things like "ffs", "rly", "ppl", and "omg" can be part of my regular conversations depending on where I am. I wouldn't ever use them here, but there are times it would be too hard to keep up with the conversation if I didn't. [ Monday, May 15, 2006 07:53: Message edited by: Miya ] Posts: 2032 | Registered: Wednesday, January 26 2005 08:00 |
Nuke and Pave
Member # 24
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 09:53
Profile
Homepage
Since it's impossible to use tone of voice, or expression of face over Internet, smileys have to be used as a replacement. I see "lol" in that context. Other expressions, such as "rofl", are a result of inflation where "lol" is used so often that some other expression is necessary to indicate actual laughter. It's possible to replace all smileys with stage directions (*chuckles*, *smiles sadly*, *smiles warmly*, etc.), but typing those out would look even more out of place than typing "lol" or " :) ". -------------------- Be careful with a word, as you would with a sword, For it too has the power to kill. However well placed word, unlike a well placed sword, Can also have the power to heal. Posts: 2649 | Registered: Wednesday, October 3 2001 07:00 |
Agent
Member # 618
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 13:51
Profile
Homepage
I think part of becoming an oldbie is that you finally stop asking the question of whether you are one yet. Though having a really low member number goes a long way to getting there. :P Posts: 1487 | Registered: Sunday, February 10 2002 08:00 |
Dollop of Whipped Cream
Member # 391
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 14:23
Profile
Homepage
quote:If member number is all it takes, then does that make me an oldbie :P ?? -------------------- "Tyranicus is about the only one that still posts in the Nethergate Forum." —Randomizer Spiderweb Chat Room Shadow Vale - My site, home of the Spiderweb Chat Database, BoA Scenario Database, & the A1 Quest List, among other things. Posts: 562 | Registered: Friday, December 14 2001 08:00 |
Shaper
Member # 32
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 15:01
Profile
How low can you go... :P -------------------- Lt. Sullust Cogito Ergo Sum Polaris Posts: 2462 | Registered: Wednesday, October 3 2001 07:00 |
Master
Member # 1046
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 16:21
Profile
Homepage
... I got nothing. :( -------------------- Polaris - owns you. Undead Theories - double U slash E Posts: 3323 | Registered: Thursday, April 25 2002 07:00 |
Shaper
Member # 32
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 17:02
Profile
Which points on the flaws in such a system. There are several members between 1 and 1000 who have contributed almost nothing. EDIT: The idea of some sort of formula which waits various measurable quantities of a member to determine their status has popped into my head. Some of these variables are quite clear (Post Count, Member Number, Years in the Community). However, their relation to the whole is something to be determined. I.E. {(Years)^1.5 or (Years)^2} [ Monday, May 15, 2006 17:06: Message edited by: Lt. Sullust ] -------------------- Lt. Sullust Cogito Ergo Sum Polaris Posts: 2462 | Registered: Wednesday, October 3 2001 07:00 |
Guardian
Member # 6670
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 17:14
Profile
Homepage
If you were a member before January 10, 2006, you are an oldbie. If you became a member after January 10, 2006, you are a newbie. For the record, I hate people who use omg/lol/rotfl almost as much as I hate people who compulsively say like/totally/literally to excess. Fortunately, I rarely have to expend my dislike to two separate groups. -------------------- IF I EVER BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD: Prior to kidnapping an older male scientist and forcing him to work for me, I will investigate his offspring and make sure that he has neither a beautiful but naive daughter who is willing to risk anything to get him back, nor an estranged son who works in the same field but had a falling-out with his father many years ago. Posts: 1509 | Registered: Tuesday, January 10 2006 08:00 |
Shaper
Member # 32
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 17:21
Profile
How convenient, but that date will not do at all. Instead, I propose this, Let X be the vector of the following quantities, t = Function of Years in Community u = Function of Post Count v = Function of Member Number w = Function of Scenarios Designed x = 1 if member was a moderator, 0 otherwise y = 1 if member was an admin, 0 otherwise z = 1 if Jeff Vogel, 0 otherwise Set F[X] = at+bu+cv+dw+ex+fy+gz where a,b,c,d,e,f,g are real constants. Now all that is required is for a few members to send me their respective values for these numbers. Preferably in PM's as there is no reason to post so much information. -------------------- Lt. Sullust Cogito Ergo Sum Polaris Posts: 2462 | Registered: Wednesday, October 3 2001 07:00 |
Master
Member # 4614
|
written Monday, May 15 2006 17:39
Profile
Homepage
Well. Obviously, if you have a higher title, you are of higher status. But anyway, maybe we should define a definite line between newbiehood and oldbiehood, as some people are just aching to cross it. :P -------------------- -ben4808 Posts: 3360 | Registered: Friday, June 25 2004 07:00 |