A Statistically Happy New Year!

Error message

Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /var/www/pied-piper.ermarian.net/includes/common.inc).


AuthorTopic: A Statistically Happy New Year!
Member # 6670
Profile Homepage #150

Posts: 1509 | Registered: Tuesday, January 10 2006 08:00
Member # 6700
Profile Homepage #151
Originally written by Bismark*:


Argg!!! I cannot superscript here.

Typically, you'd do something like "(meta)^4".

This of couse begs the question, what is the product of (meta)x(meta)?
Or, even more significantly, what is the product of (spam)x(spam)?

The Silent Assassin has agreed to your price of four cantaloupes, two pallettes of flesh-tone stage makeup, and a bottle of compressed nitrous oxide.
Expect the whoopee cushions to be in place within the week.

-Lenar Labs
What's Your Destiny?

Ushmushmeifa: Lenar's power is almighty and ineffable.

All hail lord Noric, god of... well, something important, I'm sure.
Posts: 735 | Registered: Monday, January 16 2006 08:00
Law Bringer
Member # 4153
Profile Homepage #152
Originally written by Tyranicus.:

Avernum Risk. Empire vs. Avernum vs. Vahnatai
This would be awesome. Include slith, nephilim, and bandits for the normal 6 players... or maybe I'm just thinking about this too much. We've been playing this a lot in my suite lately.

Gamble with Gaea, and she eats your dice.

I hate undead. I really, really, really, really hate undead. With a passion.
Posts: 4130 | Registered: Friday, March 26 2004 08:00
Member # 1934
Profile Homepage #153
Originally written by Lenar Labs:

Or, even more significantly, what is the product of (spam)x(spam)?

I don't know about that, but this is what (spam)*(spam)*(spam) looks like:


[ Sunday, January 28, 2007 17:29: Message edited by: Andraste ]

You acquire an item: Radio Free Foil
Posts: 1169 | Registered: Monday, September 23 2002 07:00
Member # 7331
Profile Homepage #154
Aahhh! That poor computer!

You Shall Die Laughing: http://www.worfthecat.ermarian.net/converted

The Roost: www.roost01.proboards104.com. Birds of a feather flock together.
Posts: 794 | Registered: Thursday, July 27 2006 07:00
Law Bringer
Member # 6785
Profile #155
Not being able to see rankings while the Endeavor bot was resting didn't do much to reduce spam. It would take direct action from the mods and admins to reduce it.
Posts: 4643 | Registered: Friday, February 10 2006 08:00
Member # 7420
Profile Homepage #156
You know, the recent high spam counts could be almost completely eliminated with the locking of this single thread itself. Faith in the system is, once again, misplaced. Viva spam.

You lose.
Posts: 2156 | Registered: Thursday, August 24 2006 07:00
Law Bringer
Member # 335
Profile Homepage #157
Actually, removing individuals from the rankings temporarily would be interesting. Maybe the top ten, or the top five, of each month, should only reappear on the spam rankings after two more months have elapsed. It would at least be chaotic.

—Alorael, who is pretty sure that most (meta)x(meta) is 0. Metas are usually parallel, as they are in this case. (meta)•(meta) is probably the more useful product, and it's simply meta^2.
Posts: 14579 | Registered: Saturday, December 1 2001 08:00
Law Bringer
Member # 2984
Profile Homepage #158
Interesting concept, Alo - after all, I do have the technology for delisting members in place. I'd just need to add some kind of forced privacy setting that couldn't be changed...

Oh, and I agree that this thread has taken a direction I don't like. Fortunately, unlike others who have their threads hijacked in the name of spam, I can do something about it. *waves staff*


[ Sunday, January 28, 2007 22:35: Message edited by: Arancaytar ]

Encyclopaedia ErmarianaForum ArchivesForum StatisticsRSS [Topic / Forum]
My BlogPolarisI eat novels for breakfast.
Polaris is dead, long live Polaris.
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair.
Posts: 8752 | Registered: Wednesday, May 14 2003 07:00