New Abortion Laws
Pages
Author | Topic: New Abortion Laws |
---|---|
Off With Their Heads
Member # 4045
|
written Sunday, April 10 2005 10:57
Profile
Homepage
You are wrong. They have DNA or RNA. (source) -------------------- Arancaytar: Every time you ask people to compare TM and Kel, you endanger the poor, fluffy kittens. Kelandon's Pink and Pretty Page!!: the authorized location for all things by me The Archive of all released BoE scenarios ever Posts: 7968 | Registered: Saturday, February 28 2004 08:00 |
Warrior
Member # 4131
|
written Sunday, April 10 2005 11:36
Profile
I won't waste time reading all the other posts so I'll get straight to the point. A woman who aborts at ANY stage should be shot!Even when the baby is just a clump of cells IT'S STILL A LIVING THING!and has the same rights as a normal human.If not more so! :mad: :mad: :mad: If they feel it will be unfair on them then... THATS LIFE!IT AIN'T FAIR!!!! If everyone did it their would be a LOT less humans...hmm or maybe that would make the planet more peaceful :rolleyes: A place with no humans would be one very peaceful place :rolleyes: :rolleyes: -That is the opinion of Stormlord Windspire Drayk lord and Guard of the Geneforge!!! [ Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:37: Message edited by: Stormlord Windspire ] -------------------- I like Biscuits!!!! Posts: 67 | Registered: Sunday, March 21 2004 08:00 |
Infiltrator
Member # 4637
|
written Sunday, April 10 2005 12:25
Profile
Homepage
quote:You are biologically a human and you are humanly alive. The fetus/embryo is biologically a human and humanly alive, since it's human to be a zygote before an embryo, an embryo before a fetus, a fetus before a child, a child before an adult. Spy.there: quote:Who says animals don't have conscience? Their conscience is limited and diferent from a human's conscience, but they have. So that's not what separate's a human from an animal, so can't separate an embryo from an human too. So the bottom line is: the embryo is a human being, no matter how conscious or how developed. Or should we kill people with the syndrome of Down? If you want to put in question why should we protect a human life, then you should ask why are murder, rape, theft, etc illegal. dolphin: quote:Those two sentences are contraditory. quote:This doesn't contribute to your point of view either. quote:What a selfish and cruel statement to make. It's better to kill the baby, than supporting certain ordeals. What you're saying is that assassination is ok, because the child's would bother you. You also say it's ok because in your opinion, the embryo/fetus is just "somewhat" a human being. Fortunately wise people don't agree with you, and condemn assassination. Fortunately our ethics and laws aren't based in misinformed personal opinions, like your's. -------------------- Visit the Blades of Avernum Center and the Beta Testing Center -------------- "Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ." Colossians 2:6-9 Posts: 483 | Registered: Tuesday, June 29 2004 07:00 |
Shaper
Member # 5437
|
written Sunday, April 10 2005 12:38
Profile
quote:How can you justify taking one life for another? To say a woman should be shot for having an abortion makes you no better than those you have so much anger towards. Also please elaborate on why you think a clump of cells should have more rights than a fully developed human. quote:Quite a contradiction. First you feel that people should add more people to the world, and they should be killed if they choose not to allow those new people to be born. Than you say the world would be better with less or no humans. [ Sunday, April 10, 2005 12:40: Message edited by: Dolphin ] -------------------- Nena Posts: 2032 | Registered: Wednesday, January 26 2005 08:00 |
Shake Before Using
Member # 75
|
written Sunday, April 10 2005 12:46
Profile
quote:Your IQ is two standard deviations below the mean. --- Overwhelming, Kelandon, Dolphin, and all others concerned, I'm locking this thread now. It's gotten completely bogged down in definitions and useless sidetracks. Posts: 3234 | Registered: Thursday, October 4 2001 07:00 |