Editor, again
Author | Topic: Editor, again |
---|---|
Shock Trooper
Member # 2626
|
written Wednesday, September 7 2005 12:51
Profile
I'm not sure I'm asking in the correct terminolgy, so please bear with me. I think, (am asking), EVERY function is done by a Node, Y/N? "Node" appears to be the name for a "Token", or "Bit" that is checked for status of the required function, Y/N? It's the NODE, itself, which is the SDF because it becomes an SDF when the Author so designates a NODE to do a certain function, Y/N? As such, there isn't a listing of the 10 x 300 SDF's. It's just a maximum amount of designations allowed in this particular Editor, Y/N? So, if I want to have the Party acquire an item, I set a Node to "Get Item". But, I have to use another Node to see if they already "have" that item, Y/N? This, in turn, allows, (or not), the Party to get the item, ( or so it seems). So, the minimum number of Nodes needed to acquire an Item would be two; one to "Get Item" and another to check to see if they already "Have Item", Y/N? If this is right, then it all seems perfectly logical to me. The only problem is the terminology, which is what the original writer of the Program decided upon. And the terminology seems to be what must be learned ONLY by familiarizing one's self by using the Editor. If what I've just said seems a bit excessive, I think it's because I'm beginning to "get it". Now, if I can just apply this to the If/Then thingy-do, I'll be fine. :eek: In advance, thanx, me :D Posts: 257 | Registered: Wednesday, February 12 2003 08:00 |
...b10010b...
Member # 869
|
written Wednesday, September 7 2005 13:31
Profile
Homepage
Nodes and SDFs are completely different. A node is something that performs an action; an SDF just stores information. Some nodes set or check SDFs, but others have nothing to do with SDFs at all. You only need one node to give the party an item, but you'd need another node to set an SDF to store the information that they've been given the item (so that it can't be given twice, for example). [ Wednesday, September 07, 2005 13:33: Message edited by: Laudanum ] -------------------- The Empire Always Loses: This Time For Sure! Posts: 9973 | Registered: Saturday, March 30 2002 08:00 |
Agent
Member # 3364
|
written Wednesday, September 7 2005 19:53
Profile
Homepage
quote: -------------------- "Even the worst Terror from Hell can be transformed to a testimony from Heaven!" - Rev. David Wood 6\23\05 "Do all the good you can, by all the means you can, in all the ways you can, in all the places you can, at all the times you can, to all the people you can, as long as you ever can." - John Wesley Posts: 1001 | Registered: Tuesday, August 19 2003 07:00 |
Shock Trooper
Member # 2626
|
written Thursday, September 8 2005 03:44
Profile
Shucks! Just when I thought I was beginning to get the hang of this thing. It's a heck of a lot easier to understand in the "Basic" format you explained. That, I can "see". It's a shame I can't write it like that. I type pretty well and understood Basic since the kids were on C-64's. This really is a confusing way of doing things. N E how.... Back to the book. Thanks a bunch to both of you. me Posts: 257 | Registered: Wednesday, February 12 2003 08:00 |
Agent
Member # 3364
|
written Thursday, September 8 2005 05:09
Profile
Homepage
When I do my own nodework, I usually do write it that way first. It's much easier to make changes when you can see everything right in front of you. And then when it looks like I have everything in order I open the editor to plug stuff in. -------------------- "Even the worst Terror from Hell can be transformed to a testimony from Heaven!" - Rev. David Wood 6\23\05 "Do all the good you can, by all the means you can, in all the ways you can, in all the places you can, at all the times you can, to all the people you can, as long as you ever can." - John Wesley Posts: 1001 | Registered: Tuesday, August 19 2003 07:00 |
Shock Trooper
Member # 2626
|
written Thursday, September 8 2005 07:03
Profile
Makes a lot of sense. Just from what I've been doing, I've ended up with a lot of scraps of paper, each referencing the other. By writing it in a "Basic" style, it becomes a simple list of each Node "loop". Now, I'll have a much neater, and more easily readable, record of what I've done. Thanks, me :D Posts: 257 | Registered: Wednesday, February 12 2003 08:00 |
Master
Member # 4614
|
written Thursday, September 8 2005 17:29
Profile
Homepage
Eh, I just write the node string, test it, figure out why it didn't work, and fix it. But that makes by node numbers kind of inconsistent and out of order. -------------------- -ben4808 Posts: 3360 | Registered: Friday, June 25 2004 07:00 |