quote:

---

Originally posted by Contains Hydrogenated Coconut Oil:
1. null
2. very low
3. null
4. beats me

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Alorael:
If I see any more AOLspeek in this topic, I may have to edit posts for profanity.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Chibi-Arctic:
Maybe something about it should be written in the CoC?

---

quote:

---

SPIEDRWEB R CODE OF CONDUCT FOR MOD3RA2RS AND M3MBRS
==
MODERA2RS R EXPECTED 2 UPHOLD DA CODE OF CONDUCT AND WARN MEMBRS ABOUT ANY INFRACTION WHICH TH3Y COMIT!1!! WTF LOL ANY MAJOR TRANSGRASION IS 2 B REPORTAD ON DA MODARA2R FORUM SO AL MODERA2RS AND ADMINISTRA2RS CAN D3AL WIT TEH MAMBR(S)

MODERA2RS!1!111!! WTF R NOT EXEMPT FROM DA CODE OF CONDUCT THEMS3LVES!1!!1 WTF LOL A MINOR INFRACTION WIL R3SULT IN A STARN WARNNG1!1! OMG LOL A MAJOR TRANSGR3SION WIL RESULT IN PROBABL3 REVOKNG OF HIS/HER MOD3RA2R STATUS111!11 LOL ANY TWO BRAACHES OF TEH CODE OF CONDUCT WIL C3RTANELY RESULT IN DA REMOVAL OF MOD3RA2R STATUS

MODARA2RS!1!1!11! HAEV CERTANE ABILITEIS WHICH R NOT GRANT3D 2 REGULAR M3MBRS!!!!1!1 LOL ABUSES OF THIS POWAR R CAETGORIEZD ALONG WIT DA LIST ON MAJOR AND MINOR INFRACTIONS1!1! OMG THEIR R CARTANE EXCAPTIONS BUT A MAJOR PART OF BNG A MODERA2R IS USNG DISCRETION AND RESTRANET!11!11 LOL 3XCLAMENG TAHT A MEMBR HAS PROVOKED U IS NOT SUFICEINT AXCUSE FOR INAPROPRIAET BHAVIOUR

MAMBRS1!11111 OMG WTF R ALSO 3XPACTED 2 ADHER3 2 DA COD3 OF CONDUCT!1!1! OMG WTF LOL ANY MINOR INFRACTION WIL RASULT IN A WARNNG WHIEL A MAJOR TRANSGRESION WIL RASULT IN A FINAL WARNNG OR BANNG DAPENDNG ON DA NATUR3 OF DA BR3ACH OF TEH COD3 OF CONDUCT!!!1!!! WTF LOL MANY MANY MINOR INFRACTIONS R ALSO GROUNDS FOR BANNG
==
APROPRIAET!11111 OMG WTF LOL USE OF SPECIAL POWARS GRANTED 2 MOD3RA2RS IS LIMIETD1!!!1! WTF LOL MODERA2RS CAN 3DIT 2PICS 2 R3MOVE SOM3THNG TAHT IS IN VIOLATION OF DA COD3 OF CONDUCT11!1 LOL MODERA2RS CAN D3L3TE A SNGL3 POST IN A 2PIC IF IT VIOLAETS DA COD3 OF CONDUCT!1!!!! OMG WTF LOL IF DA POST IS DEL3TED DA M3MBR MUST B RAPORT3D ON DA MODERA2R FORUM WIT DA INFRACTION DASCRIEBD

MODERA2RS1!1! OMG CAN LOK AND D3LATE 2PICS AS WEL!!11 OMG THAY SHUD ONLY USA SUCH POWARS ON 2PICS TAHT VIOLAET DA CODE OF CONDUCT1!111 OMG LOL IF TH3Y DO P3RFORM SUCH AN ACTION THEY MUST 3ITHAR DESCRIEB TEH 2PICS INFRACTION ON TEH MODARA2R FORUM OR ACTUALY MOVE TEH 2PIC THEIR!!!!!!!! WTF LOL ALSO HAEV DA POW3R TEH MOVA 2PICS 2 OTH3R FORUMS11!!! WTF LOL THIS WIL ONLY B USAD 2 REMOV3 OF-2PIC POSTS OR SHOW OTH3R MODARA2RS ABOUT A 2PIC
==
MEMBRS!1111!1 OMG R SOLELY RASPONSIBL3 FOR AL US3 OF THEYRE ACOUNTS!!1!!!!1 OMG WTF 3VERY OF3NSE COMITAD BY AN ACOUNT WIL B FAC2R3D AS A TRANSGRESION ON DA PART OF DA ACOUNT NO MAT3R WHO DA PERP3TRA2R ACTUALY IS!1!!!1!! OMG 2 PREV3NT UNWANTAD US3 BY OTHARS PLZ USE DA LOGOUT FAATURE AND PROTECT UR DA1!11!1 WTF FOLOWNG LISTS R GUIEDLIENS AND CERTANE BREACH3S OF DA CODA OF CONDUCT R SUBJACT 2 CLOS3R WUT!!!1 OMG WTF LOL CONSTITUTES A MINOR INFRACTION FOR A M3MBR

+ RAPEAETD POSTNG OF OF-2PIC M8RIAL ON NON-MISCELAENOUS FORUMS
+1!1! OMG WTF LOL POSTNG UNAUTHORIEZD COPYRIGHTED M8RIAL
+ USNG VULGARITY IN ANY LANGUAEG (WHETHAR ITS IN TEH OPAN MASKAD OR ABREVIAETD)
+ FAULTY ACUSATION OF A MEMBR OR MOD3RA2R INCLUDNG CALNG FOR DA LAAVNG OR BANNG OF A MAMBR TAHT IS INOCENT OF INFRACTION
+1!1!11 OMG WTF LOL POSTNG TWO (OR MORE) DIFERANT 2PICS ABOUT DA SME THNG
+!11! WTF DOUBL3 POSTNG
+ ADVARTISNG OR ANY FORM OF COMARCIAL SOLICITATION!!11!
+ REQUASTNG INFORMATION ABOUT WUT1!!!!1 OMG WTF LOL CONSTITUT3S A MINOR INFRACTION FOR A MOD3RA2R

+ POSTNG OF OF-2PIC M8RIAL ON NON-MISCELAENOUS FORUMS
+ POSTNG UNAUTHORIEZD COPYRIGHTAD M8RIAL
+ USNG VULGARITY IN ANY LANGUAEG (WHATH3R ITS IN TEH OPAN MASK3D OR ABR3VIAETD)
+ POSTNG TWO (OR MORA) DIFER3NT 2PICS ABOUT TEH SM3 THNG
+!!1!1 OMG LOL DOUBL3 POSTNG
+ ADVARTISNG OR ANY FORM OF COMERCIAL SOLICITATION!1!1!1! OMG LOL
+ ABUSA OF DA POST-EDITNG POW3R
+ FAULTY ACUSATION OF A WUT CONSTITUTAS A MAJOR TRANSGR3SION FOR A M3MBR

+ ANY COMUNICATION TAHT IS INTEND3D 2 HARAS BLITLA HUMILIAET THR3AETN OR CAUSE EMBARASM3NT 2 A FELOW M3MBR
+!!!!!! OMG LOL HAET SPECH AGANEST A CERTANE GROUP OF PAOPL3 DU3 2 THEYRE RELIGION S3X SAXUAL OREINTATION NATIONALITY 3TC1!!11!
+ IMP3RSONATION OF ANOTHER P3RSON OR SCREN NM3 (INCLUDNG FAKNG A SCREN NM3 BY USNG SIMILAR-LOKNG TEXT CHARACTERS)!1!1! OMG WTF LOL
+ DISCUSION OF IL3GAL ACTIVITEIS11!1!!! WTF
+ DEPICTIONS OF S3XUALY EXPLICIT M8RIAL1!1!!11!
+ FLODNG TEH FORUMS WIT LOTS OF 2PICS AND POSTS ABOUT NOTHNG LAGITIMAET
+1111!1!! WTF LOL R3QU3STS FOR CRAKS PIRAETD SOFTWAER WAYS 2 PIRAET SOFTWAER WUT!111 WTF LOL CONSTITUT3S A MAJOR TRANSGR3SION FOR A MODERA2R

+ ANY COMUNICATION TAHT IS INT3NDED 2 HARAS BLITL3 HUMILIAET THR3AETN OR CAUS3 EMBARASMANT 2 A F3LOW MAMBR
+!!11! OMG WTF HAET SPECH AGANEST A CERTANE GROUP OF P3OPLA DUE 2 THEYRE RELIGION SEX SAXUAL OREINTATION NATIONALITY 3TC!!!111 OMG LOL
+ IMPARSONATION OF ANOTH3R PARSON OR SCREN NME (INCLUDNG FAKNG A SCREN NM3 BY USNG SIMILAR-LOKNG T3XT CHARACTERS)1111!!! WTF
+ DISCUSION OF IL3GAL ACTIVITEIS1111 OMG WTF LOL
+ DAPICTIONS OF S3XUALY EXPLICIT M8RIAL11!!111! WTF LOL
+ FLODNG TEH FORUMS WIT LOTS OF 2PICS AND POSTS ABOUT NOTHNG LEGITIMAET
+!!11 OMG WTF LOL ABUSA OF LOK DELETE AND MOV3 POWERS
+!!!!!!1 FAULTY ACUSATION OF A MEMBR OR MODARA2R INCLUDNG CALNG FOR TEH LAAVNG OR BANNG OF A M3MBR TAHT IS INOCANT OF INFRACTION
+1!!1! OMG WTF LOL ANY DISCUSION OF HEX-3DITNG OR REQUESTS FOR CRAKS PIRAETD SOFTWAER WAYS 2 PIRAET SOFTWAER ETC
==
IF11!!!! OMG WTF A MEMBR OR MOD3RA2R HAS A COMPLANET ABOUT A MOD3RA2R TH3Y SHUD 3MALE THEYRE COMPLANET 2 DRAEKY@SIETMOUS3COM!!1! LOL OR LSTROUT@SPIEDRWEBSOFTWAERCOM
11!! OMG WTF LOL

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by el presidente:
Learn to read, dickweed.

---

quote:

---

Please learn to read these things more carefully;

---

quote:

---

Please read these things before responding to them.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by el presidente:
I don't believe it's accepted practice to destroy hijacked planes. Hijackers, more often than not, have a goal in hijacking a plane besides destroying buildings, and sending jets to scare the bejesus out of the highjackers gives them the wrong idea and jeopardizes any people in the aircraft.

I see you've dished out the rhetoric right from the get-go. You've changed "the accepted practice of interceptor jets" to "the accepted practice of blowing up planes". Then you go on to describe why blowing up planes is a bad thing. And then you automatically equate the "better choice" to military policy. All I have to say is...huh?


"Prolonged, horrifying attack"? You make it sound as if we saw this coming. The attacks were bolts of the blue, and the US would consume massive amounts of time and resources vigorously pursuing every potential threat. As it is in this kind of affair, by the time you know for sure what's going on, several weeks have passed since the attack.

(I didn't phrase the questions. A well-respected Canadian journalist did.)

So...you think it would be a waste for the US would consume "vast amounts of time and resources" in order to stop further terrorist attacks? You don't consider two wars to be "vast amounts of time and resources"?

Suspicions were raised on them -- but not credible suspicions, not ones which would lead an immediate investigation or apprehension. In the US, it is not possible to arrest a man because you have a hunch about him being willing to commit a crime, nor should it ever be so.

It's not possible to arrest a man for a potential crime? What about all those people sitting in jail with no evidence and no trials forthcoming? What about the USA's policy on dealing pre-emptively with Saddam? Do you agree with these now, Alec? The US does what it likes.

Because Donald Rumsfeld is an irrational warmonger. You knew this, right?

It's so easy and fun to say "the Bush administration is filled with idiots". Sort of like how Disney poked fun at Hitler during the war, by making him out to be incompetent. (Except that...gasp! He wasn't!) But they all got their jobs because they're at least of average intelligence.

Why were the planes at Pearl Harbor mostly destroyed on their carriers? After all, there were obvious warnings about the attacks on Pearl Harbor.
The answer to both is that there was no state of alarm at the time of the attacks. Asking the US to be on constant alert against any remotely credible threat would be insane.

Again, you've transformed "protecting the leader of the country" to "being on constant alert against any remotely credible threat". Not the same, Alec. It's not hard to protect a single, vital target. Once again, drop the rhetoric.

So far as I'm aware, the final sentence of this paragraph makes false assumptions -- Bush couldn't have been briefed about the attacks before they happened, could they? He was there for PR, plain and simple.

It was after the attacks, before the PR event.

1½ good questions out of 7.

Wow. A "good question", and you decided not to answer it.

It's idiotic questions like most of these that prevent more valid, sane ones from being answered, too. Conspiracy-theory nonsense allows the powers that be to propaganda away genuine concerns about the events following the 9/11 attacks as "insane conspiracy theories".

6 000 000 people died in the world's largest conspiracy. Killing 2000 is a hell of a lot easier. Especially when they're helpless sheep who consider asking questions to be "idiotic".

I'm not saying it's probable that the USA launched an attack on itself. Just possible.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by [Sarachim]:
Alec, Gundam Wing being equal to 0 doesn't invalidate his proof. In fact, it shortens it.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Lt. Sullust:
Evil is the root of Saunders?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Chibi-Arctic:
I will give you a good start. I as in yourself is written with a capital i.

Example 1. - I have a big pile of poo in my pants. Sentences start with capital letters.

Example 2. You know, I have a big pile of poo in my pants. Again, capital letter at the start, but I is also capital. YAY for that. Have a nice day.

---