Content ratings
Author | Topic: Content ratings |
---|---|
Apprentice
Member # 7079
|
written Monday, May 8 2006 13:31
Profile
Homepage
I am creating some BoE scenarios. Although I am only beginning to create my scenarios, I would like to know what I should set the content rating to. Could someone please tell me how to work out a scenario's content rating. :confused: A content rating is like G, PG, M, MA and R in Australia. In Spiderweb Software it is G, PG and R. WARNING: IRRELLAVENT NOTE! In Australia, G means general public (everyone) PG means parental guidance recommended for people under 15, M means reccomended for mature audiences (Reccomended for people 15 & over) MA means mature accompanied (This is restricted and means that if you are under 15 you must be accompanied by an adult to see it) R means Restricted and you MUST be 18 (the age of consent in Australia) or over [ Monday, May 08, 2006 13:51: Message edited by: Aussieavernum ] Posts: 42 | Registered: Friday, April 28 2006 07:00 |
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
|
written Monday, May 8 2006 14:00
Profile
Homepage
G=G PG=PG R=M -------------------- SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice. Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00 |
Infiltrator
Member # 6652
|
written Monday, May 8 2006 14:09
Profile
G, PG, and R are the American content ratings. (There's also PG-13, but Jeff left it out of BOE). G means General Audiences (Completely clean, everyone admitted) PG means Parental Guidance (Almost harmless, maybe a couple of fart jokes or something) and R is Restricted (Adult material, no one under 17 admitted without accompanying parent or guardian). See MPAA Note that this is pretty outdated; PG is basically the new G, and 8-year olds are allowed to see PG-13 movies with no protest. In general, your basic BOE scenario is PG. If there's no combat at all and a happy-fun-bunnies plot, it's probably G. If you've got several gruesome murders, it's probably R. However, scenario designers tend to overrestimate gore; Spears or Falling Stars are PG in my opinion, but they're rated R. EDIT: Ash Lael has beaten me. Well, I have more words. Ha! [ Monday, May 08, 2006 14:09: Message edited by: Little Billy Sue ] -------------------- But I don't want to ride the elevator. Posts: 420 | Registered: Sunday, January 8 2006 08:00 |
...b10010b...
Member # 869
|
written Tuesday, May 9 2006 01:01
Profile
Homepage
quote:I beg to differ. Falling Stars definitely earns its R rating. Most of it isn't too objectionable, sure, but one or two parts don't belong in a PG scenario. (Of course, with Falling Stars being what it is, many players will miss those parts, but they're still there.) -------------------- The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure! Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00 |
Shock Trooper
Member # 6821
|
written Tuesday, May 9 2006 07:37
Profile
There are some ratings out there I have trouble understanding, though. I mean, why would tehGRICH2 be rated NC-17? Is it a joke? Or did I miss something? Posts: 363 | Registered: Wednesday, February 22 2006 08:00 |
Lifecrafter
Member # 1768
|
written Tuesday, May 9 2006 12:13
Profile
I wouldn't worry about tehGRICH or tehGRICH2 if I were you… -------------------- "Oh, North Wind, why frighten others? In Nature's family all are brothers. Puff and blow and wheeze and hiss; You can't frighten Shingebiss. Bring your frost and ice and snow; I'm still free to come and go. You can never frighten me, One who never fears is FREE!" -Shingebiss, the mighty duck Posts: 830 | Registered: Tuesday, August 20 2002 07:00 |
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
|
written Tuesday, May 9 2006 16:28
Profile
Homepage
TG2 is a joke. -------------------- SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice. Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00 |
BANNED
Member # 4
|
written Wednesday, May 10 2006 15:18
Profile
Homepage
-------------------- * Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00 |
Apprentice
Member # 7079
|
written Thursday, May 11 2006 00:11
Profile
Homepage
quote:That is not what I am talking about. :( quote:That what I am talking about :) but VoDT (Valley of Dying Things is not a "happy-fun-bunnies" plot but it is G. But you are probably right about R. And I don't play Falling Stars or Spears and I won't for a while because I don't want my Mother looking at my computer just because I am playing one of those scenarios. Posts: 42 | Registered: Friday, April 28 2006 07:00 |
Off With Their Heads
Member # 4045
|
written Thursday, May 11 2006 07:17
Profile
Homepage
Um, those two halves of the post are very closely related. The point is that the BoE ratings are supposed to work like movie ratings. I'm fairly certain that people basically note "R" or "not R." If your scenario has blood and guts (so to speak), it's R. Otherwise, it's not R. -------------------- Arancaytar: Every time you ask people to compare TM and Kel, you endanger the poor, fluffy kittens. Smoo: Get ready to face the walls! Ephesos: In conclusion, yarr. Kelandon's Pink and Pretty Page!!: the authorized location for all things by me The Archive of all released BoE scenarios ever Posts: 7968 | Registered: Saturday, February 28 2004 08:00 |
...b10010b...
Member # 869
|
written Thursday, May 11 2006 13:28
Profile
Homepage
Given that there's a general perception that there's been some degree of rating inflation in recent scenarios, it may also be worthwhile to put a little note in your readme explaining why you're giving your scenario an R rating. -------------------- The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure! Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00 |
Apprentice
Member # 7079
|
written Thursday, May 11 2006 19:28
Profile
Homepage
I didn't say that I was going to make my scenario R. I said that I thought that Little Billy Sue was right about R and gruesome murders. I want to play my own scenario without my mother looking at my computer all the time. Posts: 42 | Registered: Friday, April 28 2006 07:00 |
The Establishment
Member # 6
|
written Friday, May 12 2006 19:44
Profile
My take on the R is the level of detail. If there's normal kill the bandits stuff, no harm done. However, if you go into exacting details about how the victim was dismembered, you may want to consider an R rating. -------------------- Your flower power is no match for my glower power! Posts: 3726 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00 |
Master
Member # 4614
|
written Saturday, May 13 2006 12:06
Profile
Homepage
However, I think some scenarios are just rated R so the player can't say it "shouldn't have been PG", though it's not really R. Analogous to setting beginning scenarios on Very High party level to prevent enemy HP doubling. -------------------- -ben4808 Posts: 3360 | Registered: Friday, June 25 2004 07:00 |
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
|
written Saturday, May 13 2006 16:49
Profile
Homepage
Pretty much. Maybe half of R scenarios deserve that rating. And then there are the occasional PG scenarios that deserve an R rating, but there's not many of those. -------------------- SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice. Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00 |
BANNED
Member # 4
|
written Sunday, May 14 2006 20:53
Profile
Homepage
quote:Hi!!!! -------------------- * Posts: 6936 | Registered: Tuesday, September 18 2001 07:00 |