Ancient Mystery: Solved!
Pages
- 1
- 2
Author | Topic: Ancient Mystery: Solved! |
---|---|
Lifecrafter
Member # 34
|
written Saturday, May 27 2006 21:05
Profile
Homepage
CNN reported this the other day: quote:So, now that this entire branch of philosophy has been cleared up, any reactions? -------------------- Frisbeetarianism is the belief that when you die, your soul goes up on the roof and gets stuck. 'Spiderweb Software' anagrammmed: 'Word-bereft A**wipe' Posts: 702 | Registered: Wednesday, October 3 2001 07:00 |
? Man, ? Amazing
Member # 5755
|
written Saturday, May 27 2006 21:07
Profile
There is still the matter of the road. Nothing has been resolved. -------------------- quote: Posts: 4114 | Registered: Monday, April 25 2005 07:00 |
Warrior
Member # 7002
|
written Saturday, May 27 2006 21:12
Profile
Who cares? I'd rather know something useful, like how my computer works. -------------------- Polaris Posts: 193 | Registered: Thursday, April 6 2006 07:00 |
? Man, ? Amazing
Member # 5755
|
written Saturday, May 27 2006 21:26
Profile
Call the Vatican. (That it works at all is a miracle.) -------------------- quote: Posts: 4114 | Registered: Monday, April 25 2005 07:00 |
Infiltrator
Member # 1092
|
written Saturday, May 27 2006 21:51
Profile
Homepage
Who laid the egg in the first place? A turkey maybe? -------------------- When you think you can't get any lower in life and hit rock bottom, God hands you a shovel. Why should I say somthin intelligent when idiots like you make me look intelligent in the first place. Posts: 615 | Registered: Friday, May 3 2002 07:00 |
Shock Trooper
Member # 6908
|
written Saturday, May 27 2006 22:17
Profile
Everytime I start to think on this question, I come to a conclusion that the process musthave been more complicated than spontaneous birth of a chicken from an egg layed by non-chicken. Also here this question may bring the discussion on genetics again, doubling "The Big Club Theory" :) -------------------- 9 masks sing in a choir: Gnome Dwarf Slith Giant Troll Troglo Human Nephil Vahnatai "If the mask under mask to SE of mask to the left of mask and to the right of me is the mask below the mask to the right of mask to the right of mask below me is the same, then who am I?" radix: +2 nicothodes: +1 salmon:+1 Posts: 203 | Registered: Tuesday, March 14 2006 08:00 |
Law Bringer
Member # 335
|
written Saturday, May 27 2006 22:25
Profile
Homepage
Why is anything from which a chicken hatches a chicken egg? If a chicken hatched from a very large frog's egg would it still be a chicken egg? —Alorael, who would prefer to say that eggs predated birds in general in evolution. All birds lay eggs and the chicken evolved from some egg-laying forebear. Therefore the first chicken hatched from an egg regardless of the egg's classification. An egg came first. Posts: 14579 | Registered: Saturday, December 1 2001 08:00 |
Law Bringer
Member # 2984
|
written Saturday, May 27 2006 22:29
Profile
Homepage
Rather than "one" egg that was laid by non-chicken parents and hatched as a chicken, there were probably several hundred generations of these, each one looking a bit closer to a chicken. The scope and speed of evolution tends to get exaggerated, which is one reason fundamentalists find it so hard to believe. [ Saturday, May 27, 2006 22:29: Message edited by: Henry Anthony Wilcox ] -------------------- Encyclopaedia Ermariana • Forum Archives • Forum Statistics • RSS [Topic / Forum] My Blog • Polaris • I eat novels for breakfast. Polaris is dead, long live Polaris. Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair. Posts: 8752 | Registered: Wednesday, May 14 2003 07:00 |
Infiltrator
Member # 2836
|
written Saturday, May 27 2006 23:08
Profile
I knew it. I always said the egg. Posts: 587 | Registered: Tuesday, April 1 2003 08:00 |
Electric Sheep One
Member # 3431
|
written Saturday, May 27 2006 23:57
Profile
Speciation is probably a fuzzy logic sort of thing. It's supposed to be about the possibility of interbreeding, isn't it? But that probably doesn't happen overnight. The rate of spontaneous abortion resulting from breeding between two populations would just gradually increase, until eventually there were never any offspring; then, much later, with the two gene pools now totally separate, the two species might begin to diverge dramatically in visible ways. So the line between chicken and proto-chicken would be a fuzzy one. Could we interpret the fuzziness as a sharp line that gets drawn randomly, and say that wherever it got drawn it would always be between proto-hen and chicken egg? I'm not so sure, because I'm not so sure that genetics doesn't change after conception. What if a living proto-chicken has a mutation in its reproductive organs, whether from natural radiation damage to its DNA, or from a virus, or from replication error during cell division? -------------------- We're not doing cool. We're doing pretty. Posts: 3335 | Registered: Thursday, September 4 2003 07:00 |
...b10010b...
Member # 869
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 00:40
Profile
Homepage
quote:That's a definition of species you hear a lot, but there are plenty of evolutionary biologists who don't really take it all that seriously any more. For one thing, many species don't reproduce sexually at all, so the concept of "interbreeding" simply doesn't apply to them. For another, some populations which are widely recognised as separate species can produce fertile hybrids. In some cases these hybrids break down after a few generations, but in others the hybrids remain viable and fertile indefinitely. And then there are "ring species", which are populations spread out across a continuous geographic region; individuals near each other can interbreed easily, while individuals at opposite ends of the region can't interbreed. quote:"Arbitrarily" is a better word than "randomly". Decide exactly how you're going to define a chicken and a chicken egg, and then you'll be able to sensibly answer the question of which came first -- but your answer will simply arise from the definitions you chose. [ Sunday, May 28, 2006 00:42: Message edited by: Thuryl ] -------------------- The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure! Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00 |
Electric Sheep One
Member # 3431
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 01:05
Profile
Thanks; these examples all ring bells now that I read them again, but it has been a while since I was all keen on evolutionary biology, and the stuff has reached its half-life. In speaking of fuzzy concepts and random lines, I was alluding to fuzzy set theory. The plausibility weight used for fuzzy sets behaves just like probability, so you can always interpret a fuzzy definition as a biased random generator of arbitrary definitions, and this is often a good way of expressing subtle issues. But identifying plausibility and probability is controversial. I have a feeling that if I understood that controversy better I might understand quantum mechanics better, too. -------------------- We're not doing cool. We're doing pretty. Posts: 3335 | Registered: Thursday, September 4 2003 07:00 |
Infiltrator
Member # 6652
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 01:12
Profile
Only on Spiderweb will a discussion about the chicken and the egg turn into a discussion about evolutionary biology. -------------------- But I don't want to ride the elevator. Posts: 420 | Registered: Sunday, January 8 2006 08:00 |
Shaper
Member # 5450
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 01:19
Profile
Homepage
That article is full of bad puns. Thuryl, did you write that? -------------------- I'll put a Spring in your step. :ph34r: Posts: 2396 | Registered: Saturday, January 29 2005 08:00 |
Shock Trooper
Member # 6908
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 01:34
Profile
quote:The Big Club theory showed a better example :) -------------------- 9 masks sing in a choir: Gnome Dwarf Slith Giant Troll Troglo Human Nephil Vahnatai "If the mask under mask to SE of mask to the left of mask and to the right of me is the mask below the mask to the right of mask to the right of mask below me is the same, then who am I?" radix: +2 nicothodes: +1 salmon:+1 Posts: 203 | Registered: Tuesday, March 14 2006 08:00 |
E Equals MC What!!!!
Member # 5491
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 04:17
Profile
Homepage
quote:While I realize you meant no offense by this, I'd caution against presuming too much about other people's beliefs. -------------------- SupaNik: Aran, you're not big enough to threaten Ash. Dammit, even JV had to think twice. Posts: 1861 | Registered: Friday, February 11 2005 08:00 |
Off With Their Heads
Member # 4045
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 08:13
Profile
Homepage
He did say one reason, not the only reason. That's not presuming too much, I suspect. -------------------- Arancaytar: Every time you ask people to compare TM and Kel, you endanger the poor, fluffy kittens. Smoo: Get ready to face the walls! Ephesos: In conclusion, yarr. Kelandon's Pink and Pretty Page!!: the authorized location for all things by me The Archive of all released BoE scenarios ever Posts: 7968 | Registered: Saturday, February 28 2004 08:00 |
Lifecrafter
Member # 6403
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 08:16
Profile
But many fundies have no problem with that reason. There is assumption in that statement. -------------------- ??? ?????? ???? ????? Posts: 883 | Registered: Wednesday, October 19 2005 07:00 |
Off With Their Heads
Member # 4045
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 08:41
Profile
Homepage
He didn't say "all fundamentalists." He simply used a plural: more than one fundamentalist. -------------------- Arancaytar: Every time you ask people to compare TM and Kel, you endanger the poor, fluffy kittens. Smoo: Get ready to face the walls! Ephesos: In conclusion, yarr. Kelandon's Pink and Pretty Page!!: the authorized location for all things by me The Archive of all released BoE scenarios ever Posts: 7968 | Registered: Saturday, February 28 2004 08:00 |
? Man, ? Amazing
Member # 5755
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 10:27
Profile
And the conversation moves back to safe grounds... Arguing over word choice and hidden meanings. Wheeeeeeeeee! :P -------------------- quote: Posts: 4114 | Registered: Monday, April 25 2005 07:00 |
Warrior
Member # 7171
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 11:15
Profile
quote:There is no reason to assume the two are meaningfully separate. Posts: 66 | Registered: Sunday, May 28 2006 07:00 |
Law Bringer
Member # 2984
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 11:24
Profile
Homepage
Rephrased: "I have known at least one person who I would class as a fundamentalist who argued against the feasibility of macro-evolution based on at least partly this reason." :rolleyes: [ Sunday, May 28, 2006 11:25: Message edited by: Henry Anthony Wilcox ] -------------------- Encyclopaedia Ermariana • Forum Archives • Forum Statistics • RSS [Topic / Forum] My Blog • Polaris • I eat novels for breakfast. Polaris is dead, long live Polaris. Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair. Posts: 8752 | Registered: Wednesday, May 14 2003 07:00 |
Raven v. Writing Desk
Member # 261
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 11:28
Profile
Homepage
"Which came first: the signifier or the signified?" -------------------- Slarty vs. Desk • Desk vs. Slarty • Timeline of Ermarian • G4 Strategy Central Posts: 3560 | Registered: Wednesday, November 7 2001 08:00 |
Infiltrator
Member # 6652
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 12:30
Profile
Of course... discussions on evolutionary biology eventually turn into spam... -------------------- But I don't want to ride the elevator. Posts: 420 | Registered: Sunday, January 8 2006 08:00 |
? Man, ? Amazing
Member # 5755
|
written Sunday, May 28 2006 12:33
Profile
quote:And now it becomes a Monty Python skit. Well done, Sir. -------------------- quote: Posts: 4114 | Registered: Monday, April 25 2005 07:00 |
Pages
- 1
- 2